shigawire

5 ms·

31.
by shigawire 4mo ago
It is to make a system where people are less incentivized to commit crimes.
32.
by shigawire 4mo ago
That part was intentional
33.
by shigawire 4mo ago
If you have artifacts saved as you develop it can use those when writing docs to capture intent and design decisions.
34.
by shigawire 5mo ago
I don't think "cheating" is the right way to frame it. A junior has managers pushing them to do more, faster. You review the code but do you really understand it the same as if you struggled through it? Do you ever build the
35.
by shigawire 5mo ago
I'd rather the AI providers bear the cost of the externalities they inflict on the world. If the cost to users is reasonable with that added burden I'll happily pay it. If it is not viable without passing costs on society, then th
36.
by shigawire 5mo ago
I'd say the people complaining about AI likely see EVs as having some utility. While AI may have some utility, the amount of resources invested seems to make it more of a ponzi scheme waiting to pop.
37.
by shigawire 5mo ago
Because they've been propagandized and don't have the time or inclination to think differently.
38.
by shigawire 5mo ago
>trying to manage a confiscatory bureaucracy would have the same issues It would be a cat and mouse game but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try. Like how funding the IRS appropriately increases government revenue.
39.
by shigawire 5mo ago
As a "young" coder I am hesitant because I don't have decades of skills to fall back on. It is even more abstraction, even harder to follow the code I'm "writing" with AI. Also I have a fear that if/when t
40.
by shigawire 5mo ago
Good luck, I'm naming all my variables openclaw1, openclaw2, etc
41.
by shigawire 5mo ago
They want to say that non-whites are naturally dumber than whites. There will be varying degrees of subtlety but that's what the dog whistlers are on about.
42.
by shigawire 5mo ago
Many, many seems like overstating a rare corner case that can easily be proven.
43.
by shigawire 5mo ago
> almost everyone working on SaaS; not in all cases, but the absolute majority work on SaaS means creating artificial scarcity in order to extract value from people. Maybe this is just my lack of understanding in how most SaaS companies
44.
by shigawire 5mo ago
Is that true or just a rumor? All the family medicine people I know would not do that. Only in a case where it is 50/50 bacterial or viral like an ear infection in a young kid.
45.
by shigawire 6mo ago
Because it obviously doesn't have the capability. Similar to how the US has no capability to "win" from the air only.
46.
by shigawire 6mo ago
With private, you get exactly what you want, whenever you want it... If you can afford it.
47.
by shigawire 6mo ago
Minor nit - enterprise EMRs brand themselves as EHR because they consider it more encompassing than just medical records. I agree on other points.
48.
by shigawire 6mo ago
I hate to be the AI guy, but a coach that lived in my terminal and corrected me when I do it the slow way would actually help.
49.
by shigawire 6mo ago
>I think there is a chance that these systems will lead to a change where the note isn't the fundamental record of the encounter. Instead different artifacts are created specifically for each entity that needs it. Billing gets their
50.
by shigawire 6mo ago
> Why does it have to be a world changing life altering experience? Because the global economy has been wagered on this
51.
by shigawire 6mo ago
> Because they dont want to be the person maintaining this, so we should those people not self-hosting a free software now go one step further and also build those products? If one thinks AI can do this eventually then it makes sense. Bu
52.
by shigawire 6mo ago
The disillusionment comes from hospital admins constantly squeezing blood from a stone. Patient populations are up, nursing FTEs down. Support staff down.
53.
by shigawire 6mo ago
>Nothing about the current state of the healthcare system makes much sense to anyone that tries to peel back the onion. I'd offer a slight tweak. None makes sense in a vacuum or solely considering efficiency. It all makes sense seei
54.
by shigawire 7mo ago
More likely assumed (perhaps rightfully) that there would be no consequences anyway.
55.
by shigawire 7mo ago
Or if you say we should slow down your competence is questioned by others who are going very fast (and likely making mistakes we won't find until later). And there is an element of uncertainty. Am I just bad at using these new tools? T
56.
by shigawire 7mo ago
Probably a mix of naivety, ignorance, and apathy. Most people are just trying to get through their day and not worry about ethical questions. I'd say that's terrible, but I'm not confident I'd be a better person if my li
57.
by shigawire 7mo ago
Thanks for the response, I'll update my post to be clear I was not calling this post an astroturfing attempt.
58.
by shigawire 7mo ago
I'll not dispute the impact on expansion and consolidation, but I will say in recent months I have seen a number of hit pieces on the 340B program, mostly bankrolled by pharma companies (not this one just calling out the trend). The ex
59.
by shigawire 7mo ago
Probably does
60.
by shigawire 7mo ago
This is probably not the place for this discussion, good luck

More ›