Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sgt101
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
66 ms
·
841.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
UK courts work very differently.
842.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
More likely a legal opinion in Google that is waving a shroud of non-compliance and a $200m fine. Result : every exec immediately stops everything until this is clarified. They have to, it's their legal duty and if we are talking Googl
843.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Missing : - statutory watermarking of output - disclosure of training data - under age & vulnerability limitations - limitation of indiscriminate publication
844.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
TBF that's not an option in London, or in apartments. But - other comments have noted, some backup generation capability that use less green resources should be acceptable for such rare contingencies.
845.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
as noted in the article - a once in 12 ish year event. So, 1/4000...
846.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
it claims to run on LaMDA at the moment
847.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
The training sets are so poorly curated we will never know...
848.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
> I remember SCaNN. Are there easy to use implementations available now? Yes, on gcp in vertex AI. GPT4 is talking utter horseshit. https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/docs/matching-engine/ann-...
849.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
But if you wait a month you can get that model for free...
850.
▲
by
sgt101
3y ago
Anyone got a link to "Data Doesn't Do What You Think"?
851.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
The problem is that the models are already evaluating confidence on their answers and picking the best one... And that confidence is based on token generation....
852.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
nahh - poor human generation
853.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
I think most people expect(ed) that performance vs. size would (is) be an s-curve. The surprise for most is that we have climbed up the slopes so far and so fast. What the shape is is not clear to me.
854.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
V.interesting Do any of these studies give a map of programming tasks that are enabled by LLM's vs tasks that don't benefit?
855.
▲
The South Pole Telescope
(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points
by
sgt101
4y ago
|
0 comments
856.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
Yup - I was there. We had a couple of killer apps... "The Personal Travel Assistant" - it booked trips, it managed delays, cancellations, it texted your wife to let her know you would be late.... "The virtual estate agent&quo
857.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
10^16 -> 10^24 flops isn't 100x, it's 100,000,000x This happened in 10 years (training cost of largest model according to the batshit crazy god AI article in the FT). On the one hand compute power increased by about 100x and th
858.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
Yeah - I've never understood this arguement, all the big buildings I've worked in have had electricity, water and sewerage - maybe not plumbed in the dispersed way that you get in residential but available throughout the buildin a
859.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
I wonder if there might be a balancing process here. puts on rose glasses might it be that companies start to buy adequate office space and provision for their workers so as to make life in the office bearable again? I started my career i
860.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
With the lever of chatgpt they can spew more hate more quickly. Like write 100k personalised emails advocating whatever per day quickly. We're all getting ChatGPT approaches from people on Linkedin.... I have a can of gas in the shed,
861.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
Perhaps - but normally you'll have a narrowly defined and very specific technical topic/hypothesis that you're working on, and many/most of these aren't going to be closed off by ChatGPT4 Will this effect the job ma
862.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
I did some work on a project using these last year. My findings were: - couldn't get them onboarded into intune/active directory - camera wasn't good for task past 1.5m or so - screen was too low res for required use (see fea
863.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
I would like to hear that details were provided to independent experimentalists who then replicated the material and demonstrated its properties. This would make me feel very confident.
864.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
My little brain sees this as a reason for failure here. SVB had liquid assets (bonds) that it could sell to meet the demands of the depositors, but those assets fell in value creating losses. The bank was forced to crystalise those losses b
865.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
I have an answer: there is nothing else to invest in for the average person.
866.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
"everyone that counts" There - fixed it.
867.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
yes I agree. I was always told, and believed "a house is for living in, not an investment". It figures in my retirement plans in the sense of not having to pay rent on my house as I will own it. That is really positive because it
868.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
The technical change is that you can build very useful, very small sats, which are cheap. Current SpaceX launch costs are lower, but like 1/2 price and 2x is not a big premium for a national security need.
869.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
Alternatively (if they need a counter) they could launch LEO satellites themselves?
870.
▲
by
sgt101
4y ago
This made me laugh out loud. 1) I support Sizewell c & d. There's already two big reactors there, a third and fourth one make no difference to be fair. 2) I live about 20km from Sizewell. 3) The road that will be choked with traff
More ›