semiquaver

5 ms·

31.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
Who’s making easy jokes about biological weapons?
32.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
This looks unambiguous to me: > Forgejo does not accept works of authorship (code, documentation, etc.) either partially or completely generated by AI due to legal uncertainties.
33.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
In case anyone from X is reading this, please fix your “open in app” nag screen. For several weeks now, clicking it in iOS opens the App Store entry for X rather than the app, even when you have the app installed.
34.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
If OpenAI doesn’t claim the millennium prize for this, who gets it? No one?
35.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
It’s perfectly legal to put a cellular modem in a TV, but not without disclosing that to the FCC and on product labels . This and the mesh network thing for TVs are (currently) a conspiracy theory, which sucks because it muddies the waters
36.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
The source video is excellent: https://youtu.be/6IFVTcM28KA I have two LG TVs so this freaks me out a lot. I guess I’m fortunate to have kept their network permanently disconnected (we use Apple TV for smart stuff) but who
37.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
I thought gimlet was a podcast studio. The subject of Startup season one, even. Not a good name for an unrelated startup.
38.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
Ok. For the avoidance of doubt, that is not what I was suggesting.
39.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
God damn this writing is just a string of pure claudeisms. I can’t see the actual content because I’m cringing so hard. Why not just post the info you want to convey and the prompt? It would be easier for everyone involved.
40.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
What an aggressive way to interact with people. Do you need a nap? Do you? Instead of replying to your rather silly question I’ll just point to this sibling which I’ll co-sign: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49568295
41.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
They haven’t been. I’m aware of new golf courses being planned in my area and I hear nothing but enthusiasm. Literally no one brings up water consumption as a concern. This whole thing is a sublimation of vaguer anxieties about AI (which ar
42.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
golf courses use much more. But you don’t see massive resistance against new golf courses being planned. Farms use an order of magnitude more than either. You don’t see any demands whatsoever on agriculture to reduce water usage.
43.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
The real reason that Anthropic was targeted and OpenAI is not is Palantir. It was a Palantir executive who pushed for the export ban. Large parts of their highly lucrative business with DoD are essentially a thin wrapper over Anthropic mode
44.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
Guessing this one will never show up in cursor…
45.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
“evade” itself is anthropomorphic enough! I don’t understand the complaining about this. Humans are social creatures and we understand anthropomorphic language on a deeper level than dry inapt technical language. language itself is incredib
46.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
That document looks like the change tickets I see at work when investigating internal outages: Risk: none Rollback plan: N/A
47.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
> opt-in by default Sorry to nitpick but the scheme you’re referring to is called “opt-out.”
48.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
Of course I believe that you act as you describe. But you are not an industry unto yourself. I apologize for questioning your professionalism and wish you all the best. Truly.
49.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
> That's called "being in a bubble". I’m perfectly willing to consider the possibility that you may be right, but “a bubble” implies something massive outside of it which constitutes a large majority of the whole,
50.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
> many industries that don't trust machine generated code in general. Which ones? Why wouldn’t careful human code review and extensive test coverage suffice? I work in one of the most conservative and highly regulated indust
51.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
Pretty sure it’s too late. Lawyers are lazy like everyone else. They don’t want to go back either.
52.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
I never said the approach was so stupid it could never work. I just shared how it’s annoying and how I worked around my annoyance. An even stupider approach would work exactly as well or better, like a form saying “type the letter y in this
53.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
Tough. The code isn’t worth enough to publish. It means nothing to me and I’d have to figure out how to do it pseudonymously. I only have the one GitHub account.
54.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
How good are you personally at iteratively and sequentially jumping through the legal systems of dozens of countries over the course of years, interleaved with genuinely difficult technical investigation, to unmask successive onion-layers o
55.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
You don’t need to spend $5000 to obtain the hash rate of a $5000 device on a rental basis. You may have heard of this thing called “the cloud”. Obtaining very high hash rates is effectively free, largely as a side effect of the crypto bust.
56.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
Why are you and other defenders of the Anubis approach so fixated on this one specific limitation of a certain type of scraping architecture? It’s hardly an immutable characteristic. You say “they” as if all scrapers are a monolithic group
57.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
I used sol as well. Should have noted that fable is more or less guaranteed to refuse something hacking-adjacent like that.
58.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
> meaningful dent Until you actually do the math and realize that it is not meaningful at all. It’s equivalent to the blogs that have a custom “bot protector” that asks you “what’s 2+2” every time you submit a comment. It might
59.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
OK, but that doesn't change anything. You have a large pool of IPs, each of which only needs to expend a handful of extra milliseconds of work to get unlimited access to the protected resource. Even if you had to solve a L6 challenge f
60.
by semiquaver 1mo ago
> I really don't see why Safari on a modern iPhone should be so slow at this me neither, but I don't think it changes the argument. There's always going to be someone on a low-end device. Your adversaries already

More ›