sejje

18 ms·

421.
by sejje 10mo ago
I don't really know any adults who don't drive, and nobody ever told me they weren't capable. I don't think it's about driving ability, besides the initial vetting.
422.
by sejje 10mo ago
If I threw my license away tomorrow, what would be insane about me driving without a license? Are you saying "unlicensed" where you mean "untrained?"
423.
by sejje 10mo ago
How many BBs do you think JJ is worth being dealt preflop? I suggest you confirm your guess. How many times do you see an obvious nut hand get called on the river by someone to whom it isn't obvious, for hundreds of BBs? (Every single
424.
by sejje 10mo ago
Considering a squeeze puts deepseek ahead of most human players. Maybe not an optimal squeeze, but most human players flat if they're going to play. Grok's play is obviously bad, no solver needed. I wonder what he said in the &quo
425.
by sejje 10mo ago
Solvers, in a poker context, are a category of programs. They run a simulation after you enter the known information. Like piosolver, as an example. The best poker-playing AI is not beatable by anyone, so yes, it would crush the LLMs.
426.
by sejje 10mo ago
That's, in fact, a much smaller mistake than I see humans make every hour.
427.
by sejje 10mo ago
They offer (real) poker at some casinos. It's standard NLHE usually 100-200bb max buyin, sometimes match the stack etc. Most common game spread is 9-handed $200 max $1/$2 NLHE. It's exactly like the game on the link, except m
428.
by sejje 10mo ago
Typically when you run a simulation on a hand, you give it some bet size options. To limit the scope of what it has to simulate. It's unlikely they're perfect, but there's very small differences in EV betting 100% vs 101.6% o
429.
by sejje 10mo ago
Not really. Only as far as their table image mattered--in this case, zero. Otherwise, you can and should ignore your own past play. What I'm curious about is if their innate training is enough to give them biases. Like maybe they think
430.
by sejje 10mo ago
I used to play professionally, and I still play in the casinos. These LLMs are playing better than most human players I encounter (low limits). They're kinda bad, but not as criminally bad as the humans.
431.
by sejje 10mo ago
The solvers don't typically work in real time, I don't think. They take a while to crunch a hand.
432.
by sejje 10mo ago
Yes, but it's in the deli area instead of the bread aisle, and it's not as common in America. Sunbeam, wonderbread, Bunny -- these are staples in most homes. That's what a peanut butter and jelly is supposed to be made on, or
433.
by sejje 10mo ago
When I hear "ultra-processed," here's what comes to mind: - little Debbie snack cakes - cereals - white breads - hot dogs - chips - pizza rolls - Velveeta - pop tarts So I guess you're right, it has no meaning. But you&#
434.
by sejje 10mo ago
Sure, but not all of them are stupid enough to keep doing that while watching the model degrade, if it indeed does.
435.
by sejje 10mo ago
I bet they'll only train on the internet snapshot from now, before LLMs. Additional non-internet training material will probably be human created, or curated at least.
436.
by sejje 10mo ago
I use fast mail and still have my legacy Gmail. I don't get spam on either. Gmail account is from year one, fastmail account predates that (~27 years old), so they both receive plenty.
437.
by sejje 10mo ago
That's not how it works, they're just inflating the importance of their work by elevating it to a battlefield, and they're the heroes. You see it across all kinds of industries. Presumably each individual is just engaged in t
438.
by sejje 10mo ago
Would SpaceX exist if your ideas were in charge?
439.
by sejje 10mo ago
Why did you abandon your own thread, OP?
440.
by sejje 10mo ago
Okay, how many people do you think they've deported?
441.
by sejje 10mo ago
There's a "git bisect" command waiting to get in the game
442.
by sejje 10mo ago
That's fair, but it's also fair for me to have priorities, and to participate in something I think should change. I think the non-political threads are where HN shines, and I believe in playing to your strengths. This is a wonderf
443.
by sejje 10mo ago
Which citizen was deported without seeing a judge? If you mean they're deporting illegals without them seeing a judge, I'd be in favor of that. Why does a 0% chance of a citizen being deported alarm you?
444.
by sejje 10mo ago
Countries would be scrambling to team with the USA IMO. You see the same happen for obvious "bad actors" now. There's more than four non-European countries in the world, Christ. Also, I think America can make it on its own, n
445.
by sejje 10mo ago
We'll have to address it if it ever happens. I doubt we're the first to consider it happening, including the folks who drafted the amendment. I don't really think you're that clever, no offense. Other humans can think of
446.
by sejje 10mo ago
I think we agree, you're just misrepresenting my position. The OP is talking about the Venezuela story on the front page. It's not a good example of what you're talking about.
447.
by sejje 10mo ago
I think where the politics bleed into tech, we should allow the politics to bleed into discussions, staying on topic. If the Tesla article commenters are talking about ICE, it's a problem. But just posting political news to the front p
448.
by sejje 10mo ago
Oh don't get me wrong, I've got multiple comments in that exact thread. I still would rather not see it here. I get my fill of politics elsewhere.
449.
by sejje 10mo ago
I didn't say it required tech, just that it didn't have any. It's exactly what they'd put on mainstream news. It IS mainstream news. I'm usually in the thread defending the unusual, non-tech posts. One of the most c
450.
by sejje 10mo ago
To be on the scale of social media, you'll need to be a profitable billion dollar business. Nobody has supported billions of users with modest goals. It's nearly an oxymoron.

More ›