scj

38 ms·

331.
by scj 17y ago
I would agree completely with you, if the next sentence was "In a similar situation at a different company, no one on the board..." But without such a line, I read that as commentary based on previous experiences, followed by a continuatio
332.
by scj 17y ago
I'm kind of confused on the timeline: "Last week as a favor to a friend..." "The best engineers quietly put the word out that they were available, and in less than month..." While both statements can be true together, it would seem to me th
333.
by scj 17y ago
What could explain the result is self-confidence. The data comes from a source that needs to be double-blind but wasn't. What would be interesting would be to do have one party write two separate emails talking about a different subject. T
334.
by scj 17y ago
He kind of mentioned that when he criticized fair use. He puts up a pay wall, one person buys a subscription, blogs about it, and there isn't much he can do. He can't copyright the news after all, only his journalists' expression of it.
335.
by scj 17y ago
"I must admit the title of this article is a bit of a misnomer. When I began writing the article I agreed with the title, but after reading up on what Defensive Programming really is, I realized. I am a defensive programmer." Next time the
336.
by scj 17y ago
FTA: We like the element of discovery that comes from not knowing exactly how things will behave if they are joined together or taken apart. We like to say things like, “oh”, “aah”, or “that’s cool” when we half-intentionally fumble our wa
337.
by scj 17y ago
Mini has been getting soft in his old age. At least with Vista in 2006, he had the sense to say: "Of course, the proof is in the pudding..." Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if the guy was caught and is now nothing but a mouthpiece.