Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
seph-reed
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
91.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
I'll talk to my friends about "my day" every once in a while. Invariably it involves programming and the act of trying to describe what I'm doing is like off-roading: you constantly have to go long ways around things to
92.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
> I can also say that the same is true for all progress the world has seen Science, art, and creation all tend to be rich with ambiguity and uncertainty. Most of the time, people hope they can do a thing and stick to it through many ups
93.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
> The fundamental problem. You lost me. If some context was in there (as in "the current fundamental problem on my known platforms"), then everything else you said would follow. But there must be a way to do better. I can p
94.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
This is a very interesting question. Almost like saying: how do we keep gravity from eventually creating a few giant blackholes? Granted, we can't change physical laws. But if we could, we would clearly need some sort of anti-gravity
95.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
I really, really wish there were spaces that required some sort of proof of critical thinking to enter. The harder the test to get in, the better. Maybe even a non-refundable 50+$ fee. I would give a lot to have a single space on Earth wh
96.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
Much the opposite. Yours is the belief which every war has been fought over: the belief that you know what's good and bad, or right and wrong. I am in no way saying we shouldn't pursue it, or do our best. But simply admitting th
97.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
But compare that to someone who has no critical thinking skills at all. Further, at least some people will be clever enough to use critical thinking on their own beliefs. Maybe some will only use it to further entrench, but not all. And
98.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
> I can know that all the carbon we dump in the air and the general carelessness with which we treat the planet on a large scale are extremely detrimental to our civilisational wellbeing. You really, really, really can not. For all you
99.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
Hopefully, anyone who had taken even introductory critical-thinking would recognize what was going on there and throw the article out. If the worry is, "this is one more way to convince non-critical people of things," I'm pre
100.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
For the sake of not being an over-confident, fledgeling sentience ape; the complexity involved in the question of "is this good or bad" are absolutely, overwhelmingly complex. ---------- If you wanted to truly answer such a questi
101.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
That's a good thing. Having a giant political flamewar about how critical thinking should work has good potential to result in mutual destruction. If you really play it out in your head, critical thinking is pretty hard to abuse becaus
102.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
What if -- and I know this is a crazy idea -- but what if there was some sort of metric beyond popularity by which things were reported? Maybe even decided? For instance: if there was a free online study (in person test) "critical thi
103.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
Do you ever feel the impulse to "ctrl-f" when you're at the grocery store? Imagine the feeling of going to reach for something, and accidentally just envisioning moving your arm. Might be like "stepping into air" w
104.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
Really, really like it. My one thought so far: - it would be nice to not have to use Google for search.
105.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
I'm glad someone else feels it. I gave it a shot, and once I got the algorithm to recognize me... it was addictive, but fake as fuck. Nothing really felt like it had love in it. And as much as I tried to push the algorithm towards ed
106.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
The "minority status" stuff seems fine in the grand scheme of adult world... people are fairly predictable passed a certain age (based off generation/origin). The generalizations obviously punch down on people who never real
107.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
This is a toughy. People who don't believe in covid vaccines -- for instance -- are living in a world of anecdotes, untrusting of easily manipulable data. But it's where we're at. In a world where you can't trust the da
108.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
A better title might be: > Staggering US wealth inequality heaps long-term harm on to low-income children, minorities most affected It would say everything there is to say without throwing non-minority low-income children under the bus.
109.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
I switched over to ElementaryOS for my movie/music/games/3d-modeling/video-editing/daw machine a bit ago. It's pretty, and it (mostly) "just works." I legitimately believe this project is on its way
110.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
As a competent developer of user interfaces, I'd consider working for Microsoft career suicide. It would look bad on my resume. And given how much of a mess it is, it sounds like a terribly stressful job. I think any dev who doesn&#x
111.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
They show this cycle infographic in the article: https://profectusmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/tabrrok5... I think one very, very crucial but taken for granted aspect of this cycle is "Natural
112.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
In my case, you basically just take some code like this: const renderEl = flex("UserList", [ label("User", ["Alice"]), label("User", ["Bob"]), ]); In NativeScript, y
113.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
I'm a solo developer, and I have a project that totally can do it. I've done the proof-of-concept in an afternoon, but am mostly focused on web stuff atm. Granted, it leverages NativeScript, but it's really not that hard onc
114.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
Is there a photo of what he's talking about anywhere?
115.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
> you could reasonably expect to create a confusing enough (though not identical) NFT with an earlier timestamp The timestamp is the block-chain, not what's written on the document. > Yes, but as a buyer, how do I know the differ
116.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
> Then there would be two NFTs with the exact same "proof" in them. Which is the real one? The one that came first. Are you really that invested in claiming knowledge on this subject? If so, how could you not immediately grok
117.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
if you hike more than 6 miles from any given trail-head, there will still be people but they usually aren't the kind to have their phone out. if you start from a place without reception, doubly so.
118.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
> NFTs can't embed proof that they were created by anyone NFT's aren inherent proof, but they can embed proof (if it exists). If I took a photo of an idable, signed and noterized document stating that "the owner of X NFT
119.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
NFT's really confuse me. Take the Mona Lisa for example: if the Louvre were ever to make their own NFT (perhaps with some embedded proof it was them creating it), wouldn't the "stolen" one suddenly lose all value? I get
120.
▲
by
seph-reed
5y ago
I think the people this effects the worst are those who don't subscribe to either party, or the idea of a "one-dimensional political spectrum" in general. The dominating political "sides" are full on ideologies at t
More ›