Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shaklee3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
72 ms
·
871.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Wealthfront is great as well. The projections are far better than anything else I've seen.
872.
▲
Why aren’t Japanese-style toilets more popular outside of Japan?
(mobile.twitter.com)
3 points
by
shaklee3
7y ago
|
1 comments
873.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
To be more clear, the unfortunately part was due to the title of this article. I think awk is great, but if you know perl well enough it can easily replace it and be much more versatile
874.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Unfortunately, for large files perl is significantly faster than awk. I was working on some very large files doing some splitting, and perl was over an order of magnitude faster.
875.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Awesome. Thanks!
876.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
I have a really old Nexus 6p. I'm definitely willing to help, but I bet it's just part of having a really old phone.
877.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
This site seems to lock up my phone, but desktop is fine. Anyone else have that issue?
878.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
No questions, but really enjoyed your blog, and your comments on this website over the past few years.
879.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Wikipedia says it's the best selling pinball game of all time. Learn something new every day...
880.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Third time I'm saying this, but starlink is not for consumers. It's not a "cheaper" alternative to your current ISP. None of your comment is based on any of the information put out by SpaceX.
881.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Starlink is not for consumers, so you cannot get it anyways. It's for enterprise at this point.
882.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
What is the SpaceX constellation enabling that others aren't? Hint: theirs is not for consumers.
883.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Sorry to hear that, but hope you find something you like just as much.
884.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
I can't speak for everyone, but ARM processors may be cheaper for some types of workloads. In terms of cores/$, they're cheaper, but some applications would perform far worse on those than on x86. Others just want to use them
885.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Here's the way I see it: there are a lot of customers who don't need all of the AWS services. They also would prefer to be running on bare metal for performance reasons, and to have slightly more control over their application. I
886.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
I believe their pricing model was cheaper than any of the major cloud providers for an equivalent compute and networking resources. Given that their margins are also lower due to the volumes, I wouldn't think that it's obvious tha
887.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
I think the responder was questioning the phrase about packet asking about the customer VMs. You can certainly run VMs on top of bare metal, but packet doesn't know about that.
888.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
It seems they are in the process of open sourcing their deployment software. Does anyone know how this affects that? The github repos are still empty.
889.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
How do you know they're profitable?
890.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Sorry about that. Can you explain the problems using the extender?
891.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Giving someone advice to use Nomad is bad advice as well. As much as it may not be a personal choice, k8s won by a long shot. You just can't rely on Nomad being around in 2 years, but k8s will surely be around.
892.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
You're saying a feature that's in alpha , released 2 months ago is painful? You should at least wait until a feature is beta until expecting it to be easier to use.
893.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
I believe there's only a PDF version, and the author encourages you to print it. It's a monumental effort to make that kind of book, so it's pretty amazing he released it free.
894.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
I feel like every comment here simply read the title, and not even skimmed the book. This is a book about extreme low-level optimizations in concurrency. It's a poor title for this kind of book since it seems like it's a beginner
895.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Parallel programming is not hard if you follow the "just use a mutex and you avoid race conditions" mantra. However, this book dives deep into what mutexes actually do, what the hardware below is doing, and alternatives to a mutex
896.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
I'd suggest this recipe: https://www.seriouseats.com/recipes/2011/10/two-minute-mayon... If you have an immersion blender, it takes literally 2 minutes, and is fool-proof. Doing it other ways, such as ma
897.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Yeah, I suppose that's a valid use case. Things like ixia need to be fpga-based to measure absolute latency without any uncertainty. You cannot currently get that with enough flexibility in commodity cards.
898.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
I believe they are doing 100Gbps now: https://t.co/cbb7NA9vJf?amp=1 It's hard for me to see the use case of an FPGA nic. The reasons outlined above don't seem compelling when a commodity nic like mellanox do so mu
899.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
I think by the definition I was using, data dependency ordering is preserving order on a single thread. All GPUs I'm aware of enforce this.
900.
▲
by
shaklee3
7y ago
Alpha is also unique in that it's the only architecture that doesn't preserve data dependency ordering.
More ›