Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shkkmo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
181.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
Sometimes some people seem to need to learn lessons the hard way. It's much better if that hard lesson comes on a scooter rather than in a car. If we can get people to go to bars/etc on rental scooters then they won't have a
182.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> Hmm, I don't want to put words into your mouth here Kinda seems like you do since I didn't say anything like that. > surely you can't be saying "I believe those civilians are being slaughtered/collectively p
183.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> on a per capita basis, the rate of fatal accidents among motorcyclists with license, registration, insurance, and helmets is 30% that of motorcyclists who have none of those things When presented with unsourced statistics on the web, p
184.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
Yeah, I personally would choose a bike over a scooter. However I would much rather have an drunk idiot on a scooter than driving a car.
185.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> The problem with escooters is that basically any accident is "bad" Factually false. Out of well over 1000 annual collosions in GB in 2023 there were a a handful of deaths but they were all the e-scooter riders. > The real
186.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> You don’t need to pay anything more than what it takes to get you to someone else or a common meeting spot like a walk through the park. You also need somone to go take that walk with you and the social skills to organize it Yes, it is
187.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> That’s equivalent to saying that if you don’t have a motorcycle license, don’t register your bike, don’t have insurance, and don’t wear your helmet, your fatal accident risk increases by over 3x. That's not really how statistics w
188.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> "Do you believe that absolute numbers of civilian casualties determine morality in war? I don't." I believe it matters how many people you kill. Killing more people is bad. I think the overall morality is complicated and
189.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> "Not seeing any other reason" doesn't seem to be a particularly strong argument. But let's take it at face value. Estimates of German civilian deaths during WW2 range from 1.5m to 3m people: To be fair, I think the
190.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
Only on MacOS and iOS...
191.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
For a while, streaming was better than any alternative. However over the last several year prices have a spike while the collections available for streaming have shrunk and splintered. Then a bunch of the streaming sites started adding ads
192.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
I don't see any other reason to kill 17,000 kids like that except as collective punishment or genocide. You seem pretty clear that it was neither so I'll leave it up to you to provide another reasonable explanation for why Isreal
193.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> I agree, it's too niche a product I don't think it is that niche. I think lots of people would take advantage of it not just for their kids, but themselves. The problem is that it is a feature that makes YouTube less "st
194.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> The appropriate question is does this meet the intent requirements for collective punishment? Let's put Netanyahu in front of the ICC and let the lawyers figure it out. Edit: That isn't tongue in cheek, I think it is one of t
195.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> when children are unintentionally killed Oops, I killed 17,000 kids, totally an accident, my bad, so I'm just gonna keep doing the same thing, but I said it was an accident so that's totally cool right? You realize that'
196.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
I would hazard a guess is that a generation of youth has been addicted to gambling by mobile game companies and even some desktop game companies like Valve (which has worked to limit it, but only when it was forced to by bad publicity.) Gam
197.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> It's quite another to claim "collective punishment", and that doesn't stand up to scrutiny. 17,000 kids killed directly by Isreal. > the UN refuses to collect them and distribute them A blatant lie. Actual news
198.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
I wouldn't call it a "movement" but rather a limited legal framework based on agreements. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribal_sovereignty_in_the_Unit...
199.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
You are correct that the mention of the new law doesn't really make sense in the context of the article. The currently state of affairs is that "e-bikes" with more than 750W didn't have a legal classification. They could
200.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
The link you added to the HPCBike actually looks far more like an bike than many of the much slower class 2 e-bikes that are sold. Appearance isn't that helpful when it comes to enforcement or crafting regulations. It is, however, a gr
201.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
You've misunderstood that law. > By law, an electric bicycle is a bicycle that (1) has operable foot pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts and (2) qualifies as a class 1, class 2, or class 3 bicycle https://
202.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
That's not an e-bike. That's an e-moto. It is sold and marketed as an e-moto and has no pedals. Depending on the jusrisdiction. these can often only be legally ridden on private property since they aren't street legal motorcy
203.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> I personally don't see a difference between large motor with capped speed and a small motor legally speaking. Try getting hit by them, you'll feel a pretty big difference. My Zero in a custom riding mode that limits its speed
204.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> That's the difference between a motorcycle and an e-bike, not speed. Not legally. I would argue that the presence of pedals matters much less than the power and weight of the device when it comes to how it should be regulated. Pow
205.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> It’s not clear that such speeds are actually capable on stock parts from nearly any electric bicycle, and legal electric bikes are not capable of exceeding either 20 or 28 mph, depending on their classification, It's like the auth
206.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
I think including specific stories is already an ethical hacking violation. Including the pseudonyms associated with those stories creates unnecessary risk of, and arguably incentive for those individuals. I also just don't get the min
207.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
Perhaps you should try doing the same, instead of treating it as a parody why not step out of your attachment to your own voews and try to engage with it as a genuine statement?
208.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
Doesn't that Gemini summary gist tie usernames to pretty specific highly personal non-public stories? That seems like a significant violation of ethical hacking principles.
209.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
Artemis and SLS have many problems but I would look elsewhere than that article if you want an understanding of what they are and why they exist.
210.
▲
by
shkkmo
1y ago
> It might be true, but that's not the same as "accurate". Let's imagine the same thing but for cyclists: I don't understand the disctinction you are trying to draw here. The statement itself is both accurate and
More ›