Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
schneems
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
schneems
11mo ago
Not the person you're replying to, but they are replying to me. If there is any doubt about my position: being gay is 100% not a choice.
32.
▲
by
schneems
11mo ago
> No, you previously implied that the discovery of this information is somehow leading to less judgment and blame and more of an effort to understand. No
33.
▲
by
schneems
11mo ago
> I don't think she's seeking one vs the other, nor is she judging him less now that she knows he's had a bunch of affairs. She's presenting a story and it's obvious that she has mixed feelings, full of both posi
34.
▲
by
schneems
11mo ago
> Is it even remotely appropriate to blame without first understanding? Yet, blame is easy and satisfying and true understanding requires empathy and is hard and often unsatisfying. The term "understanding" is fractal and infin
35.
▲
by
schneems
11mo ago
I (think I) got it from ReinH on birdsite (before everyone left and moved to mastodon and Bluesky). He also gave a lot of talks on blameless postmortems and culture and general SRE stuff. This is one talk but not sure if it touches on the o
36.
▲
by
schneems
11mo ago
> I only questioned why he would have brought kids into the "union", They might be lead to believe "if only we got married ... if only we had kids ... that will 'fix' it." Even straight couples who aren'
37.
▲
by
schneems
11mo ago
I agree. To me, it's like a blameless retro. You can either seek understanding or seek blame, but not both at once. The author seemingly had a lot of judgement and blame for the dad before finding this out. It sounds like they are seek
38.
▲
Disallow code usage with a custom `clippy.toml`
(schneems.com)
2 points
by
schneems
11mo ago
|
0 comments
39.
▲
by
schneems
11mo ago
Available on Heroku https://devcenter.heroku.com/changelog-items/3479
40.
▲
Upgrade to Puma 7 and Unlock the Power of Fair Scheduled Keep-Alive
(heroku.com)
3 points
by
schneems
11mo ago
|
0 comments
41.
▲
by
schneems
11mo ago
As a rubyist: traits are strictly typed ducktyping. I love them.
42.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
I miss him too. We knew each other online for some time, but that was the first time I ever met him in person. I came back and couldn’t stop talking about him to my wife when she asked how the conf went. Truly an inspiring experience. I ho
43.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
It’s not even remotely close to the main point of the article but: I really like the Chris Seaton callout. I talked about this initiative with him the RubyConf before he passed. Open Source contributors and maintainers feel that there is a
44.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
“No politics at work” except for Dave who spends company time posting political blog entries on his company built platform. FWIW I captured a timeline of events in this post but a lot of the Twitter links are dead now. https://sc
45.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
You can hang up and call the number on the back of your card
46.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
I’ve been on both sides of this equation. If someone is dinging you for doing extra work, it could be a sign that your priorities are not aligned. Like, if you’ve got a tight deadline coming up, it’s not the time to spend a week making CI s
47.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
The pay question is valid, but not appropriate for a technical interview. If someone asked me I wouldn’t even know the answer. That would be a question for the recruiter or possible engineering manager. I think it’s 100% okay to ask about p
48.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
Oh for sure. Ask questions, just not annoying whiteboard questions. Also I hate this “ask us anything” part of the interview. It’s so performative. It should be rephrased as “the jeopardy round” since it’s still about the candidate, but phr
49.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
It’s a trick question. The number is a distraction. If they don’t ask the model year of the VW Beatle they’re clearly not detail oriented and can’t be trusted. /s
50.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
I’ve never actually done this. But I’ve fantasized about preparing several interview questions for the company I’m interviewing at. They forget that interviews are a two way street. If I like them (and the process was bearable), I would ask
51.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
I learned to love rustfmt but there’s one thing that bothers me: There’s a few times where there are two ways to do something like a one line closure can omit the curly brackets, but multi line closures cannot. Rustfmt prefers to remove tho
52.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
Thanks! Have you found any types of meditation work better or are easier? Suggestion where to start if it hasn’t stuck in the past?
53.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
Next time Please state that upfront: you don’t know anyone with ADHD that this has been effective for and you dont have ADHD yourself. “Have you tried” comments from people without firsthand experience is basically asking others to be your
54.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
I’m not clear. Are you someone who has ADHD or is this recommendation based on experiences with someone with ADHD? I have ADHD and meditation, for me, is very difficult. Painful even.
55.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
Nothing about your these words reads as constructive to me: > This is absolutely infuriating for me to see: People keep posting shit like "do it right or i will kill a puppy, you can get bitcoin if you are right" then never any
56.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
The interesting thing here is that it breaks assumptions that to be "alpha" you MUST dominate to win. Even if within only these parameters, it suggest there are conditions where being "nice" isn't just a nebulous et
57.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
The somewhat counterintuitive rules for the best expected strategy to repeated conflicts: - Nice - Friendly - Retaliatory/provokable - Clear https://youtu.be/mScpHTIi-kM At 15:00 in.
58.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
I don’t think you realize that you’re making demands on an author who doesn’t owe you anything. And what you’re asking for is quite difficult. I think it’s okay to frame it as a wish or a desire. “I wish more articles include …” Or as frust
59.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
The article is stating what inputs they used and the output they observed. They stated they saw more tokens used and more time spent before returning an answer. That seems like a data point you can test. Which is maybe not the zoom level or
60.
▲
by
schneems
1y ago
The problem I have with this approach is that it seems models get confused with prescriptive information such as print “it worked” or a comment stating the desired intent of code (which it doesn’t do at all). As opposed to descriptive infor
More ›