seoulmetro

10 ms·

31.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Locale-based subreddits are some of the worst sub-reddits available. You mean places like /r/korea, /r/australia, /r/melbourne etc. right? They are the bottom of the barrel and the biggest wasted spaces due to
32.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
No. Censorship is the decision to remove. Moderation is the deduction to remove. Hackernews is censored fairly strongly, and moderated "ok".
33.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Shadowban everyone and everything. Use moderators to instil a regime of discourse that puts certain concepts on a unjust pedestal. Use people who agree with the message as missionaries and AI/fake posts as fuel. Sell this as a function
34.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
These aren't anti toxicity features. They're censorship tools. It's quite hard to make anti-toxicity features and I'd love to see some real ones. These aren't them.
35.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
It's due to them choosing to make it like this. Why does this come up so much? Yes... Google, Facebook, Instagram, they're all hamstringing their experience to spite you. They benefit and you lose.
36.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Your entire comment just speaks about poor practices, not about abuse of outside hours. There is never going to be a law that restricts wasted productivity or bad decisions. Most workers in Australia don't even have ways to remote in.
37.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Yeah, when you're a ruthless G. Not when you get home and start making up comebacks like George Costanza. No one thinks scrounging around for money is going to label you a ruthless G.
38.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
"Mark Zuckerberg says 'we had no choice to do that thing we always do, honestly guys', please don't think I'm not cool." Zuck, you can't be cool, you're too powerful and have done too many terrible th
39.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Australia doesn't have a problem with people doing work outside work hours... not even close. That's why this was so easy to pass. That's not to say that there will never be exceptions against the laws.
40.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
>One cannot legally run a hosted, unmoderated content platform in the developed world, one will always be required to remove illegal materials and turn over materials in cooperation with law enforcement. One can. I think you're conf
41.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
There are a set of words you can't utter on these sites or your content gets removed. That's not moderation, that's censorship. And they love that it's not actual moderation.
42.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Your mistake is assuming Facebook's algorithm isn't written to be exactly like you explained. "The algorithm is poor" is not a thing anymore, algorithms are easy to get right and even easier to break on purpose for their
43.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
No, do you seriously not know what traditional mother roles do (and can do now)? Dads don't only work either.
44.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Yep. "Web experience" made me think there was an actual website experience. There still isn't a web experience and it's still not open to everyone. lol
45.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Because large, money-rich companies and censored usage is not a proving ground. Amazon "trialled" stores that were automated but ended up being humans. Even without the human factor they weren't proof of successful automation
46.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Ah so essentially the reverse perspective at a relief on single income earners. Yep! There needs to be more done, but the biggest reason dual incomes work are for paying bills and luxuries.
47.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Single income earning households provided the children with access to their parents, and provided each parent with more free time to pursue their recreational "career". The father spent more time with colleagues or friends after w
48.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Mothers were at home way before 1950s. >Single income households have never been the norm. ??? Yes they have. The children worked for the family but if there were any kids or birthing going on, which there usually was, the mother stayed
49.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Nah. We're still not that close. Think of it this way, you turn on an appliance at home and it's what, a 0.0001% chance it will explode in your face? Now automated driving, hospitality etc is all more like a 0.1+% chance something
50.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
What's the next big step? What will it do? Why do we need or want it? Surely you have the answer. This means you are sure we are close to automated driving, engineering and hospitality?
51.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
>That's basically already the case because of progressive tax brackets. Progressive tax brackets work against single income families? Do you mean combined tax declaring? I know the US is different to most of the world. But in most o
52.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
I think the one underlying problem society faces that would absolutely improve our lives in every way is to go back to the 1 income household model, but still maintain the possibility of dual income households. (don't force the other n
53.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
It's not about walkable or not. It's about cost. It's just that people started wanting (or were forced to) save their money on more important things at home while also working much more (two person income households are the n
54.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
People don't become accomplished because it's easier. They become accomplished because they did hard things. All their work is very lack lustre.
55.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Laptop class? You mean like the fresh outdoors class (labourers)? There's no hat benefit indoors.. Let's not let them wear hats outdoors as they already enjoy an extremely high quality of life. This is all I hear.
56.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
They aren't. They're also an entire team.
57.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
This is their way around non-convertable interaction. They don't want PCs because PCs won't use the idea properly. They hide it behind the idea of a laptop in traffic which is disingenuous but oh well. Probably saves them a lot of
58.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
Yes, software to lazily censor can help you guys if you are too lazy to classify what to censor. It doesn't help much though as it decreases the overall quality of the site in exchange for potential moderation threshold decreases. Like
59.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
No, it's a form of lazy censorship. Having moderators that do proper jobs is an attempt to not have the site be dominated by flamewars.
60.
by seoulmetro 2y ago
It's a form of lazy censorship.

More ›