Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shakna
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
91.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
The headlines about destruction came not soon after they got rapped on the knuckles and told "no more pirating".
92.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
I wholeheartedly believe the AI controversy on destroying books is being stirred up by the companies themselves. Copyright law requires you destroy a book, if you format shift it. If you digitise, you need to ensure its not a "copy&quo
93.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
> A 'program' that was not asked to hack a remote source did so. What exactly who do you charge with what? We have nearly thirty years of precedence on that. [0] Collateral damage, does not remove the responsibility from the cr
94.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
If the FBI is involved, then why is no one being charged for the cybercrime?
95.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Hasn't Python always guaranteed messing with __annotations__ directly, as unsafe? This isn't some bug. It's documented behaviour.
96.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Not really a different topic. All commands go into the same prompt system. If one part can accidentally be breached, then it can also deliberately be breached. Injection remains a problem.
97.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
It may very well be that SK doesn't feel confident to defend themselves _with_ the USA on their soil. So the best option is to obviate the need.
98.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Prompt injection. Solved. But accidentally breaking systems is not an issue either, obviously. Even though the system prompt asks for safety rails, and other prompts wouldn't accidentally violate that. https://www.abc.net.au
99.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Scheme is hygeneic, yes. Which is why sandboxing works. If you want to manipulate the current environment, and defeat half the point of the language, then you're allowed that through (user-initial-environment). (define-syntax) will als
100.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
That document, shows several forms: https://conservatory.scheme.org/schemers/Documents/Standards...
101.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Just to run with the joke - one project I worked on was a CPython extension. We used Chicken to build out our library to do some rather hacky things and bring async/await to Python before it supported it. And we did call it basilisk.
102.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
I've only made the one game with it. A lot more GUI apps. sdl is in the package manager, making it fairly easy to hook into, and "standard". From there its about the same as anything else. Because I was cross-compiling, I com
103.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
R5RS supports reader macros? Which would be 1998, and I guess only 28 years ago. That's why SRFI-49 and its descendants were a possibility. Wisp, JavaScript, brainfuck, etc. implementations all exist because the tools exist in the lang
104.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Spam is generally defined as "unwanted and/or unsolicited communication". Which I'm pretty sure an unsolicited sales call, from a genuine business, still is.
105.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
I'm not seeing the less friendly... Eval, and sandboxing eval, are builtin features of the Scheme standard.
106.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Mistral aren't an EU mouthpiece. They're a startup backed by Microsoft, nVidia, and Salesforce.
107.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
This is Australia. The ACCC doesn't screw around. "harmful cancellation practices, including automatic renewals, early termination fees and non-cancellation clauses" are all illegal. Exit fees can't be excessive. If ther
108.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Afraid 16bit Word versions have a "Garbage" rating on Wine.
109.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Sorry, I do have a bias. > 11.40% of TX electricity is from solar This is... Not a huge statement to me. My home state is at 16% solar, and we're calling it inadequate. [0] Its not a 1-to-1, as we have probably 10% of the people, an
110.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
If modern ads weren't built to be intentionally manipulative to the nth degree, whilst also extracting a huge amount of private data of the viewer, I might be more tolerant of them.
111.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
I'm afraid at this point, that sounds more like a you problem. You're judging people for something inconsequential. Your reasons are your own but... Probably worth some introspection here.
112.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
15th for non-residential? Sounds like people overwhelmingly put it on their roofs, and politicians avoid it.
113.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
That sounds like you associate anime with childhood cartoons? But considering how much of that industry output is 16+ or 18+ (usually violence and themes), I'd say that is more of a cultural confabulation. I would absolutely not expect
114.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Why do you consider it so strongly to be inappropriate? It literally does not tell me anything about the user. DOS was built in a basement. Pretty sure suit and tie wasn't the dejour whilst they were doing it. Linux was a hobby project
115.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Most pre-LLM systems also blocked badly behaved user agents... And right now, most LLM-suppliers, are badly behaved agents.
116.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
As part of a much larger series of initiatives towards digital sovereignty, yes. [0] [0] https://commission.europa.eu/news-and-media/news/strengtheni...
117.
▲
Programming the Gigatron
(iwriteiam.nl)
19 points
by
shakna
2mo ago
|
1 comments
118.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
My government's solution to this, is a physical office, where they will file the paperwork for you. You may have an average wait time of four hours to be seen, and so must devote an entire working day to the effort, but can submit with
119.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Every advert for TV and radio has to pass a review in most jurisdictions. Billboard laws vary wildly, but some also require a review. Why not ads online? The industry would adapt pretty much overnight, because it is something everyone alrea
120.
▲
by
shakna
2mo ago
Correlating data with another source is half of what data brokers do, so I wouldn't really say that is any level of privacy protection.
More ›