shkkmo

20 ms·

241.
by shkkmo 1y ago
> That is both a large sample size, It doesn't matter how large your sample size is if your sampling method is biased. This could be measuring market share gain/loss in different segments of a steady employment environment. &gt
242.
by shkkmo 1y ago
When you break the rules of a game in a way that can impact the outcome of the game, that is called "cheating" and is most definitely not fair. If you're trying to argue for a concept, you'll be much more effective if yo
243.
by shkkmo 1y ago
It is a valid claim, I still fail to see what point you are making? You seem to think that breakkng the rules isn't cheating and that making up a random and unrelated stupid rule somehow makes that point? That's my best guess and
244.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Are you making a point or just a random comment with no purpose?
245.
by shkkmo 1y ago
> a notorious game requiring a large amount of skill to play, and isn't a tax on the math illiterate. Nobody but you mentioned skill. Plenty of mathematically literate people play the lottery for fun, knowing the the expected value
246.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Far more people than Nettles think this was unfair and there were definitely laws broken and skirted. That is why there is a scandal. > In the aftermath of the 2023 bulk buy, Texas politicians put much of the blame on the couriers. The c
247.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Fun names are OK, but only if they don't introduce ambiguity. In this case the change wasn't so much anti-fun as anti-ambiguity.
248.
by shkkmo 1y ago
> It has, fwiw, also historically not been seen as a core right for thousands of years. So i think it's a harder argument to make than you think despite the EU coming around on this. This doesn't seem true. I'd assume you
249.
by shkkmo 1y ago
> It's ridiculous, sure but is it less ridiculous than AI companies claiming that the copyrights shouldn't apply to them because it will be bad for their business? Since that wasn't ever a real argument, your strawman is i
250.
by shkkmo 1y ago
That is not what what "glib" means. The comment is still a shallow, glib dismisal and doesn't add anything to the conversation.
251.
by shkkmo 1y ago
The doxxing is questinable, but much less questionable than your presentation of events. Coinhive earned 35% of everything mined on any site, not just the image board. They had no means stopping malicious installations from stealing from us
252.
by shkkmo 1y ago
The thread is this. #1 Troy works for Microsoft. #2 No Troy doeys, as he clearly states. #3 Being a Microsoft Regional Director makes him an employee and any claims otherwise are based on some arbitrary semantic distiction, not a real diffe
253.
by shkkmo 1y ago
And I'll repeat myself: those weren't attempts to argue the title isnt confusing.
254.
by shkkmo 1y ago
> I'm saying those are bad attempts to argue that it's not a confusing title. You might want to reread, nobody was arguing that. > We can debate semantics but if you describe yourself with a job title attached to a company t
255.
by shkkmo 1y ago
"Microsoft Regional Director" is not a job title, it is an award. You thinking it sounds like a job title doesn't make it a job title, it makes you confused. Being given an award does not make you an employee, especially when
256.
by shkkmo 1y ago
"Microsoft Regional Director" is not a job title. It is an award that Microsoft gives out only to non-employees. You might think the award has a confusing name, and you would be correct. What you cannot be correct in asserting is
257.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Yes, those are better names. That doesn't make him a Microsoft employee.
258.
by shkkmo 1y ago
The things he mentioned are of the same class, so yes, it does "extend the logic". Just because the name for something is confusing, that doesn't change the nature of the thing named.
259.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Nobody is really disputing that Microsoft chose a confusing award name. However that name being confusing doesn't mean he is an employee or anything really like an employee.
260.
by shkkmo 1y ago
> However, I lost all hope (of the little I had) after their sales rep said they "densify" their wood. You lost hope because they used an industry standard term?
261.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Since the other 2 of the 3 major rating agencies had already made this downgrade...I guess they're all targets and all that already happened to them?
262.
by shkkmo 1y ago
> Looking very briefly at the paper and speculating wildly, I could imagine that the company who were subject of it - or their staff - might not appreciate it and have put pressure on MIT?? The apparent issue is that the data appears to
263.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Plagarism is often illegal. If you use plagarism to obtain a financial or other benefit, that can be fraud.
264.
by shkkmo 1y ago
The comment is responding to this line: > If an AI reads 100 scientific papers and churns out a new one, it is plagiarism. That is a specific claim that is being directly addressed and pretty clearly qualifies as "good faith".
265.
by shkkmo 1y ago
> If a savant has perfect recall, remembers text perfectly and rearranges that text to create a marginally new text, he'd be sued for breach of copyright. Any suits would be based on the degree the marginally new copy was fair use.
266.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Tesla has been working on improving a level 2 system that works everywhere while Waynlmo has been working on expanding the capabilities and coverage of their level 4 system that works in limited areas and requires detailed mapping. Tesla ha
267.
by shkkmo 1y ago
I have some sympathy. Those communities are valuable and should be saved where possible. However, it also doesn't make sense to keep rebuiling the same high risk locations, especially when all indications are rhat the risk is increasin
268.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Did you respond to the right comment?
269.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Perhaps because they read the article: > horses are big and react poorly to being wounded: a solid arrow hit on a horse is very likely to disable both horse and rider. And while light or archer cavalry might limit exposure to mass arrow
270.
by shkkmo 1y ago
Proton is open source, so AFAIK, nobody had to pay to use it.

More ›