sbaiddn

21 ms·

181.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
If it's a priori known that it's easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission then it means that the penalties for breaking the law are too lenient. How about the "move fast and break things" SV type bros go
182.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Eventually. Until then its cloud over Mexico.
183.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
That's weird, I use Mac (x86) and Linux (x86 Debian) and Firefox works great on Linux but is unusable on Mac (at least it was two or so years ago when I last tried). I have an nvidia card and non free drivers if that matters
184.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Linear-log -> asinh(x) Its linear for small values and log for large. It also has the advantage that it is continuous and smooth. (Obviously asinh is not very useful for allocation) I first thought of it while pondering an amp that would
185.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Stinky, sure but unsanitary? Its ash. And no self respecting smoker will get the butt wet with saliva, its bad form. Its more sanitary than chewing gum! (And civilized, but chewing gum is a low bar)
186.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
How about we judge people for what they say and not what we fantasize they meant to say? Judging others based on what we feel they really meant to say is a very dangerous course.
187.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
That's a statement of fact that is either true or not. It is not a statement of culpability in anyway. Men are pigs (see that's a fact and an example of a moral judgement), and are almost exclusively to blame for the spread of STD
188.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
How do you infer that op is blaming women? They merely stated a fact and didn't assign any blame.
189.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
You are not a retina. You cant see photons.
190.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Question in the title -> No. TL/DR: No, we cant. The retina itself can respond to a single photon, but we are not retinas. Instead, the eye filters out this low light sensitivity lest we go crazy with the resulting visual noise at
191.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Are you asking why they need a Mac or why they need a laptop?
192.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Almost none. If you aren't sorting the plastic by type (the number in the package) it probably won't get done and will be routed to a landfill (or river) in Asia. Big corporate consumers of plastic can recycle because they guarant
193.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
The problem with plastics (polymers, really) is that if even 1% off collected polymer of type A (say PE) is off type B (say ABS), then their melt wont mix. If the mix doesn't melt you get spinal decomposition, as microstructure that lo
194.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Breaking polymers down is a thing though. Not my area of expertise, but they try to make feedstock organic or of it. Lots of research to make it cheap and better control off the outputs. But I wouldn't expect a crystal clear liquid ou
195.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Don't recycle. If its going to get dumped anyway put your plastic recycling in the garbage. Then it'll end up in a nominally regulated local dump and not in a Vietnamese river. Btw anyone who has even a cursory understanding of
196.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
No idea how this thing works but why wouldn't it destroy all "dyes"? It breaks every other bond, why not dye bonds? I'm also curious that the liquid is clear, though, because you'd think this thing creates a soup of
197.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Radio signals attenuate eith r^2 and eventually drop bellow of the background cosmic noise.
198.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
There are centuries of research into inelastic collisions, starting with Newton himself who, instead of resting on the laurels of his three laws, modeled the limiting case for high velocity collisions. Very cute model, btw. Aside from the
199.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Because he ignored the possibilities of rockers, or because he didn't believe his laws are valid in the planetary scale?
200.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
1 the amount of deflection does depend on ejecta which.... depends on your target. Different target, different ejecta. Btw, in my own research I have to deal with balancing momentum to measure the amount of ejecta so Im quite familiar wit
201.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Windows 2000 was the best MS OS IMHO. Looked just like win98, but was from their NT line.
202.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
In highschool we used an air hockey table to come to the same conclusion: the laws of Newton are valid.
203.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Why not assume that illegal, fake, stolen, etc goods are easily available on Amazon?
204.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
I mean you're going to shower in a few hours anyway. But until you do you have to sleep with that sticky smell.
205.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
So the error are used to trip traditional tools like ddrescue like in the days of old?
206.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Why does ddrescue care about "file systems"? Again, I was under the impression that ddrescue does bit by bit copying that I can then mount (and tell it the "filesystem" required). Is this false? I have also noticed that,
207.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Can someone explain to me why this is needed vs an imagining tool (say ddrescue)? Is there no tool that actually makes a bit perfect copy yet?
208.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Without opposable thumbs they didn't have anything that dolphins dont also have today
209.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
Not a nuclear engineer, but Im curious to know how they do it - throttling nuke is hard. I only know the stream "dumping" method. There's good reason why they are hard to throttle. For starters thermal contraction shortened l
210.
by sbaiddn 4y ago
No one, except tailors and very insecure men, cares about anyone's height to within an inch.

More ›