Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
semaphoreP
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
semaphoreP
12y ago
After knowing the answer is beige, it's not actually surprising after looking at the spectrum. The spectrum they show is mostly flat so you don't expect one color to dominate much over another (maybe a bit more red than blue..).
62.
▲
by
semaphoreP
12y ago
Red actually has a larger wavelength. Red is at ~600 nm, while green and blue are at ~500nm and ~400nm respectively. Red has a lower frequency though.
63.
▲
by
semaphoreP
12y ago
Looks like the H-alpha emisison line at 656 nm. It's a pretty strong line in many astrophysical sources.
64.
▲
by
semaphoreP
12y ago
You're probably using the rods in your eyes at night to look at the Milky Way and they can't see color.
65.
▲
by
semaphoreP
12y ago
If you mean subtracting out all the stars in our entire galaxy, then the night sky would get a lot dimmer. We'd only see the starlight from distant galaxies and the planets of our own solar system. If you mean just the streak across th
66.
▲
by
semaphoreP
12y ago
It's easy to see a few nearby bright stars, but it's hard to see all those dim stars that make up the distinctive structure of the Milky Way.
67.
▲
by
semaphoreP
12y ago
Not only that, but if you change the permittivity and permeability to that of any material, you get the speed of light in that material. And for all this to happen, you get the fact that light is an electromagnetic wave from Maxwell's
68.
▲
by
semaphoreP
12y ago
What I found peculiar about Google's application process was that all of the emails from Google's recruiters went straight into Gmail's spam folder.
69.
▲
by
semaphoreP
12y ago
I don't think the CAP theorem is so black and white: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem#2012