shaklee3

50 ms·

691.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Satellite internet well above 10M has been available for many years already. This isn't anything new.
692.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Take a look at skaffold. Ours is under 10s
693.
by shaklee3 6y ago
> Must build an image before deploying and it takes time, so deploys are slow (of course we use CI to do it, it's not manual Docker images are extremely fast to build if you use a dockerignore or staging directory properly. Our mult
694.
by shaklee3 6y ago
That entire article is citing the now-defamed prosecuting attorney Ken kratz. He was caught sending inappropriate texts to minors shortly after the show aired, as well as lying/hiding about some evidence from the case. I wouldn't
695.
by shaklee3 6y ago
How are the plotting capabilities of Julia compared to MATLAB?
696.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Intel did go for the tpu market. It was called the nervana chip, and they cancelled it.
697.
by shaklee3 6y ago
The biggest loss for omnisci was the in-memory limits. The highest end GPUs have 32GB, while you can find CPU servers with multiple TB. As soon as you spill out of that you take a big performance hit.
698.
by shaklee3 6y ago
What's your source? Ampere are shipping. AMD has no fab advantage since they have no 7nm enterprise cards. Their entire enterprise line has been somewhat of a joke to date .
699.
by shaklee3 6y ago
This? https://research.google/pubs/pub45226/ AMD already has a cuda to rocm transpiler, but their libraries are so lacking that many things cannot be converted.
700.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Lots of people do. We write cuda all the time.
701.
by shaklee3 6y ago
To be fair, Keller never stays anywhere long
702.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Drop "done" files indicating a large step is done.
703.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Worms 2 was my favorite PC game. I remember the mods with rope games opened a whole new world, and provided endless hours of fun and challenges. Armageddon I remember slowed down the ropes so that wasn't possible anymore. Did they ever
704.
by shaklee3 6y ago
This pocket appears to be identical to the ones in my wife's yoga pants. I thought it was a good idea when I saw it, but it's certainly not original.
705.
by shaklee3 6y ago
There's a reason Matlab is still around and doing well. It's so much faster to prototype things in, and systems engineers all know it well. Yes, python can do most of the same things, but it's nowhere near as easy and integra
706.
by shaklee3 6y ago
That's a claim musk made, but they already have over 500 launched without them. They should have 1000 by year-end, so it's unlikely they'll be able to use them for a couple of years.
707.
by shaklee3 6y ago
They do not have cross-links. They were in the original public announcements, but none of the current satellites have them, nor have they announced when they would be launching some that do. It's likely years away.
708.
by shaklee3 6y ago
I agree. Latency is much less of an issue than most people think. It's mostly about bandwidth.
709.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Possible, yes, practical, no. In general, you want the least complexity as possible in the payload, since you can't fix it as easily as you can with ground bugs. Also, memory that's space-hardened is going to be significantly more
710.
by shaklee3 6y ago
That simulation only takes into account the satellite delay. Fiber delay will be another 20-30ms.
711.
by shaklee3 6y ago
They do for lower tier plans. Not 100G plans.
712.
by shaklee3 6y ago
60:1 is not realistic for a 100G plan. See my other comment.
713.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Yes, I know how the modeling works. For a 100Gbps subscriber they will need to guarantee that they can achieve 100G peak speeds when nobody is using it. That means the beam the user is in always has to be illuminated with as much power as t
714.
by shaklee3 6y ago
They have no cross-links, so up and down to space is going to happen multiple times in many cases. Second, they will not have data centers or ixps right where Google's ingress is, so it has to traverse fiber for quite a while. Someone
715.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Huh? The barrier to entry isn't cheap rocket launches. It's a business plan with the satellite.
716.
by shaklee3 6y ago
This doesn't say how many will be in view at any time. Since this tweet they've had suspected propulsion problems and have filed an amendment to change their orbit to a lower one.
717.
by shaklee3 6y ago
I'm not sure if you're refuting what I said, but there is absolutely no way you will get 20ms end-to-end latency from this. Satellite propagation delay, yes, but for your ping to get to Google and back will be over 50ms.
718.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Starlink will not cost $80 for the gigabit plan. I'd wager there won't be a gigabit plan. They need thousands of customers per 20Gbps satellite for this to even start to make sense. You cannot fit even a couple hundred 1Gbps cus
719.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Starlink won't have higher data caps than other satellite providers. They have at most 20Gbps per satellite, and realistically, much lower. Even with a couple in view that's still far less than the existing HTS satellites.
720.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Musk originally said this would compete with fiber and other terrestrial carriers. That's where the myth about it being lower latency than fiber started out.

More ›