sejje

23 ms·

601.
by sejje 1y ago
LLM output might be harder to spot when it's mostly commands to drive the browser. I often interact with the web all day and don't write any text a human could evaluate.
602.
by sejje 1y ago
I'm capable of asking it a couple of times about the same thing. It's unlikely to make up the same bullshit twice. Usually exploring a topic in depth finds these issues pretty quickly.
603.
by sejje 1y ago
It's not my experience that there are missing pieces as compared to anything else. Nobody can write an exhaustive tome and explore every feature, use, problem, and pitfall of Python, for example. Every text on the topic will omit somet
604.
by sejje 1y ago
I agree, but it's a known limitation. I've been duped a couple times, but I mostly can tell when it's full of shit. Some topics you learn to beware and double check. Or ask it to cite sources. (For me, that's car repair.
605.
by sejje 1y ago
I googled a command line string to do XYZ thing once, and found my own blog post. I really do write that stuff for myself, turns out.
606.
by sejje 1y ago
All the same ways I know when Internet comments, outdated books, superstitions, and other humans are bullshitting me. Sometimes right away, something sounds wrong. Sometimes when I try to apply the knowledge and discover a problem. Sometime
607.
by sejje 1y ago
I used llms to teach me a programming language recently. It was way nicer than a book. That's the experience I'm speaking from. It wasn't perfect, and it was wrong sometimes, sure. A known limitation. But it was flexible, and
608.
by sejje 1y ago
Cliff notes with a near-infinite zoom feature. The criticism of cliff's notes is generally that it's a superficial glance. It can't go deeper, it's basically a summary. The LLM is not that. It can zoom in and out of a to
609.
by sejje 1y ago
I learned how to code using the library in the 90s. I think it's accurate to say that if I had to do that again, I'm basically screwed. Asking the LLM is a vastly superior experience. I had to learn what my local library had, not
610.
by sejje 1y ago
Humans are used to ignoring things while LLMs are explicitly trained to pay attention to the entire text. Humans who haven't been exposed to trick problems or careful wording probably have a hard time, they'll be less confident ab
611.
by sejje 1y ago
Stochastic parrot is the term. I don't think it's ever been accurate.
612.
by sejje 1y ago
His answer implies you can run them locally now, just not in a useful timeframe.
613.
by sejje 1y ago
Most professional software engineers have never written a game and don't do web work, so I somehow doubt that.
614.
by sejje 1y ago
Is this some kind of joke? That's how you write css. The examples aren't the same at all, they just use the same css feature. It feels like you aren't a coder--you've sabotaged your own point.
615.
by sejje 1y ago
Or "I'm a power user" of sorts. Probably a very small minority of users fiddle that setting. Dang said a similarly small minority of users here do all the commenting.
616.
by sejje 1y ago
I lost my first website, it was on angel fire. Frames layout, goldeneye fanboy page. They have a lot of the old sites, but not mine.
617.
by sejje 1y ago
Did he get the kind of job he hoped for?
618.
by sejje 1y ago
Maybe the html caption under the image broke their parser
619.
by sejje 1y ago
Terrifying? What was your experience with an IG?
620.
by sejje 1y ago
Maybe you had a hard time parsing his comment. He is capable of pressing twice as hard as the feature required at maximum. The screen handles 2x the maximum without issues. Therefore, the glass is thick enough to handle half that pressure,a
621.
by sejje 1y ago
Disagree. I mean that's nice, but now that I know about the zero day, I can find the link to a source myself in about 10 seconds.
622.
by sejje 1y ago
Sourceforge used to be a primary location for getting software. It did suck balls, but we were grateful to have it in a time where it was possibly the best option.
623.
by sejje 1y ago
Yes, I did it on purpose to show that the words used make them easy to reverse. I think one word should be stronger, or unambiguous. Tornado sighting Tornado alarm Tornado touchdown Tornado lookout Tornado conditions Tornado possibility I g
624.
by sejje 1y ago
I reversed them on purpose to make a point, so I don't feel mocked. My point was how easy it is to mix them up. Warnings and watches are, linguistically, very similar. Additionally, his comment was a gentle correction, not mocking. I t
625.
by sejje 1y ago
But you don't go to hell, the consequence isn't real. So when you bring it back to big tech, you've defeated your own argument.
626.
by sejje 1y ago
> Most products and services available to us today are unnecessary, unsustainable, destructive (economically and socially Can you provide some examples of this to anchor your argument? I can sometimes come up with a few niche jobs, but n
627.
by sejje 1y ago
Right, so: Warning, tornadoes might occur. Watch out, we saw a tornado!
628.
by sejje 1y ago
Maybe he's referencing how people don't like when other humans post LLM responses in the comments. "Here's what chatGPT said about..." I don't like that, either. I love the LLM for answering my own questions, t
629.
by sejje 1y ago
Why are these called bunkers?
630.
by sejje 1y ago
I use aider paired with vim. In separate tabs.

More ›