schtog

24 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by schtog 18y ago

   I'm stuck on 31, I'm so stuck I lowered myself down to looking in the walkthrough and I'm still stuck. Is it a bug on that level? I throw down the block and try to jump on it but I don't get high enough.
2. 182.▲
   by schtog 18y ago

   It might be, I am not THAT knowledgeable about gametheory and poker-AI, I was just straightening out the concepts. From what I understand 3-player poker is much more like 9-player poker than HU and NL is much more complicated than limit.
3. 183.▲
   by schtog 18y ago

   Are you kidding me? I think it is more important than ever.
4. 184.▲
   by schtog 18y ago

   Unfortunetaley I never got around to playing the first Fable but now I've decided to play nr 2 instead. Looking great, Resident Evil 5 is also interesting. I never liked the ones that were released to PlayStation but nr 4 was an amazing gam
5. 185.▲
   by schtog 18y ago

   I find the combination of timing and thinking is what makes it very interesting. Really superb game. Few games make you think both logically and philosophically. Very cool mindbender!
6. 186.▲
   by schtog 18y ago

   I misunderstood.
7. 187.▲
   by schtog 18y ago

   Python: def quicksort(lst): if len(lst) == 0: return [] else: return quicksort([x for x in lst[1:] if x < lst[0]]) + [lst[0]] + \ quicksort([x for x in lst[1:] if x >= lst[0]]
8. 188.▲
   by schtog 18y ago

   I don't especially like Javas libraries either but they are usable and there are a lot of them and some very good ones.
9. 189.▲
   by schtog 18y ago

   "During the twentieth century, thinkers such as Karl Popper and David Miller have disputed the existence, necessity and validity of any inductive reasoning, including probabilistic (Bayesian) reasoning[citation n" http://en.wikipedia.org/w
10. 190.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Hmm, an article about LISP on the JVM that doesn't mention Clojure... Clojure is awesome, LISP + JAVA-libraries + JVM -> portability
11. 191.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Noone said it wasn't. Fact is a gametheoretically optimal player will beat all players than dont play gametheoretically optimal. So yes you are right that a perfectly playing bot might not beat a really weak player for as much as the best h
12. 192.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    In for example roshambo that is the case but not in poker. Poker has dominated strategical choices so someone playing gametheorhetically optimal will beat someone that doesn't. Of course if his opponent is also playing GT-optimally they wil
13. 193.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    I am working on image and videosearch, just getting started though. Are you talking about that or more like robotics systems?
14. 194.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Most people here need to look into what OPTIMAL in a gametheoretic sense means. It doesn't mean optimal in the way people normally use it. A player playing gametheoretically optimal will beat ALL other players. That is however not the same
15. 195.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Higginbotham is an awesome name!
16. 196.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Isnt that exactly what Linux could handle? If the financial incentive is there for sure I think you'd see a supercustomerfriendly linux OS. there already is Ubuntu. And running ten years without problems is what Ubuntu is for, not windows.
17. 197.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Related/similar: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=224324
18. 198.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Are all Google's algorhitm open for use by anyone? I mean PageRank and this for example. Do they patent just so noone else can steal it or I have to license PageRank from Google in order to use it?
19. 199.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    To keep you in line unfortuneately.
20. 200.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    "Fortunately, Dr. Li's proof fails alongside a respectable graveyard of previous attempts." Why fortuneately and not unfortuneately?
21. 201.▲
    Ask HN: What software has made you go "wow?"

    2 points by schtog 18y ago|4 comments
22. 202.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Python
23. 203.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Idea for a startup: www.emacsonline.com
24. 204.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Yes that is true and I know a lot of languages and while Python perhaps doesnt offer as deep possibilities within each paradigm it offers every paradigm. As you said this makes it very good for writing programs and does so in a lot of diffe
25. 205.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    For me it was the same. Python offers it all, functional, procedural, object-oriented. So you just choose hwta fits the problem best and dont worry about politics. Personally while learning Python I was also learning functional languages an
26. 206.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    DANSKJÄÄÄÄÄVVLLLAAAAARRR!!!!
27. 207.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    I personally feel like functional programming will rise. I mean it has been on the side for a long time will OO has been all the rave. And now as conncurrency/parallellism becomes more important, well functional programming handles that muc
28. 208.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Yes it is a constant theme in Sweden about how the swedish language is detoriating(it is not in my opinion, just changing).
29. 209.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    I completely agree with you, like I said I dont smoke it(doesnt give me anything) but I dont mind if you do. Legalizing also makes it safer I guess, on the other hand I guess also more widespread but if it's legalized it can be taxed which
30. 210.▲
    by schtog 18y ago

    Good point but some cancerpatients smoke marijuana to lessen the pain.