scrum-treats

10 ms·

61.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
The NFT/NFC is locked so the tag is immutable, and only the seller and Amazon have the public key. Barring some hack on the NFT/NFC tagging software (which could happen in theory), you'd need both the private and public key t
62.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
In the last 3 years it's been obsessing over how to better exploit customers. As a result, there's no innovative solutions happening, and whatever is being pushed is sloppily executed and filled with vulnerabilities. It is quite d
63.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
It really is an MLM. It's pretty crazy that it's been operating for this long without such visible degradation, until the last 2-2.5 years.
64.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
What in the LexisNexis 2.0 is this...
65.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
Did the FBI also warn these attacks were homegrown (i.e., we're authorizing private companies to execute phishing attacks)?
66.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
It makes sense. It's not great but it does make sense. Also, do big crawlers even observe robots.txt?
67.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
Take the current situation with San Francisco as a clear example of where this leads.
68.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
so... time travel back to pre-2020s?
69.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
From the bear's perspective, perhaps there are too many humans encroaching on its habitat.
70.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
The data is essentially this: Amazon owns a bunch of real estate and has lots of partnerships and tax breaks associated with congregating lots of people in certain locations. If they continue to allow work from home, then Amazon is on the h
71.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
It hurts, doesn't it? It's as if people's minds were deleted and now AI is "brand new."
72.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
This is a great example of "keep saying it so that people think it's true." Meanwhile people are complaining of not receiving their Prime Day deliveries, still, receiving incorrect and/or damaged goods, and when attempti
73.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
GPT 4 already does this. I wonder what competitive edge Grammarly is implementing here.
74.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
It's not a personal attack. It's a statement of cause and effect. When a person is programmed to think and believe a certain way, to the point of operant conditioning, that pattern in the brain fires first. By design. That's
75.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
> The "algorithm" is that I read your comment and saw that it was obviously breaking the rules. I wish I knew how to write software to do that correctly, but I don't. Got it. Maybe I will give it a shot and share it. I&#x2
76.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
> "Meta is really clearly trying to differentiate themselves from OpenAI here. Open source + driving home "we don't use data we haven't paid for / don't own"." Isn't Meta settling lawsuits for
77.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
It's already being used. AI was used to generate disinformation in 2020 as well, and onward. It's not a new revelation. One issue is that post-COVID we're less social in-person. This makes us especially susceptible to disinfo
78.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
This is how cults work. Another example is Republicans who believe in Trumpism and QAnon. It is quite reasonable that those persons can use a defense of insanity, because they are brainwashed (i.e., not in control of their minds). It's
79.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
> You broke the site guidelines egregiously in this thread with flamewar, snark, and even personal attack. Please do explain the algorithm that resolves to a True statement here. I can't find a link to the codebase for the sentiment
80.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
> And you are the only one who can see clearly through everything. How nice. I'm not the sole arbiter of truth. Lots of people research and write about these topics. I'm also autistic and this happens to be one of the things I
81.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
> That doesn't mean civilian "reality" is somehow more valid or more accurate than military "reality". It's not any more valid than living in a different culture. There's an assimilation that one underg
82.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
> I'm just pointing out that this has nothing whatever to do with the military being a cult. So, it actually does. One must "de-program", meaning to unravel previous programming, such that the brain can learn a new wiring
83.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
Do let me know if you want to engage with some scientific research, and/or declassified docs that describe exactly what I'm saying. Happy to share, because science and scientific method.
84.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
> but devalue it because they don't understand it. No one is devaluing it. I'm certainly not. Rather it is highlighting that humans are vulnerable, by genetic design. And it requires actual help to reprogram the brain. To take
85.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
>> You've tricked the brain into believing a specific version of reality that is not objective reality > Whereas civilians, of course, have a completely accurate view of objective reality with no illusions? It is to laugh. No.
86.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
> You're making a correlation that the best leaders are at the top, but that's not the case. I'm not. I said this: "However, the majority of military is not in the upper echelons of the power hierarchy. And the major
87.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
> The only reason to even have a military is to have the ability to fight and win wars. If your military can't do that, it's not worth having at all. While it is one use case, it is not all use cases. > Is this based on pers
88.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
> But the notion that the military's 'objective' is the "continuous exploitation of lower level persons" is utter nonsense. Is it? > The objective of the U.S. Military is to fight and win wars. Is it? > Th
89.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
Exactly. Not everyone is thinking about women, and that's normal.
90.
by scrum-treats 3y ago
Uh, we should think twice about throwing tons of money at corporations and private contractors expecting them to fill the void on defense.

More ›