Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
seventytwo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
91.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Unless it’s 1 bit per 100ms?
92.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
…duh? I thought this was common knowledge.
93.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
What’s the read and write speed?
94.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Are we the same person?
95.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Problem? No. It’s a feature.
96.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
I subscribe to Kagi, and it’s great.
97.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Well, we’ve been of the collective mindset that internationalizing supply chains is best, for multiple reasons. And, under the right conditions, that may be true. However, the world is becoming morr multi-polar, so the calculations are chan
98.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
No… we can (relatively) accurately date things using many different methods. There’s no need to cast broad suspicion on scientific methods.
99.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
If it’s not TSMC, it’s bad?
100.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
A geo-strategic win for securing the semiconductor supply chain, and the top parent comments in here are complaints about the parking lot and how much tax money it’s going to take. Sheesh.
101.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Huberman seems to be well-respected, but I just can’t shake my feeling that he’s constantly trying to sell me stuff.
102.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
It’s only coincidental that companies work in the interest of consumers. Profit is the only real incentive. Often times, the profit and consumer benefit are aligned, but it’s because of feedback systems like public reputation, product usefu
103.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Why doesn’t the company boardroom just make all the decisions for the company, down to the brand of bulk toilet paper that’s going to be used at the remote branch? Figure that out, and then you’ll figure out why Congress doesn’t just make a
104.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
The larger question about Chevron doctrine is really the issue. SCOTUS gutting Chevron will cripple the ability of the market to be regulated. You think companies charging fees is bad now? Just wait… you think you’ve seen OSHA violations no
105.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Well, well, well… its seems we’ve come full circle.
106.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
That’s what they did
107.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
No Apple Watch? Cmon. That’s gotta be the most common one out there.
108.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
An alien visitation would be THE single most significant event to ever happen to humanity. The idea that it would be able to be kept secret is ridiculous.
109.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Big “if”.
110.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
It’s both. But it’s ultimately the profit motive that drives a business at all.
111.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Blast from the past that one is
112.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
The research, development, approval process, and production all absolutely cost money that needs to be recouped from the sale, but we shouldn’t ever forget the reason why the company exists: to make profit.
113.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
I’m fond of the idea that capitalism is like fire. You can use it as a tool and for cooking and warmth, but it must be regulated lest it get out of control and consume everything it touches.
114.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Price absolutely still exists in government run health care… do you have any idea how it actually works in developed countries?
115.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Very cool!
116.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
I was just gonna say, there’s probably single CFD simulation files that are larger than 45GB.
117.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Have to associate a cost to this or it’s never going to get fixed. Every bit of pollution put out into the environment should come with a price. You want to emit X tons of pollution? Ok. Pay Y dollars to the government.
118.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
It only needs to be as safe as fossil fuels, or even slightly less safe, if the benefits are higher. This always bothers me. People freak out about LiIon battery failures, or hydrogen, or ammonia, or nuclear power. But here we are with an e
119.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
I get why some people are trying to stick to the 1.5C thing, but it’s the role of scientists to just give it to us straight. We rely on that. Additionally, I think it is actually better that they express the situation as-is (getting worse,
120.
▲
by
seventytwo
3y ago
Does this technique only work with systems that are edge-on so that the star light passes through the exoplanet atmosphere? Or can this work with reflected star light for systems that have orbits that face us?
More ›