Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
seeekr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
91.
▲
by
seeekr
8y ago
Wasn't their public reaction as it was due to liability concerns? i.e. if they admitted that something was wrong with their chips, they may have gotten into significant legal / financial trouble?
92.
▲
by
seeekr
8y ago
I believe it is quite clear to many of us familiar with the space that Microsoft is not some small-time backer of the Linux Foundation and other, related organizations. I certainly did not feel the least bit of an attempt to downplay MS
93.
▲
by
seeekr
8y ago
Hi HN friends, I've built a little tool [1] that makes it easy to create screenshots and PDFs of your own websites/webapps. It's a use case I've found in a friend's web project, decided to SaaS-ify it for them in or
94.
▲
Show HN: hdlss.io: web page to image and pdf in the cloud using headless chrome
(github.com)
1 points
by
seeekr
8y ago
|
3 comments
95.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
fly.io is aimed at very different use cases. It is essentially a programmable CDN, and priced like a CDN, too ($0.10/GB traffic). You would not enjoy the bill for trying to serve all of your video content through it, and you also don&#
96.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
Vimeo is not an appropriate solution for the use cases that I have in mind. I don't think Vimeo would be fine with serving dozens of TBs of traffic for you, or storing many TBs of video content. Vimeo is aimed at professionals and comp
97.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
Hetzner for storage and traffic, Scaleway for serving additional traffic for free, to stretch the dollar further. At 5TB you probably don't need anything but the raw file system yet, but if you do want some redundancy you could add som
98.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
So that means that the synchronization cost would only be paid when making a new copy of the Arc and releasing each of those. Ok, that extends the set of use cases where it's acceptable to use Arc then. Thanks for clarifying. EDIT: wor
99.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
But isn't it an anti-pattern to wrap something in an `Arc` when some of your use cases for it are purely single-threaded, and as such you're wasting a certain (potentially very significant) amount of performance on upholding memor
100.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
Put Cloudflare in front for SSL. Not sure if that makes the solution more or less complex, never worked with Route53.
101.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
I've built a bunch of simple scripts for this that you can find here [0]. It's not polished for public consumption or updated to k8s 1.10 yet, but it's what I use for production clusters, some of them single-node. Run the pre
102.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
Not saying anything about GraphQL in particular as I have almost no experience with it in practice, but there are cases where REST is simply unbeatable, especially if you're very comfortable with it: Simple APIs, encapsulating simple d
103.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
What you need is a code generation library that will turn the AST back into JS code once you've identified which part of the syntax tree you're interested in. And that's the code you want to then eval(). Esprima has escodegen
104.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
You could use a parser like esprima or its equivalent from the babeljs ecosystem on the JS source instead and just find the global variable with name `__STATE__` and just eval its init expression. Cheaper, more secure, more direct than actu
105.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
The smoothness of the marquee text is irritating. ;-) On a more serious note (haha), awesome theme. Tempted to think up something to build with it :-D
106.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
I would be interested in hearing about some examples. I'm one of those who are not yet taking advantage of these potential drastic improvements you are referring to.
107.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
The significant (and only) feature addition being HTTP/2 server push support: > Feature: HTTP/2 server push support; the "http2_push" and "http2_push_preload" directives.
108.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
So this video features a self-driving car developed by Yandex. Does someone have insight into why so many big tech companies seem to all be in agreement that developing self-driving cars is an area they need to be pursuing? Is it mostly eve
109.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
I would guess that both of you received downvotes because both comments failed to provide any explanation for the view expressed. I think it's good practice on HN to briefly introduce a technology where it's safe to assume that a
110.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
JIT engines usually don't do static analysis. I'm not sure if that is because the cost for that is that much higher, but a hint towards why could be that the engine simply does not know which parts of the (potentially huge amounts
111.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
The author has proven exactly this point: By going through a number of engine-specific / implementation-specific code transformations they have achieved a significant performance boost for hot code, which, for whatever reason, the JS e
112.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
Your comment spawned the following (minor?) idea for me: A lot of the devices (and hence IP addresses) we basically know are never going to be accessed directly by a human being, only through some combination of tools and automated processe
113.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
It seems to me there is no reason we shouldn't be able to create an "optimizing babel" that could be doing performance optimizations based on the target JS engine and version, as a build step. I don't think we need to go
114.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
We've done so much learning about good UX, backwards compatibility and smooth upgrade paths in the years since IPv6 was first thought of and specified that I suggest there is a group of people out there (or on here) who can sensibly co
115.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
Hypothesis: Mass adoption of IPv6 is blocked by the ugliness/inconvenience of the IPv6 address format, hence "end-users" (developers) don't like adopting IPv6. As long as this UX issue does not get solved, IPv6 adoption
116.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
There's actually a link somewhere to a page[0] that, all the way at the bottom states the price as USD$25,000 for a "Commercial License, yearly renewal". [0] https://flintbox.com/public/project/47343
117.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
(2015)
118.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
To every weirdo there's a counterpart <3 (And to non-weirdos as well.)
119.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
Wasn't aware either. +1 supporter.
120.
▲
by
seeekr
9y ago
Here's how your comment made sense to me even though I had read the article and understood that it's not talking about literal "whales": You mention few customers bringing in the major share of the revenue, and that'
More ›