Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
scscsc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
It doesn't seem to work for me.
92.
▲
PLT Redex: a DSL for operational semantics
(redex.plt-scheme.org)
2 points
by
scscsc
15y ago
|
0 comments
93.
▲
History of OCaml
(caml.inria.fr)
2 points
by
scscsc
15y ago
|
0 comments
94.
▲
Functory: Parallel/distributed computing library for Objective Caml
(functory.lri.fr)
14 points
by
scscsc
15y ago
|
0 comments
95.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
So writing a JavaScript drag-and-drop widget framework counts as complicated?
96.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
Whenever I see lists like this, I think: - why doesn't it read "list of good programming books"? (the more the merrier, but how about quality?) - how can such a huge list help anyone? Certainly no-one will read a significant percentage of
97.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
This makes me think about an interesting attack vector ;-) If you want to silence emails in email provider Y about subject X, you send email to many accounts of Y about X. Then you have the accounts report the messages as spam. Now every em
98.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
He's missing scriptability, modularity and extensibility. Also, most GUIs (that programmers care about) lag behind the CLI in features (i.e. command-line GDB vs graphical debuggers).
99.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
I got ~12K, but I highly doubt the accuracy... I suspect that I know ~1K words, maybe 2K. I remember hearing that people usually use around 100 or 200 distinct words/day. According to http://math.ucdenver.edu/~wbriggs/qr/shakespeare.html ,
100.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
I've played very little with GO, and it seems to be a nice language overall. Anyway, it's designed to allow easy parallelism. It's a system's language for parallel work. The only thing that I don't like about it is that the built-in types g
101.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
"You will not feel any difference between your language and Java."
102.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
There seems to be a PhD thesis behind, so you should check it for the grammar.
103.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
Here is the problem: PayPal was born in the US. Among other things, probably because it was easier for them to do business there. PayPal couldn't have been concieved in Europe.
104.
▲
by
scscsc
15y ago
Nothing.
105.
▲
A memory gotcha in C++
(nothingintoinsight.blogspot.com)
8 points
by
scscsc
16y ago
|
0 comments
106.
▲
by
scscsc
16y ago
He does not use a JIT, he translated his code into C by hand.
107.
▲
by
scscsc
16y ago
I somewhat agree. I have a stronger postulate: current proof assistants are worse for writing proofs than machine language. There is a reason not to panic: it can only get better, not worse...
108.
▲
by
scscsc
16y ago
I do not think it's a matter of connection speed. This way of "browsing" is not "browsing" -- you're just getting what you want. It's really about efficiency (in the sense of not wasting your time).
109.
▲
by
scscsc
16y ago
It was known at the time that correlation is not causation. That is a classic example of taking dietary advice from the incompetent.
110.
▲
by
scscsc
16y ago
You listen to science and not to crackpots who pretend to do science. Note that most advice regarding nutrition appearing in newspapers/blogs is total crap (as opposed to science). If you can't distinguish science from crap (or can't be bot
111.
▲
by
scscsc
16y ago
Ok, so Prolog is nice. We know that already. But the story lacks any real content... It's really just: we used Prolog, it seemed to be a lot faster to code and the customer was happy.
112.
▲
by
scscsc
16y ago
This study is broken in multiple ways, so you should not take it seriously. Why can't people (= medical "researchers") learn their statistics?
113.
▲
by
scscsc
16y ago
When people say "get hit by the bus" in this context, it means "decide you don't wanna work here anymore and leave".
114.
▲
by
scscsc
16y ago
Actually the problem is too much privacy. University staff have access to your email without any problem if you store it on their system. However, on Google's system, they can't access it at all. They probably don't like this very much.
115.
▲
by
scscsc
17y ago
Funny, I thought that the technologies he (clearly) enjoys (and appreciates) today were built by people who were thinking along the lines of: oh shit, it takes 30 years to walk to California, why couldn't we just fly there? It's ok to appre
116.
▲
by
scscsc
17y ago
Negative; you should look up literate programming ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literate_programming ). Basically you compile the lhs into a pdf before reading it ;-)
117.
▲
by
scscsc
17y ago
Besides yourself, who is good?
118.
▲
by
scscsc
17y ago
It's not that they are more protected; market economy simply works that way: MS/Apple/Google/Facebook/etc are competing for employers, the best way to get good ones is from good interns.
119.
▲
by
scscsc
17y ago
It's two different things: - one, quantum computers can theoretically do factoring in polynomial time and therefore theoretically break schemes such as RSA (such schemes are proven secure provided that some computational problem is intrac
120.
▲
by
scscsc
17y ago
What's wrong with every software ever written having a Wikipedia page if someone cares enough to make one?
More ›