Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sgammon
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
49 ms
·
751.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
Isn’t this normally stored on an encrypted volume anyway? If the user cares about security even in the slightest, they’d be using FileVault, of course So really, this type of encryption is defeating scanning/probing, not a dedicated at
752.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
this is a fantastic take, also, you’re right about server side gRPC web. Java had an experimental implementation that was abandoned. If Google were using gRPC web internally, typescript and Java support would be first class.
753.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
pretty useless as an RPC layer if it imposes language restrictions…
754.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
I am so incredibly excited about this. Buf is an amazing tool that every proto developer should know Great work Buf team
755.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
It’s not censorship; it isn’t muzzling you. Microsoft is choosing not to emit speech on this topic. It is a deliberate and voluntary omission, not censorship.
756.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
I’ll drop you a line :)
757.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
I love this. Could it be embedded for use in other software? Curious as we might have a use case if so.
758.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
i think this is simply Microsoft noticing Nike's embrace of Taking a Stance for the Bottom Line. microsoft is smart enough to realize that NSA tinfoil types already do not trust them, and likely will never trust them (which, if you are
759.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
i'm not sure you want them to write back https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/pull/3958 time to fork
760.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
Bob has clearly not understood the problem https://twitter.com/LeaKissner/status/1488956182798561281
761.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
Lol
762.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
Any planned support for gRPC or OpenAPI?
763.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
so frustrating to need to explain the concept of sexual minorities to Silicon Valley I guess you really did mean “find people like you” as in you the developer?
764.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
you may even have a feature for gay dating but everything on this page is so heteronormative, I wouldn’t be signing up anyway. actual feedback: use graphics that aren’t heavily implying that this is only a platform for strictly male persons
765.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
this is fascinating, thank you for sharing
766.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
low effort and unoriginal
767.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
this article is terrible lmfao
768.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
how is fraud too strong a term? what else would you call deliberate financial malfeasance?
769.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
> Times are different from the carefree days that brought us XML and JSON. no they are not lol
770.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
we do not need special types for UUIDs. why are we doing this to ourselves
771.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
thanks i hate it
772.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
glad to see hn isn’t buying it but retail investors may not be so lucky.
773.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
> I don't get all the bandwagon hate of crypto on this site.. Sure 99% of crypto schemes are b.s and ponzi wish i could frame this quote
774.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
yes but that regulation is based on the root of trust of strong KYC and AML. bitcoin just uses a private key that anyone can generate and use. again by design
775.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
bro, what? check the spam lists?
776.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
> DPRK IT companies and their workers normally engage in a wide range of IT development work of varying complexity and difficulty, such as: > building virtual currency exchange platforms and digital coins, > DPRK IT workers often t
777.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
onlyfans creator? do you mean onlyfans account holder?
778.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
wow what a great way to say you aren't qualified to talk about this
779.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
> because their simply a bad at this you wrote this. about someone else's writing
780.
▲
by
sgammon
4y ago
pardon me, and *why it's still a complete mess. because it undeniably is
More ›