shirederby

7 ms·

31.
Virtual Children, Genome Sequencing for Everyone, and Forget Genetic Privacy(reason.com)
2 points by shirederby 14y ago|0 comments
32.
by shirederby 14y ago
If you're assuming, without reading, that it's taking a "pro-intervention stance," you obviously do not know enough about Reason's typical content to make such sweeping claims.
33.
by shirederby 14y ago
Zach, he did not end rendition, though he did end some of the most appalling practices formerly involved. We also have very little way of verifying, beyond leaked information, that the administration has behaved consistently with its polici
34.
by shirederby 14y ago
aidenn0, I explicitly addressed that in the last sentence of my remark.
35.
by shirederby 14y ago
...I don't, err, get it. I have a couple ideas but I'm not confident enough in them to assume veracity.
36.
by shirederby 14y ago
Johnson or Stein? One or the other (could be) a more principled vote (I don't know what your full "checklist" is, although you clearly differ from Johnson on healthcare, at least). Johnson looks very likely to be on all states' ballots in N
37.
by shirederby 14y ago
I don't know if the update that added it was present when you read it, but the quote from TechDirt explains why it might be a "privacy disaster." And the post on OpenCongress mentions that "inclusion of this report [to examine the legality
38.
by shirederby 14y ago
It is reasonable to question whether civil liberties were among the "main things" Obama ran on; however, they it is clear that they were present . Beyond the aforementioned platform changes, you can see, for instance, the last section of t
39.
by shirederby 15y ago
I was curious about this, so I searched around a bit. This is the most recent I found -- a median of 3.1 percent: http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/08/19/us-hospitals-usa-i...