sfn42

19 ms·

151.
by sfn42 4mo ago
You're just expecting too much. If a task takes you 30 seconds to do you're almost certainly better off doing it yourself than getting an LLM to do it. If it's a recurring task it might make sense to create a skill for it, an
152.
by sfn42 5mo ago
That's why I said "a lot of the time". Not always. And it's not really a problem to de-DRY things, literally just copy/paste and make the change you want. The bigger problem in my eyes is when the requirements star
153.
by sfn42 5mo ago
I don't know why people always need to assign agendas to me in discussions like this. It's not "important to me" it's literally just reality. Consciousness is mysterious, we don't know much about it. The fact
154.
by sfn42 5mo ago
> Least important thing for a business - Takes weeks or months to get simple features out the door, and when they're out they're buggy as hell and the bugs never get fixed. Sound familiar? > I’d never touch any line of code
155.
by sfn42 5mo ago
I agree, exact simulation is nonsensical which is my whole point. Did you read the comment I replied to? It is nonsensical to claim that anything other than my brain could produce the same consciousness that my brain is producing. It's
156.
by sfn42 5mo ago
How can a simulation be human when it isn't human? It's a simulation. A human is a human, a simulation is not. Anything that is not a human, is not a human and can never be a human. And there absolutely is something essential to t
157.
by sfn42 5mo ago
I have full control of my codebase. I'm not afraid to make changes to it because I know what I'm doing. You would edit Claude.md to say things like what tech the project is using, because that's the entire point of claude.md.
158.
by sfn42 5mo ago
Citation needed. Also that's impossible. It is impossible to simulate reality exactly using digital computers. The best we can do is approximate. Doesn't matter how powerful it gets, it'll always just be an approximation.
159.
by sfn42 5mo ago
Its a computer program. It is literally just a lot of zeroes and ones, sitting there doing nothing. Then a request comes in, and the system does a bunch of calculations using those bits, and spits out a result. The bits are unchanged. When
160.
by sfn42 5mo ago
Right? It's a computer program. Of course it isn't conscious.
161.
by sfn42 5mo ago
The author is saying the .NET devs did a bad job implementing that, they are not saying you shouldn't use it. So you talking about using attributes is irrelevant to the article, it has nothing to do with developers using attributes nor
162.
by sfn42 5mo ago
Have you tried adding this information to claude.md so it knows? I also think your excuse is bad. "The code is legacy fucked so I'll just legacy fuck it some more because I can't be bothered to make an effort"
163.
by sfn42 5mo ago
A lot of the time if you're copying code from one place to another what you actually want to do is abstract it so you can reuse it in both places. The LLM can easily do this type of stuff, just tell it and it'll happily do it. Thi
164.
by sfn42 5mo ago
US in a nutshell
165.
by sfn42 5mo ago
It seems you didn't read the article. It's not whining about how people use or write custom attributes. It's whining about how they're implemented in the language. And I wouldn't really describe it as whining, I tho
166.
by sfn42 5mo ago
What's stupid in my opinion is this idea that the LLM can't be used to write good code. Like you use it for throwaway code. I use LLMs heavily, bit it doesn't diminish the quality of my code at all. If anything it raises the
167.
by sfn42 5mo ago
I have 50 agents watching blurays for me 24/7
168.
by sfn42 5mo ago
Some people manage to go through the whole education system without learning much, others go through exactly the same program and learn a ton, way more than required. Guess which of those people say education is a waste of time. Basic Educa
169.
by sfn42 5mo ago
Another reason it's irrelevant is you just don't need the accel. Flooring a Tesla is fun once or twice, but if you floor it every chance you get I don't want to be your passenger. It's neither comfortable nor safe.
170.
by sfn42 5mo ago
Welcome to literally all industry.
171.
by sfn42 6mo ago
Hasn't happened yet.
172.
by sfn42 6mo ago
Unless the pay is crap I'm sure lots of people would be interested.
173.
by sfn42 6mo ago
The company isn't donating anything. They're doing the opposite, taking a significant chunk of people's donations.
174.
by sfn42 6mo ago
I take both. 500-1000mg acetaminophen, 200-400mg ibuprofen. Usually helps for headaches which I get frequently. I only take them for the worst headaches though, so probably once every couple of weeks on average.
175.
by sfn42 6mo ago
The third party is working with the charity(or ngo or whatever). The charity is essentially paying them for marketing, using a huge chunk of the money people think they're giving to charity. The charity is complicit in this deception,
176.
by sfn42 6mo ago
I was approached on the street by a girl working for a marketing company, wanting me to start a subscription for $20 a month to Save the Children which I think is a pretty well regarded charity. We hit it off and met up later and I asked he
177.
by sfn42 6mo ago
Or - making sensational statements gets attention. A dangerous tool is necessarily a powerful tool, so that statement is pretty much exactly what you'd say if you wanted to generate hype, make people excited and curious about your myst
178.
by sfn42 6mo ago
That's my point. Person above is like "if I had a million Claudes I'd be Rick Sanchez", I'm saying they can do that right now so go ahead.
179.
by sfn42 6mo ago
Some people just choose to ignore reality..
180.
by sfn42 6mo ago
There's nothing (except their capacity and your token budget I guess) stopping anyone from having a million simultaneous conversations with Claude right now. Maybe a million is a stretch but thousands is completely doable right now. Th

More ›