sedawkgrep

5 ms·

31.
by sedawkgrep 5mo ago
You don’t think there might be a better solution than having a dozen or more companies all launching thousands of satellites which all perform the same function?
32.
by sedawkgrep 5mo ago
> at least it's also hilarious. Until it stops being hilarious. Then what?
33.
by sedawkgrep 5mo ago
I thought this was debunked awhile ago. ?
34.
by sedawkgrep 6mo ago
A strong and convincing rebuttal!
35.
by sedawkgrep 7mo ago
My buddy and I are writing our own CRUD web app to track our gaming. I was looking at a ticketing system to use for us to just track bug fixes and improvements. Nothing I found was simple enough or easy enough to warrant installing it. I
36.
by sedawkgrep 7mo ago
I don't understand why people with this opinion think it's worth the effort to post it.
37.
by sedawkgrep 7mo ago
You're a gamblin' man, I see...
38.
by sedawkgrep 7mo ago
Thanks - I downloaded the repo but it's only ~64MB zipped. No way that's all of AIX 4.1.3. :(
39.
by sedawkgrep 7mo ago
As a long-time AIX admin I'd LOOOOOVE to see some of the AIX source. I used to be connected to the community where stuff like this was passed around. But that was a long, long time ago.
40.
by sedawkgrep 7mo ago
Dunno but the repo is 4+ years old.
41.
by sedawkgrep 8mo ago
Wow I don't know how I missed that...
42.
by sedawkgrep 8mo ago
Wow I never knew this existed. Thanks for pointing this out!
43.
by sedawkgrep 8mo ago
Do you have any source for any of this?
44.
by sedawkgrep 8mo ago
Googling turns up a multitude. Quick Look says in 2025 $2B worth of us crops went to USAID. More info here. https://www.agweb.com/news/policy/politics/usaid-dismantling...
45.
by sedawkgrep 8mo ago
Indeed. This is Chess 960.
46.
by sedawkgrep 8mo ago
In my experience, PF operates a LOT more like commercial firewalls in how you think about filtering and NAT. In Linux, even with nftables you still have the concepts of "chains" which goes all the way back to the ipchains days. IM
47.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
> Surely the variety of NAT that significantly improves the IPv4 address starvation problem (IP Masq by its various names) requires a connection oriented approach to be effective? Actually it doesn't. Well, not really. With NAT you
48.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
In an enterprise network, it's very, very unlikely that an edge router is doing any firewalling. They can do it, but it's not only cumbersome to do it there, but also a massive resource drain. Often they do basic stateless pack
49.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
Not finding anything saying that ISPs have anything to do with Eagerbee.
50.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
yeah but the likelihood of this is incredibly remote. It would shock me if ISPs didn't have alarms going off if RFC1918 space was suddenly routable within their BGP table. Not to mention the return packet would be NAT'd so the at
51.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
Who exactly is going to route/send an RFC1918 address to an Internet gateway? Are you implying your ISP itself is going to do this? Because the Internet at-large doesn't have routes for your internal address space.
52.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
It's absolutely common in enterprise networks.
53.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
> Do you have any examples of NAT that isn't implemented in a more general firewall subsystem? When I was a network engineer, we did NAT on edge routers for B2B connections all the time. Like literally hundreds of thousands of them
54.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
> Except in the real world everyone ...and goes on to ignore enterprise businesses, which consume most of the v4 space and are among the biggest resisters of v6.
55.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
Nonsense in how they approached things. Clinton-era we had govt. cut backs all over the place. It was done according to a plan and according to the law. This was just a hatchet job, aimed and cutting and gutting any and every agency they
56.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
> I get all of that... but it just sounds like you're arguing that either using RFC1918, or someone's inability to route to your router, is a firewall. Yes and no. The effect is the same; packets are dropped. If you have no p
57.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
Literally the first line in the description: > vamos is a tool that allows to run AmigaOS m68k CLI binaries directly on your Mac or PC.
58.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
Look I get where you're going with this. I do. All things being equal, a device that routes packets will route packets whether or not a NAT is in place. That's not the issue at hand. The situation is simply that except in the r
59.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
NAT effectively stops inbound connectivity at the NAT edge. A system could be a dozen hops beyond that and no inbound traffic can reach it. IPv6 (without any NAT) means that the source and destination are fully routable. How folks DON&#x27
60.
by sedawkgrep 9mo ago
I left my job as a NE/architect over a 15 years ago, but the show stopper back then revolved around how to handle routing with firewalling. Firewalling being biggest roadblock due to needing traffic symmetry. I'm doing my best t

More ›