shkkmo

30 ms·

511.
by shkkmo 2y ago
I didn't say "every little bit helps". "80/20" absolutely can't be applied to "almost everything" and assuming it can is lazy thinking. Even if it does apply in this case, just because as seconda
512.
by shkkmo 2y ago
If a problem has multiple causes, only addressing one of them seem like a mistake.
513.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> Waymo has spent more money, resources and started earlier than Tesla and yet it is only marginally better than Tesla at this point. Tesla isn't even comparable to Waymo at this point because Tesla has zero level 4 capability. Tesl
514.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> you completely missed the point of rate-of-innovation How is the "rate of innovation" higher but yet they've innovated less and have a less functional product? It's made up metric and was ignored because it adds no
515.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> Any driver that makes this kind of move is typically in the top 5%ile of driving skills. Hard disagree. It's pretty clear the car just didn't understand what the line of cars was doing. > level of intelligence that needs t
516.
by shkkmo 2y ago
You are correct, Waymo has not solved the economics of robotaxis yet. However Waymo does have a huge head start on the solution. Waymo has been able to manage their scale growth to manage the cost of finding these solutions. It seems like a
517.
by shkkmo 2y ago
Tesla is still stuck at Level 3 while Waymo has been operating at level 4 for years. If Tesla does manag to jump straight from level 3 to level 5, they have a chance to compete, but that seems unlikely. They also might move to level 4 and b
518.
by shkkmo 2y ago
I don't think Meet is bundled with Android. My pixel didn't come with it. It is bundled with some chromebooks.
519.
by shkkmo 2y ago
The people who read the article tend to filter into the comments a bit slower because of, well, reading the article.
520.
by shkkmo 2y ago
How does accidentally stomping the gas instead of the brake lock up the rear brakes to leave a 50ft skid?
521.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> I hate to break it to you but people do not meet that standard either and misunderstand each other plenty Sure, and there are ways to tell when people don't understand the words they use. One of the ways to check how well people u
522.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> Got it, so an LLM only understands my words if it has full mastery of every new problem domain within a few thousand milliseconds of the first time the problem has been posed in the history of the world. That's not what I said. Pl
523.
by shkkmo 2y ago
This is false. California passed AB 51 in 2016 which codified lane splitting under California law. There is no mention of "air cooling". There are guidelines that say you should not go more than 10 mph faster than traffic and not
524.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> Does that, however, mean bicycles should swerve between cars like motorcycles in CA ( and lately -- illegally -- in IL ) or go against the traffic diagonally? In my anecdotal experience driving all over the country, aggressive bike rid
525.
by shkkmo 2y ago
"unprovability" is not a property that it is necessary to prove to pick something as an axiom. There is generally a project to reduce axioms to the simplest and weakest forms required to make a proof. This is does result in axioms
526.
by shkkmo 2y ago
This is such a good explanation of stuff I've been thinking for a while. It seems like the PR campaign to expand copyright to cover AI training has been very successful and I have low hopes for the trend in public sentiment to reverse.
527.
by shkkmo 2y ago
Amusingly, the author does not appear to fully understand the meaning of "axiom". While practice, axioms are often statements that we all agree on and accept as true, that isn't necessarily true and isn't the core of it&
528.
by shkkmo 2y ago
Maps are useful, but they don't understand the geography they describe. LLMs are maps of semantic structures and as such, can absolutely be useful without having an understanding of that which they map. If LLMs were capable of understa
529.
by shkkmo 2y ago
Becareful with mixing up 'can' and 'does'. Computers right now do not understand language, but that does not mean that they cannot. We don't know what it takes to bridge the gap from stochastic parrot to understandi
530.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> You either have a misunderstanding of the GDPR, or you are going out of your way to defend and downplay the issues. I have a sufficient understanding to call you on your "non-literal" claims. Call it what you will, but if you
531.
by shkkmo 2y ago
Remote work was a rapidly growing trend and had already doubled in the decade before Covid. Covid accelerated that growth but didn't create the trend.
532.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> How can you not care when companies choosing to go fully remote means you have less options to find in-office jobs? The world is not designed to be optimized for you, nor should it be. I think it is the height of selfishness to push fo
533.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> Seriously, go look at my earlier replies. I did, you mentioned 'treaties' for the first time in your last comment. The ability of the USA to prosecute Kim DotCom didn't depend on any treaty. The extradition process did,
534.
by shkkmo 2y ago
I think the size also makes a difference. Each speeding ticket is a small sum that isn't worth the travel to fight. Losing an entire car is several orders of magnitude more expensive. Since Austria already has speeding tickets, I'
535.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> These still are not good examples. Every country has laws to prosecute spies, and copyright has numerous international treaties. You are just moving the goal post yet again. I fail to see any difference between laws that govern forieng
536.
by shkkmo 2y ago
Given that, as the article states, police have to prove the violation before they can permanently confiscate the property, that is not an accurate description. It is only when you allow police to sieze anything and then require you to dispr
537.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> I'm curious how enforced that law actually is. Enforcement of the anti-bribery laws isn't really targeted at individuals traveling for fun. It is more meant to stop businesses from bribing officials. > this is significantl
538.
by shkkmo 2y ago
Perhaps you should re-read what you wrote. You specifically stated that US law does not apply to US citizens abroad. In addition, one of my examples specifically allows the prosecution of non-us citizens for their actions abroad toward US c
539.
by shkkmo 2y ago
> US law as written is entirely reasonable and doesn't try to claim the law applies to US citizens anywhere in the world. It absolutely does. The USA has laws that govern what it's own citizens do abroad like. You aren't a
540.
by shkkmo 2y ago
Microsoft had a known, high consequence, security flaw that they did not acknowledge or fix, they had evidence that indicated it had already been exploited and they knew they had limited to no ability monitor for exploitation. This choice l

More ›