Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sdesol
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
53 ms
·
571.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
> I think Microsoft is handling this really well. What is baffling for me, is how worried some people seem to be. If you understand the Git hosting space, you would know Microsoft tried to compete with GitHub and failed miserably. It is
572.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
> It helps smaller players (Gitlab, etc.) to break the monopoly of Github Or do the opposite. If Microsoft decides to make private repos on GitHub free, I can see VERY big issues for other players. I suspect more people use GitHub alte
573.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
Thanks for the link. Purchasing GitHub, if true, can certainly complicate things.
574.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
You can see when Gitea forked from Gogs at https://public.gitsense.com/insight/github?r=gogs/gogs::go-g... The following shows how active the two products are: https://public.gitsense.com/insight&#
575.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
> nothing more terrifying to me than MS becoming even close to as powerful as it used to be I've written about this in length in the past, but Git ensures Microsoft cannot be as "evil" as you may think they can be/bec
576.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
Thanks, updated!
577.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
It's 100% related, but I would also not read too much into the numbers. There will always be a small minority that hates Microsoft like no tomorrow and this is very much reflected on reddit ( https://reddit.com/r/p
578.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
If Microsoft decides to make GitHub free for all, this can honestly have a devastating affect on GitLab and Bitbucket. I really think Microsoft is a lot more interested in: - capturing developer data for ML/AI research - identify new
579.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
> Interestingly enough they're actively working on public vsts repositories Is this public knowledge? They shutdown their public repos service a while back and I had a manager at Microsoft admit that getting public repo traction was
580.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
If you have more than 5 contributors, you can probably afford to spend $5/user/month If that isn't the case, then GitLab/Gogs/Gitea/etc. is probably the better route to go.
581.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
> leverage Github to promote other (licensed) MS software. This is pretty much business 101. You have loss leaders, that are solely designed to drive traffic to different products.
582.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
Here is a more detailed analysis, which shows all contributors: https://public.gitsense.com/insight/github?r=git/git#b%3Dgit... These are contributions by Linus: https://public.gitsense.com/insight
583.
▲
by
sdesol
8y ago
Here is the development activity between the two projects: https://public.gitsense.com/insight/github?r=gogits/gogs::go... In the last 365 days, there were 54 unique contributors to Gogs https://public.
584.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
The 90's also had ClearCase, which is quite revolutionary for its time and I guess it still is. It was a beast to maintain and IBM was making a killing in annual license fee (~3000 per license)
585.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
> I wish I could understand the value add of yet another IDE. I was in the same boat as you, when Atom and VS Code was gaining a lot of popularity. For the life of me, I couldn't understand why GitHub and Microsoft was throwing SO
586.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
> I don't want to just see the final state of ours/theirs, but the changes that us/them did in order to get to those final states. I'm curious, would something like this help you better understand a complex merge? h
587.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
> How much value do you think there would be in some sort of semantic analysis Disclaimer: I'm the founder of GitSense ( https://gitsense.com ), which is also focused on predictive defect analysis, among other things. Inco
588.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
And if the border guard doesn't like the wording, they'll reject you at the border.
589.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
But software programmers don't qualify for TN visa. System analyst is the closes I think.
590.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
I've heard it's very difficult to get H1B visa's now a days, so Canadians looking to move to the states, might not be able to.
591.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
Disclaimer: I'm the founder of GitSense ( https://gitsense.com ) that indexes code and Git history. Indexing and retrieving code at scale is actually a really challenging problem due to the fact that there is a lot of code, o
592.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
I've said this in the past, but you really have to focus on the more difficult things, if you want to stay competitive in Git hosting. If it is easy to implement and is useful, one of your competitors, is going to copy you. Right now
593.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
Here is a 90 day window, that shows how active it is, in greater detail: https://public.gitsense.com/insight/github?r=google/kythe#b%...
594.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
This looks interesting, but I would suspect if GitHub implemented wildcard matching, like this: https://public.gitsense.com/insight/github?r=tensorflow/tens... they could significantly improve discovery.
595.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
It is important to understand development for Linux is heavily driven by a business need. There are more than enough companies (intel, google, etc) that would gladly contribute to Linux, since it makes business sense.
596.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
I think you mean GitHub for data. Git is just a version control system and you can't differentiate yourself by supporting it. You can however, differentiate yourself, by being the place to share data like GitHub. In the past, Microso
597.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
> Do you think it’s possible to calculate the relationship between the depth of the git data and the number of I/O operations It's actually pretty straight forward since you know exactly what operations has to be done. With ver
598.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
> we could hack together some sort of cache for it to facilitate delta updates? Crunching diffs at scale is actually an extremely I/O intensive operation and I can say this from experience, since my product is doing just that. You c
599.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
Having talked to both Microsoft and GitHub, I get the impression that intelligent code reviews, is an area of great interest for both companies. In the near future (~2 years), I can see us starting to review code in both the traditional way
600.
▲
by
sdesol
9y ago
I've said it before, but if I were Atlassian, GitHub or GitLab, I would be very worried of Microsoft about now. I tried Visual Studio Team Service (VSTS) last year, and I wasn't all that impressed. In fact, I found it quite frust
More ›