shaklee3

18 ms·

121.
by shaklee3 3y ago
Do you have a source on that? Consoles are usually loss leader type products and bring more recognition than money. There's a reason the systems are so cheap.
122.
by shaklee3 3y ago
openCL != openGL
123.
by shaklee3 3y ago
Tesla's exapod doesn't and won't exist for the public outside of press releases, for one.
124.
by shaklee3 3y ago
It also doesn't know how to do complex text searches on those, but to each their own.
125.
by shaklee3 3y ago
And their service is infinitely better. It's why all iphone owners I know use Google photos.
126.
by shaklee3 3y ago
Just type lscpu
127.
by shaklee3 3y ago
Nvidia also has nvcomp: https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvcomp
128.
Wikipedia user edits over 90k uses of “comprised of”(en.wikipedia.org)
437 points by shaklee3 3y ago|707 comments
129.
by shaklee3 3y ago
Good point. When you buy an Android phone you're forced to put custom roms and new bootloaders on it. The phones do not work without doing all that.
130.
by shaklee3 3y ago
Induction is better and can be cheaper
131.
by shaklee3 4y ago
this is not true at all. All modern routers use a combination of ASICs and CPUs. some of the data plane even runs through the CPU, depending on the protocol. also, TCP segmentation offload does not mean that the entire TCP protocol is offlo
132.
by shaklee3 4y ago
Yes, most large data centers use bigger frames internally. it's only when you get past the cgnat router that they go back to the compatible sizes.
133.
by shaklee3 4y ago
this article is missing one of the main points for not going much larger. The larger you go, the more data you have to resend on a retransmit. Ethernet doesn't have fragmentation, so you can't simply resend a piece of it. in other
134.
by shaklee3 4y ago
for band limited signals the snr is not increased by oversampling
135.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I think the writing was poor, but also there are some things that are just wrong. Like most of the time people sample at 10x Nyquist. That would be a huge waste of processing given that it doesn't give you any more information about th
136.
by shaklee3 4y ago
seastar uses DPDK, and spdk uses it too. the OP is a maintainer on that.
137.
by shaklee3 4y ago
You'll need a citation for this. I've been using it for years and haven't noticed any difference or outages.
138.
by shaklee3 4y ago
for a lot of gemm sizes 50% is quite good. you'll only hit peak with the exact optimal sizes and/or batches
139.
by shaklee3 4y ago
SpaceX was lucky to get an award for RDOF at all given that when they applied there was virtually no evidence that they could serve what they promised, and the FCC even made a special stipulation for constellations that did not exist/w
140.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I think you are missing/ignoring most of the history of starlink. You can look at my post history to read more if you'd like. Virtually everything starlink had promised from the start has turned out to either be lies or missed the
141.
by shaklee3 4y ago
Please show a link where this was reverse-engineered. I'd be curious to see it.
142.
by shaklee3 4y ago
keep in mind that at the time the FCC allowed them past the first round of RDOF, they did not know the price of the terminal since StarLink wasn't live. part of their complaint was that the user had to buy a $600 terminal with no subsi
143.
by shaklee3 4y ago
Yes, and dvbs-2 also supports very high modulation and code rates. but they're never used in practice since PSD limits don't allow you to transmit that much due to interference on other systems. starlink is not first in line for m
144.
by shaklee3 4y ago
That's the thing, they don't make a lot of money. there was a WSJ article a few years back that showed they absolutely need StarLink to expand that full capacity very early to be profitable. there are not making enough money on la
145.
by shaklee3 4y ago
if this was some kind of stunt pulled by the FCC, SpaceX can sue. but in reality, this was exactly by the book and SpaceX accepted it
146.
by shaklee3 4y ago
this is quite the conspiracy theory. I'm not sure why musk fans say that the FCC is acting egregious here when they are doing the same exact thing they have done for decades. musk fans just don't want the same standards applied to
147.
by shaklee3 4y ago
yes. this is easily verified. they have done many rounds of funding.
148.
by shaklee3 4y ago
the fcc is allowed to take their money back if your service is going in a downward trend. I'm not even sure what you're saying for. they showed that Starlink speeds were degrading significantly over a year. this data is also exact
149.
by shaklee3 4y ago
they have spent an immense amount of money and time on fcc filings for spectrum. this is a mixture of asking for spectrum, proving they're not interfering, and trying to beat kuiper and others to market.
150.
by shaklee3 4y ago
5bps/Hz is way overestimating their spectral efficiency.

More ›