Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
saynay
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
saynay
3y ago
Most attacks are remote, not involving physical access to a specific (compromised) device. Think a compromised website exposing 1000s of peoples passwords, and trying those passwords against other services. For that threat vector, it is mor
62.
▲
by
saynay
3y ago
I believe the other big thing is it allowed you to parallelize the training as well, so you could split those colossal training sets across many machines in a way you could not do with LSTMs.
63.
▲
by
saynay
3y ago
On the one hand, yes. On the other hand, if they are both going to have liability issues, choosing the one that isn't literally full of lawyers seems like a smart play.
64.
▲
by
saynay
3y ago
Most still believe that "really intelligent AI" is still a long way off, from what I have seen. Many have started to believe there can be a lot of harm caused by the systems well before then, however.
65.
▲
by
saynay
3y ago
I think that was more because places like Reddit just linking directly to the image meant they couldn't serve ads to pay for it. So they needed to make an incentive for people to directly visit the site, and the most obvious way was to
66.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
Bard would not trick anyone into thinking it was sentient, yet something they have supposedly did. I just think Google has far more to lose than Bing, so they are being more cautious.
67.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
I am curious which clause of 230 you think would not cover recommendation systems?
68.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
Kaniko is what I use as well, since I initially had some containers that were not building correctly with buildah. Not quite as seamless as buildah promised to be, but it can read Dockerfiles with no modifications, so it was easy enough to
69.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
I remember VMWare solved this with a balloon driver, that basically asks the guest for a lot of memory at a very low priority, so it has precedence over the page cache, but under any program that actually needs it.
70.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
Same as it ever was. What is acceptable to make fun of and what is not is constantly shifting with the times. What seems more constant is people being upset that what was once acceptable is now frowned upon, and the friction that causes the
71.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
Such as Twitch's opinion that this joke was a violation of their TOS, and thus deserving of a temp ban? That opinion seems to be making a lot of people here pretty uncomfortable.
72.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
But why? I am under the impression the Q crowd doesn't tend to be the wealthiest bunch. Tesla was also already selling every car they could make, with like a 6 month backorder. Expanding, or switching, your target market makes no sense
73.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
As far as I can tell, because it allows one-man production teams. A single person can do everything, without needing to find a vocalist. It allows them to try more stuff quicker and easier, and anything that happened to get popular ends up
74.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
Signal also has a grand total of 40 employees. Keeping the application running on the various platforms takes a decent chunk of their time. Difficult development to add something like federation cannot be expected to happen quickly.
75.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
You can copyright derivative, transformative work though? I don't think current legal frameworks are equipped to handle these types of generative works. There will need to be either new laws, or at least some legal precedence establish
76.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
One of the more interesting things I have seen recently is the combination of different domains in models / datasets. The top network of Stable Diffusion combines text-based descriptions with image-based descriptions, where the model l
77.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
That is a bit of an oversimplification. The presence of money is no sufficient, that money must be in circulation. For example, they can print all the money they want, if they just toss it all in a big bank account and never remove it, ther
78.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
The reason I saw mentioned is that NSFW content was so prevalent in their training set that, if they did not explicitly exclude it, it was actually difficult for it to NOT produce NSFW results even from normal inputs. For example, if you as
79.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
Pretty sure that one already exists. A de-censoring and inpainting one, if I remember right.
80.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
At some point, these discussions always get to some question like "what is 'knowing'?" Would a person who only ever read articles and looked at pictures of giraffes have a better understanding of them than Dall-e does? A
81.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
I am not really sure that this is a basis to say human intelligence is fundamentally different. If you ask a human to draw a picture based on nonsensical input, they probably wont. That might not be a difference in process, but in agency. S
82.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
More, the author saw mention of it pop up on thier Twitter feed, so wrote an article to cash in on the current "controversy" with no actual research beyond Twitter.
83.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
We are going to be seeing this more frequently in cars, and probably hardware overall. Having a single hardware spec that is license-limited to various levels is just cheaper for the manufacturer in how it simplifies their logistics. It als
84.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
The individual ops could be faster, so even though there are more of them, the overall speed is quicker. The authors mention using more 16bit ops, so that might be part of the reason?
85.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
All YOLOs past v3 will be, to some extent, since the original author wont be releasing anymore versions. This one looks to be in pytorch, so it is also not in darknet. I am not really sure what makes it "YOLO" anymore other than b
86.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
More like 5 people who get to be in charge of whatever they feel like at the time.
87.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
The fact that we can say a person revolutionized the field is specifically because their work, at some point in time, got recognized by a larger audience. The fact that an artist had pushback is also context that is used to determine someth
88.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
I would actually say that humans have an enormous extra set of data that we, as people, are "trained" on. We walk around in our daily lives, seeing things constantly, and that influences our perception of art. Art is always a prod
89.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
The generation side is actually probably easier than the critic side. I don't know of any network that is capable of determining if something is aesthetically pleasing in an abstract sense, instead they always compare to known examples
90.
▲
by
saynay
4y ago
Generation of a "style", even for humans, requires a feedback loop where what was created is incorporated, mimicked, and expanded upon. An AI whose training model only rewarded images that mimicked 19th-century art would never dev
More ›