selectively

8 ms·

91.
by selectively 7mo ago
Phone bans are bad.
92.
by selectively 7mo ago
This hasn't been true for the time a typical American high school senior has been alive. Please stop repeating things people said years ago.
93.
by selectively 7mo ago
Yeah, you couldn't be more wrong here. The exact same people who thoroughly destroyed the 360 badly wanted to attack this system - they were just outgunned.
94.
by selectively 7mo ago
I have my doubts. I suspect that Nvidia have made mistakes. Anyway, situations like the one you describe are one to be solved by legislation requiring certain devices be sold as open devices that put power in the hands of the owner.
95.
by selectively 7mo ago
Where are the slides at?
96.
by selectively 7mo ago
The tragedy is that 'right to compute' is such a great name for something actually useful. Requiring OEMs to allow users to load any OS they want, requiring OEMs to allow full control over a device/OS ('root access'
97.
by selectively 7mo ago
You just linked AI slop.
98.
by selectively 7mo ago
Also a low quality source.
99.
by selectively 7mo ago
Something very wrong with you.
100.
by selectively 8mo ago
Unrelated to the laptops. Also, please don't link low quality sources (Yahoo) on HN.
101.
by selectively 8mo ago
In other words: you are a reactionary who thinks little of others. Noted.
102.
by selectively 8mo ago
Nope. That would require those same companies from not abusing our political process to obtain illegal political outcomes - outcomes that are unconstitutional - like Citizens United, which led to PHrMA dumping unimaginable money into bad fa
103.
by selectively 8mo ago
That's nice. The rest of the world has price caps on what these companies can charge for drugs. It's one or the other. You can have your ''patents'' and ''intellectual property'' respected..
104.
by selectively 8mo ago
Hn is loaded with bots and this thread in particular is full of things that somehow have less political literacy than the typical American 8th grader.
105.
by selectively 9mo ago
You are good.
106.
by selectively 9mo ago
I disagree with that analysis. It strikes me that a parent is denying a child access to something that the vast majority of other children have access to while that child is forced to live under a structure that prevents them from generatin
107.
by selectively 9mo ago
This is pseudo-intellectual nonsense - we are strangers to ourselves, we do not truly know how the mind works.
108.
by selectively 9mo ago
And the parents feel entitled to the truth...why? Children are not property. What specifically do you mean by 'stealing'?
109.
by selectively 9mo ago
You remain an awful person. I am happy to go through any form of humanity/identity verification that staff want me to. My posts are written by me and never AI - I strongly oppose genAI.
110.
by selectively 9mo ago
I think someone who is 22 was 17 in the not that distant past. Apple hires talent, they don't care about anything else. Again, I am speaking to things I know from my actual life and people I know in the physical world.
111.
by selectively 9mo ago
Yep. They hire talent. University grads will work alongside red team folks that are maybe 22 years old and have been at Apple for two years. It's a thing. I personally know more than one person who has a background along those lines.
112.
by selectively 9mo ago
Heroin is addictive. Physical compulsion is addiction. What you are talking about is not addiction. It shares some elements, but no one is breaking into cars so they can scroll Instagram.
113.
by selectively 9mo ago
Apple has an engineering base that includes people who were recently children. Think about it that way: why would they make things harder for who they were in the very recent past.
114.
by selectively 9mo ago
The Gabb thing is the fault of the parent. By buying a child a locked down device - a hostile device that few would have accepted for themselves as a child - they marked them as 'being a child' rather than blending in with the res
115.
by selectively 11mo ago
Hetzner is also sinkholed by lots of EDR products because they host a ton of malicious garbage. They are a bad actor.
116.
by selectively 11mo ago
It's almost like Clouds are really good at scaling and some rented server isn't! Perfect, almost poetic.
117.
by selectively 11mo ago
Idiotic piece - the purpose of 'the cloud' is to scale large demand applications. Rental hardware can't really do that.