Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
scotty79
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
331.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
I don't understand why labs don't include correct model name in the training process. Almost nobody seems to be willing to tell their models who they actually are.
332.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
Ah, yes, sorry, I misread your comment.
333.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
The spot you live in might be an outlier. Golf courses in US use half a trillion gallons of fresh water annually.
334.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
What does that prove? That AIs are not RLd for counting letters in texts? Do you doubt that they could excel at it with only synthetic data?
335.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
> Golf courses are lungs of many of the growing cities, across the world What? Why and how? And why wouldn't leaving a patch of forest there be way more efficient?
336.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
Golf courses in USA use half a trillion gallons of fresh water annually. All data centers use less than 0.2 (of which only less than 0.02 is used for cooling the servers, the rest is just electricity generation, which can and should be repl
337.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
USA lives only through its enemies. Attempt at supplanting Soviet Union with terrorists failed spectacularly. Recent stunt of portraying China as the enemy won't probably go well either. It might go even worse since China, unlike any p
338.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
Thanks, you are right. I missed that somehow. It's weird that people don't routinely pass the prose they produce through anti-slop check. If it's easy to detect for us it should be even easier to detect and remove with AI.
339.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
AI is a technology. Probably as significant as a steam engine. I'd rather be poor in the world with this technology than average in the world where it doesn't exist.
340.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
Would you rather be poor in XXI century or rich in XIII? Are you rich in "normal" life? Hint: If you sell the time of your life for money you are not rich.
341.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
How can you tell?
342.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
> even if they were free. They are free. You can download glm-5.2 and run it on your own hardware. Even you got hardware for free, electricity would cost you more than the sub, in most places.
343.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
I think we are already quarter of century in. It started with reaction to 9/11 and only got worse since then. Damage was pretty much self-inflicted.
344.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
Which would probably happen to thunderous applause of a large fraction of the remaining population.
345.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
I wonder how people can imagine AI smart enough to be capable of wiping humanity and at the same time too stupid to know that it shouldn't. I can imagine a human like that way easier than AI.
346.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
There is a concept of causing accidental harm.
347.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
You know which people are eager to take on more responsibilities? The people who don't believe in the concept responsibility.
348.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
CEOs are basically dice rollers. "Proven" are just formerly lucky gamblers. The only control that CEO has is whether they roll the dice themselves or let their underlings roll. It's entirely possible that the only CEOs that a
349.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
> or they are using Kimi K2.x That would be terrible because Kimi 2.x is in a different world than Kimi 3 Having opinions on current Kimi model based on 2.x would be like dismissing gpt-5.6-sol because of experiences with gpt4o
350.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
How about gainful transformation of natural language text? Because that's what AI users are hoping for.
351.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
This is such a petty and impotent ruling. If you want to ban them from using culture to make derivative works without proper compensation then do that. But if you don't want to ban them, telling them to buy one book of each, likely sec
352.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
What's gonna be your payout and are you satisfied with it?
353.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
> The award was $3,000 per book, which is about 100X higher than it would have cost to buy the books. How many of the authors would license their book for endless creation of derivative works for that amount?
354.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
Chinese companies compete ruthlessly between themselves though. That's how they get this good. Full competition with preventing exploitation by foreign countries seems to be working great for them. American and European protectionism o
355.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
How the hell is non-compete legal in market economy? Competition is one of its core strengths. Why would anyone let anyone opt out of this, even a little bit?
356.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
> Making an LLM from raw data is value-add. > Distillation is just value extract. There is a value-add in selecting the valuable parts out of the garbage. And let's face it. Largest models contain a lot of garbage.
357.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
And humans are designed to exploit that forgetfulness in others.
358.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
Is your child interested in Chinese AIs? Watch out! He might be a hacker. Report him to authorities immediately for assesment.
359.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
> not unlike learning kitchen utensils and the locations of the drawers they’re in. The problem is it's someone else's very messy kitchen where nothing is where you expect it to be. It matters where things are. Photoshop vs Fir
360.
▲
by
scotty79
3mo ago
mistakes are at the moment a signature quality of human written texts, enjoy them
More ›