shykes

31 ms·

361.
by shykes 10y ago
The gap is in fact huge. Try developing on Docker for Mac/Windows and deploying to production with Docker for AWS/Azure. Then try to build the same level of functionality yourself from naked kubernetes and only open-source tools.
362.
by shykes 10y ago
No, they're based on the likelihood of achieving massive growth in revenue. In consumer markets that often requires a winner-takes-all race. In the enterprise market, which is Docker's market, winner-take-all is not as central bec
363.
by shykes 10y ago
You can uncheck it in stable releases, but not in beta releases. This is so we can track error rates, crashes etc to make sure the stable releases are actually stable :)
364.
by shykes 10y ago
One reason for the name change is to clarify that Docker is a product . If you're looking to use Docker as a low-level component to run containers as part of another product, then you should not use Docker : instead you should use
365.
by shykes 10y ago
>> containerd is a different type of component entirely - in fact it is very complementary to kubernetes > You made the initial comparison. Yes, sorry I wasn't clear. I meant that they were both components, as opposed to compl
366.
by shykes 10y ago
There's no need to worry. `Docker CE` is the exact same Docker as before - just renamed to clarify the relationship to Docker EE. Docker is still open-source; it still has all the same features; it has the same maintainers and contribu
367.
by shykes 10y ago
There are more details on the release blog post: https://blog.docker.com/2017/03/docker-enterprise-edition/
368.
by shykes 10y ago
> k8s, for example, incorporates service discovery. As far as I can tell, swarmkit does not. k8s incorporates networking, containerd does not. Similar for things like ingress load balancing. Swarmkit does in fact implement service disc
369.
by shykes 10y ago
Yes. We have already started in 1.13. Check out the "docker stack" subcommand. https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/stack/
370.
by shykes 10y ago
It's true that 1 year support is not as long as many enterprise infrastructure products. We plan to expand it over time. But we've found that it's a good fit for our current offering, and the value enterprises are getting fro
371.
by shykes 10y ago
In a growth market you don't have to beat anyone. You just have to deliver enough value to enough customers to capture part of that growth in the form of revenue. Which is the purpose of Docker EE :)
372.
by shykes 10y ago
> Nice, no features anymore for CE What do you mean by that? Docker CE will continue to ship features in exactly the same way as before. If anything the new monthly edge releases will allow us to ship features faster. A common complain
373.
by shykes 10y ago
Hi, I'm the founder of Docker. > [...] a freemium model Docker had already adopted an enterprise subscription + freemium model, but the offering was less clear (case in point: you weren't aware of it). This clarifies and simp
374.
by shykes 10y ago
> I am wondering what people like Brendand Gregg think about docker. He will be speaking at Dockercon in April, so I suppose we'll find out soon enough.
375.
by shykes 10y ago
Docker has taken the direction of a loose collection of tools tied together by an integrated interface. So you have the choice of using the platform as a whole, or standing up your choice of individual components on their own, without any d
376.
by shykes 10y ago
The blog post being discussed here is the latest example. NOTE: the blog post has since been updated without acknowledging the inaccuracies in the earlier version.
377.
by shykes 10y ago
It's not infrequent to see occasional tension between vendors around the wording and timing of security disclosures. There are frequent examples of this with Google's Project Zero for example. As far as disagreements on the best w
378.
by shykes 10y ago
I don't think the material you're referring to qualifies as criticizing competitors at all. - The comparison table is part if an independent study, not authored or commissioned by Docker. - The table shows the strengths and weakne
379.
by shykes 10y ago
The post is in fact incorrect. The reason Nathan is not sharing more technical details is to protect the security of Red Hat users. Also, if hypothetically the full details made Red Hat look bad, is it fair to assume you would be calling Na
380.
by shykes 10y ago
Hi, I'm the founder of Docker. It's not my place to say whether comments should be downvoted or not, and I don't want to ignite teenage-drama arguments over who was mean to whom at recess - we get enough of that level of disc
381.
by shykes 10y ago
IR isn't a standard but there are efforts to standardize a stable subset. This would be useful for projects like Google's pnacl and Apple's bitcode. I'm guessing they currently must invest lots of effort to stay in sync
382.
by shykes 10y ago
containerd is built on top of runc. Optionally you can swap out runc and replace it with any oci-compatible backend, like for exame runv.
383.
by shykes 10y ago
This is perhaps my favorite use of Docker ever.
384.
by shykes 10y ago
The point and click is fully optional. Docker for AWS uses all the native AWS primitives, so you can script the install with any AWS client.
385.
by shykes 10y ago
If you hit any issues on the Docker side, let us know on the support forums and we'll fix it.
386.
by shykes 10y ago
Docker founder here. I keep reading articles stating that "the Docker API changes with every release", but the assertion is never backed by any specific examples. Has anyone here encountered an actual breaking change? If so, I wou
387.
by shykes 10y ago
I would recommend investigating the matter yourself, and making your own opinion. What specifically has been broken in past Docker releases? How have they handled it? How would you have handled it? If you do decide to interview with Docke
388.
by shykes 10y ago
That's incorrect. Dotcloud ran both stateless and stateful services on the same container fabric, unlike Heroku and every other PaaS. Specifically you could run a managed containerized postgres, mysql, mongodb, redis, rabbitmq, and cus
389.
by shykes 10y ago
You're absolutely right. I was focused on the subset of kub-based platforms which are container-focused and are overlapping more and more with Docker. But you're right, kub itself is a neatly generic orchestration component which
390.
by shykes 10y ago
No. Kubernetes was launched at the first Dockercon, with a very specific focus of "we want to help expand what can be done with Docker by leveraging the significant operational experience we accumulated at Google". They delivered

More ›