sdeep27

7 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by sdeep27 6y ago

   Such confidence about "gold standard" is hard to justify without ANY studies on mRNA long-term effects (how could there be > this is brand new vaccine technology and delivery). I would actually argue it is "safer" to
2. 32.▲
   by sdeep27 6y ago

   Counters cherry picked data with cherry picked data.
3. 33.▲
   by sdeep27 6y ago

   Where'd you come up with this logic? It's similar to saying I find modern banking unethical, therefore its only ethical that I hack in and steal both the depositors and the corporations money. Also why do you find gambling unethic
4. 34.▲
   by sdeep27 7y ago

   Suggestion: it would be very useful to see some examples.
5. 35.▲
   by sdeep27 7y ago

   Naive question - What is the process like for a security researcher to go about 'discovering' an open database like this?
6. 36.▲
   by sdeep27 9y ago

   If you have 95% coverage, and you have 10 separate random pieces, you actually have a 40% chance of failure.
7. 37.▲
   by sdeep27 9y ago

   These conclusions were gathered from a self-reported study of what people think are 'restful activities'. I would hardly consider the title an accurate conclusion to make. It is entirely possible that extroverts (or anyone in th
8. 38.▲
   Compare WebAssembly and JavaScript client side performance(d2jta7o2zej4pf.cloudfront.net)

   16 points by sdeep27 10y ago|3 comments
9. 39.▲
   First WebAssembly based library for JavaScript developers(github.com)

   4 points by sdeep27 10y ago|0 comments