sejje

10 ms·

1. 331.▲
   by sejje 9mo ago

   What makes the roomba a liability?
2. 332.▲
   by sejje 9mo ago

   I can't speak for the other guy, but as a person who manages humans at work: I'd rather have a robot at home. 1) I live way, way out in the middle of nowhere. 2) Humans are fickle, late, emotional. They have requirements in their
3. 333.▲
   by sejje 9mo ago

   Aren't the humanoid robots looking to ship around 20k? You can hardly even buy a reliable new car for that amount.
4. 334.▲
   by sejje 9mo ago

   Why thousands per month? Why would cloud connectivity be required? (I'm almost certain you're right, the big makers will require cloud--but that's not a requirement of the tech, is it?)
5. 335.▲
   by sejje 9mo ago

   And another thought: if the robot can do housework, can it do factory work? Fieldwork? Lawn care? What else can it do with zero modifications? That expands the market greatly.
6. 336.▲
   by sejje 9mo ago

   I agree there's a great market for specialized ones. I own some of those, like a vacuum bot. But the generic robot is the endgame. I think Musk tries to achieve the endgame, probably too soon. FSD, interplanetary travel, etc
7. 337.▲
   by sejje 9mo ago

   Deaf people drive. I knew a guy with no arms who drove with his prosthetic hooks. Of course he can feel vibrations and things through his ass, but so could the car if they wanted. Do they use accelerometer data? (I don't know the answe
8. 338.▲
   by sejje 9mo ago

   Yeah, but even if the safety level was 10% better, let's say--nobody would accept that rate. It wouldn't get adopted, we wouldn't be happy to save those lives. People would be outraged. I think it's got something to do w
9. 339.▲
   by sejje 9mo ago

   Actually, that's the standard we're all talking about. Nearly everyone is totally fine with human-caused traffic deaths. Nobody wants to ban human drivers at that rate of death. But if FSD had the same rate, people would be losing
10. 340.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    > When Mom can dispatch the family car to pick up the kids from school. Tech level, I agree--that's FSD. But even if we had that tech today, Mom ain't sending the car without getting a police visit. You can't even let your
11. 341.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    I'm able to drive without lidar, with just my eyeball feeds. I agree that lidar is very valuable right now, but I think in the endgame, yeah it can drive with just cameras. The logic follows, because I drive with just "cameras.&qu
12. 342.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    Will humans?
13. 343.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    > Cases are not dismissed based on lack of probable cause. I must insist that they are. "Police must have probable cause to arrest you, and when officers lack sufficient facts and circumstances to justify arrest, courts dismiss resu
14. 344.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    Your arguments are really just based in misnaming things?
15. 345.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    ICE aren't law enforcement? What do you think they are? What do you think the E stands for?
16. 346.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    Answer to what question?
17. 347.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    I agree, social credit is changing. We're not as friendly with other western nations anymore, we're dictating terms. When will we start seeing the downtrend?
18. 348.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    How come all the existing tariffs don't tank the economy?
19. 349.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    I guess you mean informed people. There's a whole lot of smart people in this thread who aren't talking about differentials. I don't know shit about tariffs, except what everyone said in the news. It was going to tank the eco
20. 350.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    > "When Julia objected, the officer threatened Julia that Jade would be immediately sent to a foster home in the United States if Julia did not write a note stating that Jade would be deported to Honduras with her." The officer
21. 351.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    I felt it, because I believed the tariffs would tank the economy. Now I'm rethinking my position.
22. 352.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    I agree they've been very erratic. What does that have to do with whether or not our economy tanked as a result? It didn't, the prophecies were FUD, everything he does is bad, blah blah. Trump's a lethal threat that is too in
23. 353.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    > A Trump-appointed Federal judge clearly did not find that excuse compelling. A Trump-appointed judge set a hearing about a situation where he was told a US citizen was being deported. I would expect any judge to care about that, regard
24. 354.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    > No one ever judges economic health by the stock market which you seem to be doing On the news stations they do, and it was a bunch of FUD about the stock markets tanking. Tesla, too. "Look what he's done to his brand, let&#x2
25. 355.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    So Trump's tariffs didn't tank the economy because everyone outsmarted him?
26. 356.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    So it wasn't what they expected?
27. 357.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    My costs are falling. I buy a lot of groceries for my business, so I have decent records. Beef is way up, though. Gas is way down as well.
28. 358.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    Why are they wearing masks?
29. 359.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    I do. I don't own an airtag.
30. 360.▲
    by sejje 9mo ago

    > Increasing the friction and difficulty to stalk someone definitely results in less actual stalking. No it doesn't.