selfhoster1312

6 ms·

91.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
Well, i guess that's what i get for trying to sympathize with someone i disagree with. I have also been this person who doesn't fit in a group but only realizes too late. My bad for thinking we were having an interesting and hones
92.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
Sure, i linked the docs about private repos specifically. Public repositories of FLOSS are the mission of codeberg, minus slopware and shitcoins (the subject of this thread). I thought the FAQ was pretty clear about that, but if that's
93.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
> You say yourself you didn't even see all the comments. Yes, and i'm not claiming you're wrong in your feeling that some people were excessive about this. Though i could argue that LLM deployment has been excessive too an
94.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
As an example, deuxfleurs.fr, a french non-profit host, mentions issues with notifications, message history, and message searching as reasons to leave matrix in their latest newsletter: https://blog.deuxfleurs.fr/2026-bilan-
95.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
> it would be very important to have a system where anything I record for a narrow audience doesn't become available to the public That's precisely what the author is arguing.
96.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
Not in fact. On systems with permissions/privileges, you always return a 404 when a page does exist but the user doesn't have permission. Because sometimes leaking the existence of an item is a problem in itself.
97.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
> what is the methodology Overall: there are humans performing the moderations. I trust them to have good judgement. This is not a witch hunt proposing to delete every repository where Claude has ever committed. Personal interpretation:
98.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
The first link has been removed (or may be private). The second link and quotes sound bad, but placed in context they actually sound more reasonable arguments to me. The "limits of consent" was somewhat misplaced, but in reply to
99.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
> they have the potential to make our life better If you're a vegan as your nick suggests, i would suggest to reconsider this point. Capitalism was already bent on sending us towards a 6th mass species extinction (starting right und
100.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
Not really. See https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/faq/#how-about-pri...
101.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
I'm sorry but you are completely out of touch with reality. This is a non-profit calling on their members to vote. Non-members didn't have a say, so a random member posting on Mastodon is not going to influence the results in the
102.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
> Given they'll kick you off the platform if you're not aligned with FOSS views and act accordingly, it seems strange to have associated Codeberg with "freedom" at all. It's different conceptions of freedom. For
103.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
That would be a commercial activity. Codeberg is a non-profit host. I'm not familiar with german law but i assume non-profits can have some commercial activity (as long as they don't compete with commercial actors), but that wou
104.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
I don't know you, but my feeling is you have the wrong analysis grid here. This is a non-profit taking a stand for what's right in a world where everything's wrong. The discussion has been ongoing for several years, and the r
105.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
Freedom of expression does not mean my non-profit has to spend its resources to give you a platform. I'm not a member of Codeberg eV, but i strongly approve their decision. We need more hosts with a mission, especially when it comes to
106.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
All IT infrastructure providers are activists. The question is what is their politics? Github pushes for centralization, AI slop, and gathering code for the military-industrial complex. Twitter pushes for techno-fascism under our great and
107.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
I'm strongly anti-AI, but i upvoted your comment because it's the most reasonable one (in opposition to the AI ban) i've read so far. I haven't read those mastodon threads, but that sounds like a weird discourse. Are the
108.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
Bad example, you obviously didn't read the codeberg ToS. Codeberg banned projects that « mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools ». subsurface is apparently quality software with different contributors, and in
109.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
The discussion has been going on for years, but apparently the formal vote and terms of service change took place recently.
110.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
> what would happen if they were to decide to ban Ruby On Rails projects because of DHH's fascist actions Wow hold your horses. It's one thing to ban an individual and their projects. It's another thing entirely to ban an
111.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
This is not a marketing stunt. This is not a company and there is no PR department. This is a non-profit making a decision in its general assembly.
112.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
Did you even read the blog post or the ToS changes? You're either misinformed or lying. Banning projects that « mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools » is not the same as banning « all LLM assisted projects
113.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
It's not ridiculous. If it was for me, i would ban anyone who use LLMs at all, so banning projects that « mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools » sounds very light to me, a reasonable middle-ground to rally
114.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
Yes it's called the general assembly of codeberg eV (the non-profit). Members can vote, they have the power.
115.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
Your comment makes two wrong assumptions: 1. that LLMs actually improve project quality, which may be true for projects with very clear style guides and test suites (eg. the linux kernel) but may also be false for 99% of projects (are the L
116.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
No, the parent was precisely saying it's perfectly fine to take position, and it's nothing new for codeberg. In particular, the linked article was not just about countering spam, but also against « far-right ideologies ». So it&
117.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
The forum is only for members of the non-profit. I'm guessing the page is 404 because we are not dues-paying members, which is reasonable.
118.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
That was not a random popularity vibes. One of the discussion was from 3 years ago. Taking a political stand is part of codeberg DNA. If codeberg had no opinions and no politics then it would just never have existed. Unless your project is
119.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
Noone is changing their mind overnight. These discussions on Codeberg have been going on for years, and you know, if only from reading HN, that a certain portion of humanity is strongly opposed to cryptocurrency and LLM slop. There's n
120.
by selfhoster1312 3mo ago
garage was working fine in other scenarios but it really had pathological behavior with the small read/write with torrenting benchmarks. (see my previous link for detailed benchmarking) The reason for me for trying this setup was to pr

More ›