Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shrimpx
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
481.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
This is useful to know (wrt it being written in Vue/Nuxt): > It's complicated on purpose btw, I wanted to do it in ReasonML and GraphQL but I didn't have time as this was done in an afternoon hackathon
482.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
> I know roughly what the odds are that the bet will pay out > natural price In low-volume situations (almost all cryptoassets) you don't have these properties. The price is "fake"/random to begin with.
483.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
A core problem is that you don't need super fancy type systems to build robust systems in practice. After a certain threshold, type theory research is exploring what's possible in theory, like pure mathematics, not what would be g
484.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
Yeah I shouldn't have used the word fascism, which isn't what Marx/Lenin were prescribing. But in practice, the implementations of Nazi fascism and Bolshevik totalitarianism were virtually indistinguishable. Ultranationalist,
485.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
The core scenario in which it makes sense to buy property in bitcoin is if you already hold a ton of bitcoin. Then, selling the bitcoin in order to pay fiat for a house is the more cumbersome route to take.
486.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
But why wouldn't ballot handlers swap out paper votes, etc.? You can rig anything with improper safeguards.
487.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
That's a fair question but in if it's legal, why does it matter? People make their own financial decisions.
488.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
Trust as in the public trusting the vote? I'm afraid you can put political spin on and create distrust in pretty much anything.
489.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
If you bought your bitcoin with legit money, and then you exchanged the bicoin for a house, and you're doing your taxes correctly, how could that be money laundering?
490.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
They’re trying to find out if Facebook intentionally bypassed their own policies and allowed election propaganda to run wild because it was to their benefit. (E.g., a trump coup would have been good for Facebook.) Basically are they stupid
491.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
It’s not about the foot soldiers but about senators trying to reject the vote certification. The people outside were the polarized ammunition. “Look how angry the American patriots are, that’s proof that we need to reject the certification
492.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
What do Twitter and Reddit have to do with the first amendment?
493.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
Is the problem that people are hopping jobs (this was always the case), or that they're exiting the industry? I thought we're talking about the latter. I see a lot of software people quitting to take sabbaticals, to work on a proj
494.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
According to that lady, the Mexican drug war is an American psyop, and US Marines are the ones running the drug flow into the US.
495.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
Trump's and Giuliani's incessant campaign can be seen as domestic terror: "to intimidate and coerce a civilian population", "to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion". The capitol &qu
496.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
Can't you say that about anything? The IRS, DOJ, NSA, Supreme Court. You can claim they were all created by whatever party was in majority power, to go after their political opponents. And it often is politically advantageous to claim
497.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
I don't believe that. It would take too much work to have a coverup like that, especially as total nitwits are elected to congress constantly. To address that, you'd have to say that no, people are divided into two camps with an i
498.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
You're implying that democrats are doing all this PsyOps preparing to rule the country indefinitely? From where I sit, democrats are lame ducks who are set to get swept in 22 and 24.
499.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
The coup is not about the people with trump flags seizing power. It's about trump and congresspeople inside the building trying to reject the vote certification by using the anger of the people outside as justification. And yes, there&
500.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
Sock shoe sock shoe means you get dressed but hold off putting on your socks until you're about to put your shoes on and get out the door. The advantage is you don't put dirt/dust, and whatever else you drag off your floors,
501.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
Thanks, I could have sworn that before I switched back to iOS, I was getting a bunch of "<X> loved a message" from iOS users. Maybe it improved in newer iterations.
502.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
It's not the color, but the fact that the person with green bubbles will not see what you see if you use comment reactions or replies -- for example if you put a heart reaction on a comment, the android user will not see a heart on the
503.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
The huge gap between aspirations and technology continues to be the core problem for the crypto space. I keep seeing the excuse “it’s still early days”, but it’s been 14 years since the inception of proof of work blockchains. 14 years is t
504.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
> It's possible to place illegal content onto the Bitcoin blockchain. I wonder if Bitcoin already has illegal content in it.
505.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
I wonder how this works out from a legal perspective. It seems like an NFT is a contract, that never expires, to host content at a URL. Can a buyer sue the seller if the seller shuts down the serving of that image? Otherwise an NFT is just
506.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
There's a lot of nice Python code out there, mostly written by disciplined and experienced systems people. But I agree about the hordes of data scientists making copy and paste spaghetti. This is evidenced by companies deploying Jupyte
507.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
I like types, but I have a hard time seeing them in Python. If I was forced to use only typed Python, I'd just use golang and get a ton of performance and concurrency that I could never get in typed Python. Good point about Django thou
508.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
My question is will this product be successful in the hands of the new owner? The signal of success is so low -- a few hundred dollars in revenue -- that it could well be random noise. I'd like to see any data showing the success rate
509.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
That's why I resist python types. A lot of the usefulness and interestingness of Python is in its dynamic features which aid in rapidly developing complex systems. Hard to imagine a strictly typed future for Python, when you then have
510.
▲
by
shrimpx
5y ago
> marijuana was not addictive It's "not addictive" in the sense that physical withdrawal symptoms are minimal compared to booze, nicotine, and other drugs. But you can make a daily habit out of anything pleasurable and rui
More ›