scsh

6 ms·

31.
by scsh 1y ago
I like the idea of having vuln reporting in the installation step. Looking at the examples provided though, I think the vulnerability reporting could use a bit more information. Using the fastapi example, it points to CVE-2024-24762 which,
32.
by scsh 1y ago
You're describing pretty much every popular open source license here, including the Linux kernel(GPLv2). This doesn't set the expectation that things can and will break at any time. That's also not the approach maintainers
33.
by scsh 2y ago
fwiw, I did not have the same take away as you from that part of the comment. I think the intent, and the way I read it, was, "Even when eliminating bandwidth and latency as a factor it still takes 10 seconds to load."
34.
by scsh 2y ago
I don't think they really care, or feel that they have to care. The way that I've seen it work is they'll make rare exceptions for individuals they absolutely can't lose or wan't to hire but that's it and the
35.
by scsh 2y ago
It was never required to pay for it. As was common with software back then, the free download was a fully featured "evaluation" version denoted by an "N" appended to the version number. That didn't last long thoug
36.
by scsh 3y ago
The point of this isn't to hide your actual SSH service, but to tie up resources for those who are somewhat blindly scanning/connecting to any open SSH port.
37.
by scsh 3y ago
I work for a not so small company with a large international user base and wish I could have the option to geoblock sometimes. While you're not wrong about there being more intelligent ways to block traffic it's substantially more
38.
by scsh 4y ago
In addition, if they are sending email through a provider like Sendgrid, etc. you should send an abuse complaint directly to their provider.
39.
by scsh 4y ago
That doesn't seem like the optimal way of filtering when you're just trying to get eyes on your product. That criteria doesn't have anything to do with the product itself. This is something that's actually relevant to
40.
by scsh 4y ago
I felt the same about having to signup to even see it do something. It's really not about THIS particular product or the people behind it. It's just that I'm expected to do this with seemingly ever new thing that I want to
41.
by scsh 4y ago
EU laws can often be written in such a way and are a bit looser in their language in ways when compared to how it may be written in the US. EU courts are more experienced with dealing with interpretations of "reasonableness" for
42.
by scsh 4y ago
The TOS can be updated/changed/clarified over time and they could end up falling outside of what they cover as a result. It's not great and sucks as a customer but it can happen.
43.
by scsh 4y ago
Absolutely. The Democratic news, as you termed it, is very much responsible for platforming what were, until now, what we'd consider much more fringe ideologies. At the very least they are helping to shift the Overton window in the w
44.
by scsh 7y ago
Not attempting to excuse their lack of action, but there are cases where it's somewhat understandable why a registrar may not take action. For instance, if the only service they're actually providing is registration, the domain b
45.
by scsh 9y ago
Eh, I read it as more of a rhetorical question given the phrasing. why would anyone ever WANT to work for a company that... vs why would anyone ever work for a company that...
46.
by scsh 9y ago
Apparently the author and HN user are the same person.
47.
by scsh 9y ago
They said it was the first send to their ~14 year old list, so a ton of those addresses probably didn't even exist anymore.
48.
by scsh 9y ago
He's also got a Shadertoy version here: https://www.shadertoy.com/view/MdX3Rr
49.
by scsh 9y ago
Care to explain why this is hypocritical and why there shouldn't be any regulation around non-mobile internet?
50.
by scsh 9y ago
If they aren't paying for a dedicated IP, those emails would be going out across the shared IP pool, and a particular IP's reputation would be affected be everyone who's email went out via that IP.