shakna

50 ms·

781.
by shakna 1y ago
Whilst that's true... Using "faithful" is inviting criticism where it doesn't align - intended or not.
782.
by shakna 1y ago
Not a loop hole. The Minister may declare anything to be a social media site. The law does not restrict what may be considered.
783.
by shakna 1y ago
A small note: Lua 5.4 changed the way random happens. Its now based on xoshiro256**. Thats still not crytographically secure, but it is vastly faster.
784.
by shakna 1y ago
I actually just posted it to HN, because of the likelihood someone here is in DE's circles and can help point it out. (I think some of their devs chime in here, now and then.) Contacting them directly on this has happened. But with sil
785.
Digital Extremes violate the cURL license(github.com)
16 points by shakna 1y ago|4 comments
786.
TwinBASIC(github.com)
5 points by shakna 1y ago|0 comments
787.
by shakna 1y ago
So... You know a proxy is not legal... But felt the need to make me explain which facets it would cover...? Yeah, I'm not continuing this convetsation.
788.
by shakna 1y ago
That would violate the license. > However, nothing other than this License grants you permission to propagate or modify any covered work. These actions infringe copyright if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or prop
789.
by shakna 1y ago
Not just a level of indirection. The "substantial features" of the code need to not be directly exposed. So if you had some AGPL OCR tool you were using, you could use it, but not in a way the user sees that text. Generate audio f
790.
by shakna 1y ago
Stuxnet did not require a bootrom zero day. Just people's propensity to plug in USB devices out of curiosity. You don't need the NSA to target someone and replace their device with a malware driven one. Just a porch pirate and you
791.
by shakna 1y ago
We already have that today. And locked down systems don't prevent it, because you can always exploit some part of the supply chain. A determined actor will always find a path.
792.
by shakna 1y ago
Red the language came along in 2011 - the same year as Witcher II used REDEngine for the first time. So I guess I can see where some confusion can arise. Red is a general programming language, instead of a game engine's personal DSL.
793.
by shakna 1y ago
If your problem is in authorisation, then it will be in your business logic, of what a user looks like, what the hierarchy is, and so on. It shouldn't live in your framework. And the standard ways of doing that, generating single use t
794.
Just in Time Code Generation Within WebAssembly(wingolog.org)
4 points by shakna 1y ago|0 comments
795.
by shakna 1y ago
Yes. Its defined without a technical requirement - just legal ones. Each host will carry a legal responsibility for both what they push, and what they pull.
796.
by shakna 1y ago
Most programs today regularly have bugs with scrolling. Thus, an LLM will produce for you... A buggy piece of code.
797.
by shakna 1y ago
SXML is a fairly old thing, but it isn't really typed. [0] Rather, things are structured, so it's more like a in-memory representation of XML. It doesn't need to be serialised, only deserialised into XML's text syntax. I
798.
by shakna 1y ago
CSRF wasn't really a concern, because we weren't requesting anything from anybody else, and didn't use cookies, etc. But, specifying your own headers is easy, and we had it in a macro we used for our routes. So instead, to ri
799.
by shakna 1y ago
Guile's builtin server is similar: (define (hello-world-handler request request-body) (values '((content-type . (text/plain))) "Hello World!"))
800.
by shakna 1y ago
Don't you just love how marketing has to slap a "AI" paragraph in there? The bigger deal is 200mW for 30Ghz. Which incidentally... Is probably never going to be nice for modern AI.
801.
by shakna 1y ago
> Has a Sinatra-like style route, hence the name "Artanis" ;-)
802.
by shakna 1y ago
I've used this in production once. Mostly able to because Guile's web server is standard, and if you need to bypass the framework, you can rather easily. It's more than fast enough for most people's needs. Flexible, beca
803.
by shakna 1y ago
You made a personal attack. There were better ways of speaking. You've now tried again, to make a personal attack. (I'm so sorry my grammar isn't American. I'm not.) How about, if you really want the conversation, you po
804.
by shakna 1y ago
I'm gonna call you out on this one, sorry. Telling someone who is victim not to be such a victim is... Nothing but being a dick. They're hurting. There's better ways to talk to people. That people don't think of them, is
805.
by shakna 1y ago
Again, Google themselves say it was part of the discussion and where things started. So why do you know better than the Chromium team?
806.
by shakna 1y ago
Probably uses LLVM Flang to make the Fortran parts happen, compiling reference BLAS and LAPACK. As the main dev for WebR is also the one who did this [0]. [0] https://gws.phd/posts/fortran_wasm/
807.
by shakna 1y ago
True, but as someone with a pain condition... Most throwaway suggestions won't help out. People always try to help, but rarely can. That's fine. Take the kindness, discard the advice. But because I've struggled with this thin
808.
by shakna 1y ago
Again, that prior discussion that you're dismissing as irrelevant - is the discussion the Chromium report links to! I don't think that can really get more definitive as cause and effect.
809.
by shakna 1y ago
> brian: we could do that on MDN too. This would be the first time we have something baseline widely available that we've marked as removed. They were advocating for removing it. And it was specific. And is labelled by the Chromium
810.
by shakna 1y ago
The meeting referenced there, from March not last month, also gives no indication that they'd go ahead and make any moves - "stick a pin in it". But they did anyway. [0] panos: next item, removing XSLT. There are usage number

More ›