Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
seppin
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
91.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
I would respectfully disagree with your premise that there is such a thing as "smart". Ie. if you can do one thing well that requires a specific skillset, you can do another thing well too. That's why Elon Musk got asked abou
92.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
I mean a home with local ties and roots, not just someone else's airbnb :)
93.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
If you are implying those attributes are unique to coders, or that all coders have them, i'd have to politely disagree with both points. Coding might imply a capacity to do other complex jobs, but not to become an expert in said fiel
94.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
I wish there was a cal sync different from mail and the rest. Having to login to a secure device to check meetings for the next morning in an annoying ritual.
95.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
Right but actual roots / connection to a local community, besides fellow travelers / tourists? I personally never felt more than a temporary resident in most places i've been.
96.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
Ah ok you are married. Do you have long term friends locally ? Is your wife your anchor to a local community ?
97.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
They can code, yet many remain painfully ignorant about people and the world.
98.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
They have one specific ability, which doesn't require much math at all. Death to the halo effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect
99.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
vanlife, digital nomad, etc. It's all the same. You are only presented with the highs, not the lows.
100.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
> I’ve been nomading for ten years. The most i've ever been able to do was half a year. How can you choose to be without a real home that long?
101.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
> If I'm sending things out that my reports can't or don't want to read, If you have to ask..
102.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
They are bad managers that work at bad companies, then.
103.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
But it's rare and usually conditional. Large sections of the US IC still haven't forgiven Israel for Pollard.
104.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
Is this proven with Teams?
105.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
No, I admitted my original comment didn't cover everything it needed to, hoping such a concession would lead to a more civilized discussion. I was wrong, you are more interested in attacking people and defending yourself than discussin
106.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
> Part of a protection racket is staging attacks when you think you're not going to get paid Are you implying this has happened or does happen? Please cite your source if so. > Just because it's a protection racket doesn
107.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
> Have you ever seen a gangster film? I'm sorry i'm not basing my arguments on movies i've seen. Combine that with you arrogance in implying i'm getting concepts wrong (i'm citing them, you are not), I think this
108.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
> it has been structured so as to help fascistic, autocratic governments gain and hold power. Perhaps during the cold war, but "countering communism" (whatever that means) was the mission of every branch of the US Government th
109.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
My point was a simple one, spying will always occur. If people are arguing it should be the exclusive purview of autocrats, and that would somehow improve the state of the world, I would disagree.
110.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
You're right: "Through the credible threat of violence, the racketeers deter people from swindling, robbing, injuring, sabotaging or otherwise harming their clients." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protect
111.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
Shutting down spy agencies in democracies will not stop spying done by autocrats. If anything, it will create greater incentives to attack more, not less.
112.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
A protection racket implies the "threat" is fake or choreographed. Are you implying China isn't hacking America, or pushing out it's maritime borders, or threatening US allies? These are all engineered threats somehow?
113.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
..unless you are China
114.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
> HUMINT Intel isn't practiced between staunch allies either It most certainly is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Pollard
115.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
Interesting news today, Israel remains the only country on earth capable of freeing a spy in the USA convicted and serving a life sentence. https://www.jns.org/us-frees-jonathan-pollard-after-decades-... A complicated relat
116.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
I'm not saying there isn't use for knowing your adversary's capabilities (especially in designing your own offense/defensive systems) but very little of that knowledge informs the core of future arms programs.
117.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
> The only people who care about "truth" in capitalism are shareholders and affluent individuals. These are the people that care about stability, in order to enjoy their wealth. A country that cannot agree with one another on o
118.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
"is believed by many" He already said no.
119.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
Israel gladly accepts all the help it can from the US, but is well aware of the large support that American anti-zionist and pro-palestinian causes receive. They also don't trust certain administrations to always have their back, even
120.
▲
by
seppin
6y ago
> What they do mind is when they themselves are being spied upon That's what SIGINT is. > Like Merkel's phone being tapped. Which is an example of SIGINT. And it was leaked which is why it became an issue. World leader'
More ›