sdesol

29 ms·

1. 361.▲
   by sdesol 3y ago

   Yes creating an "open source score" is something that I might do. The challenge is to obviously not turn it into a negative thing. For example, a low score could should be seen as being inviting for new contributors.
2. 362.▲
   by sdesol 3y ago

   Hey congrats. Your project is showing a hockey stick type growth https://devboard.gitsense.com/jmorganca/ollama which highlights how hot this space is right now. Full Disclosure: This is my tool.
3. 363.▲
   by sdesol 3y ago

   Yeah this is something I'll need to fix. Also, the repos limit is to keep resources in check. For example, crunching 5000 repos for Microsoft takes about 10 minutes and ties up 8 out of 20 query threads. Thanks for the feedback.
4. 364.▲
   by sdesol 3y ago

   Here's some project health insights, for those interested. https://devboard.gitsense.com/anyproto https://reviews.gitsense.com/insights/github?q=pull-age%3A%3... Looks like Jira is used for issue
5. 365.▲
   by sdesol 3y ago

   Hey thanks! And hopefully your green username doesn't make people think we are one of the same as your comment, while greatly appreciated, is not some smart (or stupid) marketing strategy on my part. I honestly believe we can work smar
6. 366.▲
   by sdesol 3y ago

   Here's some insights for what I believe to be the most popular ML repo out there right now, which is ggerganov/llama.cpp https://devboard.gitsense.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp The popularity of this project is kin
7. 367.▲
   by sdesol 3y ago

   Hey glad you find it useful. DevBoard just came out of stealth mode last week.
8. 368.▲
   by sdesol 3y ago

   Here's some open source insights regarding the repos mentioned so far. https://devboard.gitsense.com/twentyhq/twenty https://devboard.gitsense.com/salesagility/SuiteCRM https://dev
9. 369.▲
   by sdesol 3y ago

   Looks like a significant amount of work is being done in private since there is almost no activity for the public org repos, so it's hard to say how long they've been working at it. https://devboard.gitsense.com/ak
10. 370.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    Here's some community information regarding Maddy and Stalwart https://devboard.gitsense.com/stalwartlabs?repos=imap-server... https://devboard.gitsense.com/foxcpp?repos=go-jmap,maddy,mai... Not sure i
11. 371.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    Thanks for the additional info. If we are were to just look at the repo stats, Kirby is a lot more active than Grav right now. Do you happen to know what the archived repos were and if they are public? If you look at https://dev
12. 372.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    Yes you are right about not having the complete picture, as far as no code activity goes.
13. 373.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    It is not just git though. It's looking at no code participation as well.
14. 374.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    The active community for kirby is bigger than grav's as the following shows: https://devboard.gitsense.com/getkirby/kirby https://devboard.gitsense.com/getgrav/grav Historically speaking, gra
15. 375.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    Yeah I was aware of devstats and yes the UI is awkward to use. I'm planning on open sourcing DevBoard, since GitSense is really the differentiating factor, so CNCF is free to use it, if it wants to. I personally think Grafana is grea
16. 376.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    Thanks!
17. 377.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    Here's the insights for grpc https://devboard.gitsense.com/grpc/grpc They are attracting less people than istio but not by much. Full disclosure: This is my tool
18. 378.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    Here is some community information for istio https://devboard.gitsense.com/istio/istio Not kubernetes level https://devboard.gitsense.com/kubernetes/kubernetes but still very good. Full Disclosure
19. 379.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    Thanks. For a CTO, he is extremely active in the community. Only the ClickHouse robot is on par with his engagement. I'll reach out to him to see if ClickHouse is a viable option as my plan is to replace GitHub's insights tab wi
20. 380.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    Here's additional insights regarding the repo https://devboard.gitsense.com/pddemo/demo So far, my tool show 54 thousand issues were created by a single person in the last 6 weeks. Full disclosure: This is my too
21. 381.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    > greatly over-estimating the author's goal here Yeah it is clearly a showcase for ClickHouse which is worth bragging about since it is quite performant. And it has a very strong community as the following shows: https://
22. 382.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    Thanks. DevBoard just came out of stealth mode, but there are still things that need to be done, like those that you pointed out.
23. 383.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    It also has a healthy community around it as the following shows: https://devboard.gitsense.com/snipe/snipe-it Full disclosure: The insights are from my tool.
24. 384.▲
    by sdesol 3y ago

    I also don't believe they receive many non-employee contributions (probably because the software is more advanced than most open source projects). You can get a breakdown of their contributions at: https://imgur.com/a&
25. 385.▲
    by sdesol 4y ago

    This is something that I'm working on and I believe a couple of others as well. My solution won't be available until early next year though, as indexing public repos at scale is far from trivial and I'm expecting this will c
26. 386.▲
    by sdesol 4y ago

    The easiest way is to reach out to entrepreneurs that have raised before and see if they are willing to be an advisor in exchange for equity in your company. If you have something they believe in, they won't hesitate to introduce you
27. 387.▲
    by sdesol 5y ago

    > Thank you for the reply. You are welcome and your response has been extremely helpful as well. > I think at the core a comparison to Next is still apples to oranges imho and unnecessary here. I agree it is probably an apples and ora
28. 388.▲
    by sdesol 5y ago

    > Redwood is healthy I agree and I wrote "the project is quite healthy", so I don't quite know why others would interpret it in any other way. I also agree with the metrics that you laid out and those metrics will be surf
29. 389.▲
    by sdesol 5y ago

    The basic idea is, if somebody last committed more than 28 days ago, it is likely that they are not a "core contributor" since you would expect "core contributors" to commit more frequently than every 28 days. Hope that
30. 390.▲
    by sdesol 5y ago

    > they seem to have some active core contributors Looking at merged pull requests, the project is quite healthy as the following shows: https://oss.gitsense.com/insights/github?q=merged%3Atrue%2Bp... Next.js is on a