shad0wfax

12 ms·

61.
by shad0wfax 15y ago
Anybody else thinks Apple is now being the Lodsys? I know they create products unlike Lodsys, but c'mmon, if this isn't a cheap shot, I dont know what else is.
62.
by shad0wfax 15y ago
I agree, its not the same case. The problem might be in 15 years from now, your algorithm might just become a very natural way to solve that specific problem and at that point how your company plays this out matters. My guess is the compani
63.
by shad0wfax 15y ago
What if your competitor came up with the same algorithm (or very similar) and performs as well both in time and space complexity... and all of this on their own, without actually taking a peek at your code. In that case would you go after t
64.
by shad0wfax 15y ago
Sigh, I really wish Apple steps in to weed out such frivolous patents. When should a dev/startup be worried about IP research?
65.
by shad0wfax 15y ago
Agree the Dropship s/w itself was in some violation of the ToS, but was the file that was uploaded to the public dropbox share in violation? What I am trying to separate here is, how could Dropbox the company "determine" the uploaded file i
66.
by shad0wfax 15y ago
wewyar, like kragen & iamjustlooking pointed out I considered that whole episode as strike1. I agree I am being extremely critical and have to agree in spirit that this is their real goof up. Poor security is not a reason to abandon the
67.
by shad0wfax 15y ago
Even I am struggling to understand how exactly did this violate ToS? Was it "illegal code/file"? No! It was a file to a s/w that had the potential to be used maliciously, but the file uploaded itself wasn't, but hadn't really manifested in
68.
by shad0wfax 15y ago
Strike 2, dropbox
69.
by shad0wfax 16y ago
No exercise. How many don't?