selcuka

7 ms·

151.
by selcuka 5mo ago
If it's worthless to AI vendors, they won't include it in the training corpus, so third parties won't have access to it.
152.
by selcuka 5mo ago
Amazon SQS has a similar (1MB per message) size limit.
153.
by selcuka 5mo ago
That's an interesting take. You didn't want to bother with running a local Temporal, but you are happy to engineer it yourself in Postgres?
154.
by selcuka 5mo ago
I always found it weird to ship a BASIC interpreter that didn't have specialised commands (unless you count POKE) to access the graphics and sound capabilities of a computer like the C64. Some computers of the same era had vastly super
155.
by selcuka 5mo ago
> If this researcher actually had a vendetta, I'd expect them to just sell the remaining zero-days to the highest bidder. How do we know they didn't? It's called zero-day because Microsoft wasn't aware of the exploits
156.
by selcuka 5mo ago
They have already been experimenting with such ideas [1]: > Claude Code Removed from $20-a-Month "Pro" Subscription for New Users [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47855832
157.
by selcuka 5mo ago
https://github.com/Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts
158.
by selcuka 5mo ago
> a zero-try attempt is a paradox and cannot exist Have you tried applying L'Hôpital's Rule?
159.
by selcuka 5mo ago
What I said is not subjective/speculative. It is not even unfalsifiable. To restate, COVID vaccine can't be used as an example of "science/technology's sympathy towards the bottom rungs". They were only accessi
160.
by selcuka 5mo ago
The GP also said "vetting of certain goods is a good idea".
161.
by selcuka 5mo ago
> Now, if we’re shifting to why advances are often generally available But it's not me who is shifting, right? The claim was: > Science and technology, I feel, has always had a certain apathy towards the plight [of] the people at
162.
by selcuka 5mo ago
Do we see someone thanking us as wasting food? Because technically it is.
163.
by selcuka 5mo ago
That's only because Google is an LLM now.
164.
by selcuka 5mo ago
I'm in a similar boat. Today I commented on a junior developer's pull request, and he pasted the answer he got from Claude Code, verbatim. Ignoring how disrespectful that behaviour is, I can't understand what value he thinks
165.
by selcuka 5mo ago
That's the point. Plumbers will be broke, too, because people who are supposed to hire them will not have jobs.
166.
by selcuka 5mo ago
Very true. Someone could place a huge bet for "person X will NOT be assassinated in the next 24 hours" and some lowlife could see the opportunity.
167.
by selcuka 5mo ago
Were the vaccines accessible because of the sympathy towards the people at the bottom, or so that they can go back to work as soon as possible? Medicine is subsidised when there is a global pandemic, but not when individual lives are at sta
168.
by selcuka 5mo ago
Correct. I believe the desire to start a new company or to retire would be higher on the list.
169.
by selcuka 5mo ago
Joel Spolsky sold Trello to Atlassian in 2017, so he was already rich before the Stack Exchange exit.
170.
by selcuka 5mo ago
It doesn't matter because the duplicate is linked to the original, so most visitors coming from Google would still view the actual answer. It works like a soft HTTP 302 response.
171.
by selcuka 5mo ago
It's still not correct to call them DOS games as you can't run them on DOS.
172.
by selcuka 5mo ago
> I guess they mean customer's private repos? I don't think so. It is even worse if a random developer has access to customers' private repos.
173.
by selcuka 5mo ago
> The hard problem is Chalmers proof that physicalism could never be true. This is not fully correct. His position has been "naturalistic dualism", that is, consciousness is a fundamental feature of reality alongside physical p
174.
by selcuka 5mo ago
Because less is more?
175.
by selcuka 5mo ago
It's a fair point, though. If one rejects a subjective experience without any doubt, the most plausible explanation is that they don't have that subjective experience. If I tell you that I see numbers as colours, and you say &quot
176.
by selcuka 5mo ago
I've been thinking the same (that people who claim it doesn't exist don't have it) but it had never occurred to me that it might be on a spectrum. It actually makes perfect sense.
177.
by selcuka 5mo ago
I believe it's a concept that is hard to explain. This other comment of mine may be a bit clearer: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175605
178.
by selcuka 5mo ago
Note that you said "this spreadsheet and I", meaning that there is something particularly precious about the current "I". You don't think that you'd suddenly become the spreadsheet, "detaching" (can&#
179.
by selcuka 5mo ago
> from an outside observer’s perspective, there is no contradiction Indeed. As I said, the question is meaningless from an outside observer's perspective. The paper "Against Egalitarianism" by Benj Hellie [1] explains it b
180.
by selcuka 5mo ago
> So, what, "complexity isn't a sufficient explanation," and _also_ "it's perfectly reasonable to believe it's the result of processes we don't understand?" Those are not conflicting arguments. The

More ›