Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sean_pedersen
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
5y ago
I think you are right, since it entails the Halting problem it is not computable and thus not even in NP.
62.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
5y ago
Yes I am not aware of any proof on that one. Do you think it will suffice to generalize the statement to just "NP problem" instead?
63.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
5y ago
Good input, added it to the TODO list.
64.
▲
Kolmogorov Complexity: Extensions and Applications
(blog.neotree.uber.space)
107 points
by
sean_pedersen
5y ago
|
33 comments
65.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
I don't get how the additive solution does not require to understand the whole system and all it's interactions. If I place a jenga block I need to understand the static properties of the whole jenga tower to prevent collapse.
66.
▲
HyperTag 0.6.3: Knowledge Management for Humans Using Machine Learning and Tags
(github.com)
2 points
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
|
0 comments
67.
▲
FOSS replacing Google, Twitter, Spotify, Signal, GitHub and Co
(blog.neotree.uber.space)
2 points
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
|
0 comments
68.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
x=1? But for real good point, I don't know how Matrix scales vs Signal.
69.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Time to jump ship! Use element / matrix an open, decentralized, end-to-end encrypted chat protocol with slick clients for Android, iOS, Desktop & Web: https://element.io/ Also easy to self-host a server, if you nee
70.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
No cuz people also get that gMail or Outlook is different from eMail.
71.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Use Matrix with Element! https://element.io/
72.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
https://github.com/SeanPedersen/HyperTag HyperTag helps humans intuitively express how they think about their files using tags and machine learning. Represent how you think using tags. Find what you look for using sema
73.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
I got the most value out of studying deep theory and then applying that knowledge to real problems. That is just a rare combination for most courses in my experience to offer. Sadly most are of the form: study a lot by heart for the finals.
74.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Oh I got a lot of value out of my degree. I enjoyed the theory the most. Trees, Graphs, Algorithmic Complexity and Artificial Intelligence are my deepest interests and I have studied the theory of them in depth. It is just that the way how
75.
▲
Why I will not finish my Bachelor Degree in Computer Science
(blog.neotree.uber.space)
1 points
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
|
4 comments
76.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Glad you like it. Feel free to give some feedback, once you tried it out.
77.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Interesting, I just realized I should market my project as a personal knowledge management system as well. Thanks a bunch! https://github.com/SeanPedersen/HyperTag
78.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Would like to see more messaging services jump in on Matrix protocol. Signal would be huge.
79.
▲
HyperTag: File Organization Made for Humans
(blog.neotree.uber.space)
2 points
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
|
0 comments
80.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
I did not mean monopoly in the literal sense, just used it to express my feeling that a lot ends up flagged as spam that is not from these major corps servers.
81.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
(x) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it PoW hardness can be controlled with a parameter. (x) Users of email will not put up with it It is optional (no one is forced to use it). (x) Microso
82.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Cool template! I just think you ticked too much off. This is my take: Your post advocates a (x) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based ( ) vigilante approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't wo
83.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Wait what? I thought major players like GMail, Microsoft etc. have some kinda "monopoly" on eMail because they are gatekeeping by using a strict white list.
84.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Than you will have many false positives.
85.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Thanks for the reference. But this misses out on another important tool already in use against spamming: White lists. Yes, in theory PoW makes mass mailing very expensive and thus directly hurts spammers that are not on the common anti-spam
86.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
OK after giving this idea a little bit more thought. This is the deal: PoW for eMail needs to come with a parameter that controls the amount of work (computation) done to find the PoW hash. This allows senders to choose on a continuous scal
87.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
If they add PoW to their malware, it will slow them down or even alert users / admins because of the high CPU usage it will cause.
88.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Yes pass it down to the user by computing eMail PoW client side if that is a concern for your business...
89.
▲
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
Not every server needs to understand it. Only the ones wanting to participate. If you choose to filter by PoW and a server does not provide PoW, you will still receive all of its emails just flagged as spam. So email PoW roll out can work i
90.
▲
Ask HN: Why isn't email spam solved using Proof of Work yet?
23 points
by
sean_pedersen
6y ago
|
54 comments
More ›