seoaeu

75 ms·

961.
by seoaeu 6y ago
You just have to phrase them differently: Argument 1) I didn't do what you're accusing me of, or Argument 2) What you're accusing me of isn't illegal If you can establish the second one, I don't see why you wouldn&#
962.
by seoaeu 6y ago
Ah, I parsed your statement as NOT (white OR male) rather than (NOT white) OR (NOT male). The former being roughly 35% and the latter 85% of the population
963.
by seoaeu 6y ago
That works out to 35%. We seem to be in agreement?
964.
by seoaeu 6y ago
> unless you aren't white or male. Kind of says something when this is seen as an exceptional case, given that a significant majority of people aren't white men...
965.
by seoaeu 6y ago
Others profiting at the expense of the authors is not a desired feature. A necessary consequence of the current OSS regime perhaps, but not desired. The definitions written down decades ago don't have to be the final say. I chose the e
966.
by seoaeu 6y ago
But for all they know perhaps you want to purchase one for your daughter now or a second one for a dual-monitor setup. Ads in general have a very low success rate, so it can be worth doing even if the guess is wrong a very large percent of
967.
by seoaeu 6y ago
Are the "things I just purchased" suggestions actually bad though? I see people complain about them a lot, but I haven't seen anyone chime in with what the conversion rate is on them compared to other targeting strategies. Li
968.
by seoaeu 6y ago
What this article misses is the presence of bad faith actors who make billions from open source but studiously work to prevent even a small amount of that flowing back to the companies that wrote the software. Kind of like the difference be
969.
by seoaeu 6y ago
Image compression will get you way further, but even then you'd probably need 10x the space for anything remotely reasonable
970.
by seoaeu 6y ago
This is basically what we already do, and it works fine. But opponents will still pester you about where to put the sealed boxes :P
971.
by seoaeu 6y ago
I've seen this sort of thing all the time. Not the part about different preprocessor defines in different files, but about having a struct's contents depend on some compile time conditions. It comes up when you want to track extra
972.
by seoaeu 6y ago
Nothing looks necessarily wrong to me but there are some elements that aren't exactly how this code would normally be written. Like that they don't take advantage of Iterator::enumerate() which makes the the for loop more awkward
973.
by seoaeu 6y ago
I'm struggling to think of any situation in which someone would actually want to be reported to the FBI. Doesn't mean that reporting them isn't the right thing to do.
974.
by seoaeu 6y ago
There's a balance though. You might have more power if you're perceived as neutral, but actually using power is inherently non-neutral
975.
by seoaeu 6y ago
You don't need the rules to know that sharing information from internal sites might be prohibited. You need them to be able to prove that sharing information like this would get somebody fired . The other possibility (which the NLRB s
976.
by seoaeu 6y ago
> Richard Ortiz was fired after the incident , but because Tesla did not have standing rules against browsing employees' profiles on Workday or screenshotting them , apparently that's not allowed. The real question is if they&#