shakow

66 ms·

901.
by shakow 6y ago
Not much better, not much worse I guess http://www.hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/ETH
902.
by shakow 6y ago
They are actively working on it ( https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/multicore-ocaml-may-2020-update/... ) (HN discussion here, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23380370 ).
903.
by shakow 6y ago
It depends on how it comes out once you divide by the time & resources you invested in the making of the game.
904.
by shakow 6y ago
Published under a free license ( https://github.com/delehef/hyades ) if you prefer to self-host :)
905.
Show HN: Hyades, a newsletter for your starred Git repos(hyades.info)
1 points by shakow 6y ago|1 comments
906.
by shakow 6y ago
> This basically applies to all programming? That's true. But if you should describe the essence of probabilistic programming to someone used only to “classical” scientific computing, what would be the key point(s)? BTW, I'm so
907.
by shakow 6y ago
> Polarizers essentially just project the electric field of the wave onto some axis Where goes the energy of the orthogonal component of the field? Absorbed by the polarizer, reflected, ... ?
908.
by shakow 6y ago
It's probably just me being dense, but I don't understand how much prob. prog. differs from “traditional” programming. I just read the tutorials & examples for Turing and Gen, and to me, it seems that they are more or less nif
909.
by shakow 6y ago
> I've never understood why anyone uses the number of pages of the reference document as an argument I guess that, assuming that all refs have roughly the same information density, it gives a rough idea of the “size” of the language
910.
by shakow 6y ago
> Their electrons would radiate energy when orbiting What phenomenon would make them lose energy?