Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shakna
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
34 ms
·
841.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Each new Android SDK has breaking changes to the API. All of them break compatibility.
842.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Debian's guide was great when it was written [0], but it's so stale now. I wish someone had the time/need to update it at times. [0] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-manual/in.
843.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
The obvious question there is... Has it ever happened in yours?
844.
▲
Our Farewell from Google Play
(secuso.aifb.kit.edu)
338 points
by
shakna
1y ago
|
126 comments
845.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Police, in many countries, have already been found to violate the laws protecting surveillance systems that already exist. If a warrant doesn't stop them today, why do you think it will tomorrow?
846.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
It's not "cope". Switzerland created a new set of surveillance laws in January, that far exceed anything inside the EU. Which means that EU laws are irrelevant, when talking about a company inside Switzerland - you should be
847.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
... You're suggesting Switzerland is subject to EU surveillance laws? Instead of the ones they put in planning in January?
848.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Wire is located in Switzerland. Outside the EU.
849.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Or QNX for the price of Windows, for a certified UNIX.
850.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
They're no longer a child. That is why they have a different nomenclature - teenager. They are not "a kid". Treating an adolescent as a child is damaging to their mental state [0]. I already said boundaries are a thing: You a
851.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
> Who's in charge here, you or your kids? As a parent you're not in charge of a teenager. You're there to guide them, and try to protect them from their bad choices, but they have reached a point where they are beginning t
852.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
I don't see a world where this won't be abused. Maybe by the authorities, furthering policies already in place to deal with people who don't toe a certain line of thought. Probably by people outside the law, who now have a fa
853.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Most well-known date library systems have failed in places. Quite a few, still do. So whilst you might get some known regression to test against, nothing can give you a foolproof guide. You can have reasonable confidence that here there be
854.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Perplexity certainly was ignoring robots.txt [0] Anthropic... Their robots.txt requires a delay to be defined, even though its an optional extension. But whatever. [0] https://www.wired.com/story/perplexity-is-a-bullshi
855.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
I was surprised to hit this one today. Government department, supporting exactly one browser on most people's main device. https://www.ato.gov.au/online-services/technical-support/min...
856.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Almost all telcos in the US sell data to brokers. Like for example, when they got caught selling location data they were required to protect. [0] [0] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/29/fcc_telecom_fines&#x
857.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
I really wouldn't call something you need to write, to make something happen, "syntactic sugar". Otherwise types are just sugar. Indicies are just sugar. Lists are just sugar.
858.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
> Airplane tickets used to cost a lot more for economy class, even adjusted for inflation and fees. To get the equivalent service and quality today you simply have to pay more, you just have the choice of paying very little for very low
859.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
You attacked. > You just made that up... I mean as much as we complain about LLMs hallucinating, here's an example of a human making shit up out of thin air You called me a liar, delusional, and accused me of making up shit. As you
860.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Implicit conversion, which is what you're mostly referring to here, is not required. It happens in some languages, and not others. Because I'm tired, and this is a very basic topic, I'm afraid I'm just going to rip from
861.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
It usually hit, when a dependency of programs gets shoved out into cask. The moment where that happens, and where the things listing it as a dependency realise its now cask and not the main repo, is not altogether in sync.
862.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
It's been five years for my data point, but every single time it came time to update brew, I hit something else I'd never seen before. Every time, it broke. And from what I can see, migrations are still causing issues. [0] [0] ht
863.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
It's not casting. (char*)21 != "21" Casting is converting the container, the interpretation. What you're reaching for is type conversion. Some languages have "implicit conversion" when casting, but the
864.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
So... Attack first? That what you're going with? DKE has been confirmed more than anything else. It was one of the few things not hit by the replication crisis. You're assessing how well you do, when aided or not, by a tool. That&
865.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Not what the author of React says: > Yes, the first prototype of React was written in SML; we then moved onto OCaml. > Jordan transcribed the prototype into JS for adoption; the SML version of React, however great it might be, would h
866.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Facebook and their Reason?
867.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
"You can’t be deluded about positives usefulness." If that were true, then we would not have the Dunning-Kruger effect. Regardless of your intelligence, all of us are susceptible to a cognitive bias that makes us think that we are
868.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Not the author, but another author here and... Well, it has a problem with my use of the Oxford comma, for one. Because a huge amount of the corpus is American English, and mine ain't. So it fails on grammar repeatedly. And if you intr
869.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
You're the outlier - and the explanation is simple. Where you are, divorce and family court filings are part of the public record. A request isn't necessary, because the background checking org already can see the full documentati
870.
▲
by
shakna
1y ago
Go get a background check, as legally required for most job applications. Equifax cares about more than just your credit rating. But as you call it a "decree", and I only know one legal system that does (Texas), we're probabl
More ›