sfe22

14 ms·

121.
by sfe22 4y ago
Thats also fine, especially if priced drop more. But even in a sane economy I would expect most would get raises as they work faster and better, even as prices fall.
122.
by sfe22 4y ago
Felt off, but went with it. Looks like I made a new friend too xD.
123.
by sfe22 4y ago
Yeah, but not any economy, to be a nightmare requires a nightmarish economy.
124.
by sfe22 4y ago
Yeah, but guess who encourages debt.
125.
by sfe22 4y ago
Deflation being much much worse is a nice joke. You telling me that if gas and food and rent lowered in price over time, I will be worse off? Stuff are supposed to become cheaper as technology advances yet we only either get high or low pri
126.
by sfe22 4y ago
Zero percent or negative just means people involuntary pay by inflation. There is not free lunch (someone had to work to make it)
127.
by sfe22 4y ago
I am ok with unionization (even though it is price fixing, which is ultimately not a good thing to see), as long as noone is forced into that scheme.
128.
by sfe22 4y ago
If you don’t like that manifestation, you can work for another company that does not do it, or start your own. We are still a freeish market fortunately. So we’ll get to know which one is better thankfully soon.
129.
by sfe22 4y ago
Sure thing. You are just as welcome.
130.
by sfe22 4y ago
Yeah that’s why i said believe in. Whether you tend to believe if fewer is better, or more is better. To me it seemed like you belong to the former, and thats why i made a specific question which you are actively avoiding answering.
131.
by sfe22 4y ago
I have no problem with that. My response was in his statement that he does not believe in free markets.
132.
by sfe22 4y ago
You said you are far from being fan of capitalism. Free market means as many companies as needed. The opposite is one company only controlling everything, most commonly irl in form of communism.
133.
by sfe22 4y ago
You somehow believe that having only one corporation will yield better results for the society, instead of many companies competing in a free market? (Where you can also compete if you think your better)
134.
by sfe22 4y ago
Yes, if the people want to use their notes. We also suggest getting rid of kings and communist party for decentralized democracies.
135.
by sfe22 4y ago
Right, looks like we have a bigger problem to fix before looking into the carbon problem.
136.
by sfe22 4y ago
Maybe we do indeed need that tax. My only request would be the decision to be democratic and making sure the revenue doesn’t go to to the monopoly that injected people with plutonium. Instead it can be used to reverse the damage and with an
137.
by sfe22 4y ago
It mentions “by the people” however the roles and the power exists without people’s continued consent, which makes the words worthless.
138.
by sfe22 4y ago
You make the weird assumption that any law requires a big monopoly that meddles in everything. Not true. Anti-slavery law covers the ability to discharge with bankruptcy.
139.
by sfe22 4y ago
That is just in popular culture. In theory and reality, there in no need for your or any other American’s blessing for the feds, congress, president or even judges to exist and have power.
140.
by sfe22 4y ago
Interest rates should depend on the market. Why you want to artificially meddle in everything? Solutions for student loans is simple. Stop government guarantees, and get rid of the government law that makes it not dischargeable. Government
141.
by sfe22 4y ago
It’s just the v2 take on the crypto hype. There is no real need for 99.9% of the crypto yet they got value.
142.
by sfe22 4y ago
Good definition. But we are not a free market country, so you gotta play by the current rules.
143.
by sfe22 4y ago
You can be libertarian and accept government subsidies. It’s not like he could have kept the recent $11B if he did not accept the subsidies. If he believes in libertarianism and would pick freedom over oppression given the choice, then he i
144.
by sfe22 4y ago
Maybe they are a “monopoly” because of the cheap and good services they provide. The only bad monopolies are the ones using violence to hold on to it. Examples include mafia, terrorists, talibans, governments etc.
145.
by sfe22 4y ago
Yep, and the government enables and facilitates this malicious action for all statists that wonder what regulation could fix it.
146.
by sfe22 5y ago
As long as we have automatic rulers (countries with automatically powerful government) corruption will be there. Basically corruption is profitable so that is why it happens. If we had democracy, it will go down significantly, because is is
147.
by sfe22 5y ago
But bitcoin can be mixed, how do you decide which of the next transactions contain your part of stolen bitcoins?
148.
by sfe22 5y ago
While I am confident prospective communist leaders are malicious, and want more easy power/wealth for themselves, without caring about the damage to everyone else, I apologize for trying to compare you to them this early in the convers
149.
by sfe22 5y ago
In a free market an entity has to be efficient to survive and especially make a profit. There are plenty of ways they can do it, creating more housing, better conditions, extras etc. and other things potential customers may value and choose
150.
by sfe22 5y ago
Why is someone being more efficient than alternative and making a profit a bad thing? Besides you are free to create a non profit housing company, if you truly believe in what you preach. And you will have an edge with prospective customers

More ›