shaklee3

43 ms·

571.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Except what you said is not at all true. Dell, hp, and Lenovo have a whole bunch of different models for different laptops. They're also very customizable, so the model may be slightly different if you want different hardware. But you&
572.
Pattern-Defeating Quicksort(github.com)
1 points by shaklee3 6y ago|0 comments
573.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Right, but OP was listing chat apps to say how many Google killed. Allo was the analogous chat app that was released in tandem with duo. Duo is not a chat app.
574.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Duo isn't a chat app; it's a video app.
575.
by shaklee3 6y ago
SpaceX is not profitable.
576.
by shaklee3 6y ago
What does the dedicated case have to do with starlink? It will be completely oversubscribed once they are out of beta, or they simply don't make money. So the original comment stands in that latency will vary.
577.
by shaklee3 6y ago
That's correct (as I mentioned below). Paying was not a requirement for google music to do that.
578.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Yes, I uploaded the album. Yt music plays a video on any song it has a vevo video for.
579.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Which reality is that? Apple photos is consistently worse at finding them. I've never heard anyone say their image recognition is anywhere near as good, and that's my experience as well.
580.
by shaklee3 6y ago
... And apple can't find cats correctly at all. Which would you want? Google can put a name to your cat and index by typing the name, and in that case it only finds you specific cat.
581.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Which phones?
582.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Thanks for reminding me about another. The desktop version forces you to play videos for songs you've uploaded unless you have a subscription. Waste of bandwidth.
583.
by shaklee3 6y ago
This isn't my experience. Songs I uploaded are not playable without a subscription when the screen is off.
584.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Only with a paid subscription. Google music let you do it without.
585.
by shaklee3 6y ago
It was painless, but the UI for YouTube is awful. Album lists are slower to load, the integration with Google home is worse, and the app doesn't let you play music with your screen off.
586.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Isn't Optional used in a lot of cases where empty means failure?
587.
by shaklee3 6y ago
No. If you have enough inter satellite links, it is almost always better to use those unless there is congestion. It's simple math. You misread my other response. The reason I believe SpaceX will not offer 1G plans, except at a ridicul
588.
by shaklee3 6y ago
The number of satellites has nothing to do with my hard the inter satellite links are. higher bandwidth links are much more expensive and harder to get right (harder meaning never been done at those rates). It's fine that you are in th
589.
by shaklee3 6y ago
The existing satellite providers could provide a 1Gbps plan, but it's not economically feasible. Any of the multiple Gbps communications satellites could do that. SpaceX can also do it, but it's not economically feasible based on
590.
by shaklee3 6y ago
97% success is very bad when the number of satellite is so high that it causes space junk, yes. See here: https://twitter.com/ProfHughLewis/status/1312021242900295688
591.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Sure, the benefits are very clear. But high-frequency inter-satellite links are very difficult. Facebook formed a group to test this early on, and eventually cancelled the project (and are now trying again). It's not just laser comms,
592.
by shaklee3 6y ago
https://planet4589.org/space/stats/megacon/starbad.html
593.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Yup, and Starlink was also going to provide a 1Gbps service with a very low failure rate (now we know both of those aren't true). That article cites no sources, and SpaceX has not publicly said they've successfully tested cross-li
594.
by shaklee3 6y ago
It also makes the big assumption of "when laser links are implemented". There is no timeframe for that, and it's possible that it's never implemented.
595.
by shaklee3 6y ago
I've been using it for several years, and really appreciate it. Thanks!
596.
by shaklee3 6y ago
I'm aware, but the ice lake xeons are starting to ship.
597.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Intel has an fpga+xeon combo, but it's poorly designed and expensive.
598.
by shaklee3 6y ago
Slower, but always faster than dram. So no, there are no downsides.
599.
by shaklee3 6y ago
This is not true anymore: https://travisdowns.github.io/blog/2020/08/19/icl-avx512-fre...
600.
by shaklee3 6y ago
I'm pretty sure CR doesn't let you do that. They don't even allow you to advertise with their name saying they recommended it.

More ›