sibeliuss

9 ms·

91.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
You need to give it a map. Write a markdown file explaining what you would like it to do, some relevant examples, what not to do, etc, then ask IT to draw up a plan for you to review. And then ask it to implement the plan.
92.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
This is such a terribly dumb and worn out trope. Good leaders are the key to great teams. Good leaders know how to deal with excessively productive people, and underperforming people, and to harmonize them. A 10x engineer under good managem
93.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Sitting around, watching claude-code 'think', hitting y, hitting enter, adding a little prompt context, giving it hints, etc, day after day, hour after hour. So exciting.
94.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
This was one of the reasons why I applied. I wasn't entirely sure it was the right fit (my current job is flexible, which is good, vs a grind, and I'm happy there) but I wanted to study their ways a bit and see what I could bring
95.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
At my current job, we use some variety of each tool that PostHog has built. We have analytics, feature flags, session replay, surveys, error logging and more. We spend an astronomical amount of money for these services, and where was that l
96.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Have you bothered to spend any time looking at their entirely open source product, docs, handbook, etc? There are many different things going on here. A gross and frankly ignorant simplification, considering what they've built.
97.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Having attended a SuperDay, I can hands down state that their interview process is the best I've ever had (didn't get the job tho, which was probably for the best at this phase of life). Designed to perfectly lift signal and minim
98.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Uh, I think he learned what _universe level scale_ really means.
99.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
I love it too! So much to see / do / improve
100.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Incredibly interesting - thanks for posting.
101.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Ketamine felt like instant addiction -- after one semi-excessive late night spree I was certain I couldn't continue messing with it.
102.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
The point is: there isn't a "right" way. That's exactly what the author is trying to say. By failing to recognize the ways in which they were different, they forced a mode upon them and here we are. A whole medicalized g
103.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Definitely choose Django
104.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Well, to start with, you'll need to study this dreadful blog post on inspecting RSC activity. And then read this: https://www.comfydeploy.com/blog/you-dont-need-nextjs Are you using the pages router or the app rou
105.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Indeed. "Oh but SPAs are so complex!" Folks are completely and utterly brainwashed by Vercel's marketing. Pondering an SSR rendered SPA with a wildcard route that calls `React.renderToPipeableStream` (or even simpler, uses `r
106.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
I hate RSC so much. Most hated technology of them all. And this very helpful / necessary blog post is infuriating, given that not so long ago the entirety of the react stack was capable of being held in one's head. It took very li
107.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Supportive parents. Bless
108.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
I'm still a critic in terms of actually using it, but what I find amazing about tailwind is how amenable it is to AI-generated workflows. It seriously works _so good_. Anything can be expressed, and systematically. There's somethi
109.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Keep dreaming man. Just look at what Next has become... It has taken "render component on the screen" and turned that into an experts domain. It's a nightmare for anyone who isn't the most skilled, for projects that are
110.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Server components + RN + Expo.... Could it get any more pointlessly complicated?
111.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
My technique is to feed it a series of intro questions that prepare it for the final task. Chat the thing into a proper comfort level, and then from there, with the context at hand, ask to help solve the real problem. Def feels like a new k
112.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
This whole article really resonates, especially the bits about expectations for others. My main problem is that, having done so much coding (too much), its easy to identify just how long something should take (on average), and so when I see
113.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
This is so true! Our codebase got radically simpler when we did the exact same thing. And faster too, in terms of page rendering. It is very unfortunate that the whole community is being pushed onto frameworks like this unnecessarily. All m
114.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
You've got this completely backwards. A Jr with an LLM is a recipe for disaster. They don't know the tech, and have no clue what the LLM is spitting back. They copy code into the abyss. Meanwhile, a sr with an LLM is a straight up
115.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Definitely getting there!
116.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
cmd + space + chatgpt desktop app = 80% of routine tasks are gone. its crazy
117.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
I was thinking the same thing -- the most fun learning to program one could imagine. This!
118.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
Out of curiosity, what are typically the conditions for a PIP for managers?
119.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
I have seen both sides of this, but most often its legitimately performance related. As in, IC pushes no code, calls in all the time, is generally unreliable, etc etc. But the manager side is almost worse, because the bad manager multiplier
120.
by sibeliuss 2y ago
I mean, assuming the person's performance didn't meet standards, the truth hurts. It's too easy to float as an engineer, and salaries are expensive.

More ›