seppin

29 ms·

151.
by seppin 6y ago
"Ex-Hunter Biden associate's records don't show proof of Biden business relationship amid unanswered questions" https://i.imgur.com/5O6iRyh.png You. Aren't. Fooling. Anyone.
152.
by seppin 6y ago
So Russian intelligence hacks Burisma the exact same way they hacked the DNC, leaking emails to smear the democratic candidate in the exact same way, and your response is "there's no direct evidence to tie them together!" You
153.
by seppin 6y ago
> I don't know what all is in those emails, but Bobulinski certainly does >non-partisan actor I just saw that guy sit with Tucker Carlson for an hour and claim he has "Q level clearance". The dude is a hapless boomer QA
154.
by seppin 6y ago
> West's consumer industrial base. Not the military industrial complex Imagine thinking those are two separate things.
155.
by seppin 6y ago
Glad you are having fun backing up other people that are wrong too.
156.
by seppin 6y ago
That's because you think a raw intelligence dossier complied by a top professional is the same thing as an ABSURD laptop story created to launder Russian military-hacked emails for political purposes in order to be 2020's equival
157.
by seppin 6y ago
Metadata is data.
158.
by seppin 6y ago
> Yes, that is journalism. No that's the active measures of a spy agency.
159.
by seppin 6y ago
> One gets the impression his claim that all the CIA's successes are secret is a lie. Because there never were any Who do you think fought and won the cold war, Seal Team Six?
160.
by seppin 6y ago
> and at least one claim was ruled innacurate/misleading in court As said, not disproven. > One of the main sources was also identified as a potential national security risk The self-id'd source (Steele never confirmed) of m
161.
by seppin 6y ago
> no clear evidence Just say "no evidence". > (though the "big guy" phrasing refering to Joe was not proved one way or the other). Pizzagate all over again. "As long as some words mean other words than we have
162.
by seppin 6y ago
> Trump wasn't a topic here until you brought him up. Are you joking? Do you think any of us even know who Hunter Biden is if it's not for the dirty efforts of the Trump campaign to drag him through the mud?
163.
by seppin 6y ago
> There is no evidence to tie that hack to this leak. Russian Intel hacked Burisma's emails, those same emails are now part of a public smear campaign. THEY ARE THE SAME EMAILS. What you meant to say is "there is no evidence th
164.
by seppin 6y ago
> He has his own document, emails, etc. He very much does not, you just invented that. > Lot's of people, including Glen Greenwald and Matt Taibbi What a joke.
165.
by seppin 6y ago
> abuse the information for private gains What do you think intelligence is?
166.
by seppin 6y ago
The emails came from a Russian GRU hack last year https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/13/us/politics/russian-hacke... The photos most likely from an iCloud hack. The FBI has not made ANY claims on the c
167.
by seppin 6y ago
> I can't speak for Giuliani, and I agree that his involvement in this is strange, but NYP, Daily Caller, and National Pulse have all offered to share the contents of the drive with other journalists. I don't know to what exten
168.
by seppin 6y ago
"Trump commits crimes". "Yeah but what happens if Biden commits theoretical crimes in the future? What then?" Great point.
169.
by seppin 6y ago
> It's undisputed that Hunter was getting 600k from a ukrainian national gas company It's unsubstantiated, at best: "However, the Daily Caller News Foundation could not confirm the accuracy of this figure, as there is no e
170.
by seppin 6y ago
Because getting a sweetheart deal b/c your dad was VP and money laundering / theft / bribery are not two sides of the same coin. One sucks but occurs everywhere, the other is illegal.
171.
by seppin 6y ago
Right, as said no evidence.
172.
by seppin 6y ago
> How can anyone still be this naive? Protecting their worldview depends on it.
173.
by seppin 6y ago
Right, the DNC's emails weren't fake either. They were stolen by a state and leaked via a third party for political reasons. That's the game.
174.
by seppin 6y ago
> the Hunter Biden laptop / Bobulinski testimony. The WSJ, while their own op-ed page was trying to make the story real, thoroughly broke down and discredited all aspects of this story. There is no tie to Joe Biden at all. Why are y
175.
by seppin 6y ago
I always compare talking to a Trump supporter about his crimes to talking to a Pats fan about Bill Belichick or Brady getting caught cheating red-handed. Not only do they not care, they are confused as to why they should care. It's the
176.
by seppin 6y ago
To be clear, giuliani has refused to give the contents to anyone in the press. The Daily Caller (an extension of the Trump campaign) isn't to be trusted. No rational person would expect this to prove anything. Also, Hunter's email
177.
by seppin 6y ago
Yes accuse Biden of corruption so Trump's corruption just doesn't bite as hard, and be maybe sneaks a few more votes. This is a cynical game and I'm sick of so many people playing it willingly.
178.
by seppin 6y ago
> youre entitled to your opinion you are entitled to say you believe something with no evidence, and he's entitled to say that's a ridiculous thing to do. > can you please let me know why the WSJ says there is no connection
179.
by seppin 6y ago
What he meant to say was: "the FBI has confirmed there is a laptop". They have no commented at all about what's on it, only to say that these emails and salacious photos were being shopped around Ukraine last year and were mo
180.
by seppin 6y ago
"Everything is shit and everyone is guilty" is the exact thing an autocrat needs the majority of his citizens to believe to remain in power.

More ›